Bassem A Almalki, Fawaz M Alotaibi, Mohammed Aldholmi, Yousef S Alqarni, Sawsan M Kurdi, Mohammed M Alsultan, Wafa A Alzlaiq, Mansour M Alotaibi, Noor M Alashi, Fatimah S Alzahrani, Nouf E Alotaibi, Mohamed A Albekery, Sarah A Albilal, Khawla M Kahtani, Mohammed Abdelgawad Gafar, Sahar M Al-Mowaina, Ahmed K Alalawi, Abdullah A Alshehab, Ahmed J Aljasem, Abdulkareem M Albekairy
{"title":"在沙特阿拉伯的移植受者中使用草药:患病率和风险意识。","authors":"Bassem A Almalki, Fawaz M Alotaibi, Mohammed Aldholmi, Yousef S Alqarni, Sawsan M Kurdi, Mohammed M Alsultan, Wafa A Alzlaiq, Mansour M Alotaibi, Noor M Alashi, Fatimah S Alzahrani, Nouf E Alotaibi, Mohamed A Albekery, Sarah A Albilal, Khawla M Kahtani, Mohammed Abdelgawad Gafar, Sahar M Al-Mowaina, Ahmed K Alalawi, Abdullah A Alshehab, Ahmed J Aljasem, Abdulkareem M Albekairy","doi":"10.12659/AOT.947275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Herbal medicine is commonly used in Saudi Arabia, and is widely viewed as natural and safe. However, its use among transplant recipients poses risks due to interactions with immunosuppressive therapies. This study explores herbal medicine use, knowledge, and attitudes among Saudi transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study of 203 transplant recipients from multiple clinics in Saudi Arabia was conducted using a structured questionnaire to assess demographics, herbal supplement use, awareness of risks, and attitudes. Statistical analyses compared users and non-users of herbal supplements. RESULTS Post-transplant herbal supplement use decreased significantly (44.3% to 19.2%, p=0.0001). Many relied on unreliable sources like friends or the internet, and 54.24% of reported supplements posed interaction risks with immunosuppressive drugs. Participants aware of these risks were significantly less likely to use herbal supplements (15% vs 88%, p=0.0007). Alarmingly, 81.1% received no pre-transplant education, and 70.4% received no post-transplant care, despite 81% desiring guidance from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS Herbal supplement use among transplant recipients in Saudi Arabia is prevalent and risky due to potential drug interactions. Most patients lack education about these risks, underscoring the need for improved healthcare education.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e947275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbal Medicine Use Among Transplant Recipients in Saudi Arabia: Prevalence and Risk Awareness.\",\"authors\":\"Bassem A Almalki, Fawaz M Alotaibi, Mohammed Aldholmi, Yousef S Alqarni, Sawsan M Kurdi, Mohammed M Alsultan, Wafa A Alzlaiq, Mansour M Alotaibi, Noor M Alashi, Fatimah S Alzahrani, Nouf E Alotaibi, Mohamed A Albekery, Sarah A Albilal, Khawla M Kahtani, Mohammed Abdelgawad Gafar, Sahar M Al-Mowaina, Ahmed K Alalawi, Abdullah A Alshehab, Ahmed J Aljasem, Abdulkareem M Albekairy\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/AOT.947275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Herbal medicine is commonly used in Saudi Arabia, and is widely viewed as natural and safe. However, its use among transplant recipients poses risks due to interactions with immunosuppressive therapies. This study explores herbal medicine use, knowledge, and attitudes among Saudi transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study of 203 transplant recipients from multiple clinics in Saudi Arabia was conducted using a structured questionnaire to assess demographics, herbal supplement use, awareness of risks, and attitudes. Statistical analyses compared users and non-users of herbal supplements. RESULTS Post-transplant herbal supplement use decreased significantly (44.3% to 19.2%, p=0.0001). Many relied on unreliable sources like friends or the internet, and 54.24% of reported supplements posed interaction risks with immunosuppressive drugs. Participants aware of these risks were significantly less likely to use herbal supplements (15% vs 88%, p=0.0007). Alarmingly, 81.1% received no pre-transplant education, and 70.4% received no post-transplant care, despite 81% desiring guidance from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS Herbal supplement use among transplant recipients in Saudi Arabia is prevalent and risky due to potential drug interactions. Most patients lack education about these risks, underscoring the need for improved healthcare education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e947275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.947275\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.947275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
草药在沙特阿拉伯被广泛使用,并且被广泛认为是天然和安全的。然而,由于与免疫抑制疗法的相互作用,它在移植受者中的使用存在风险。本研究探讨了沙特移植受者的草药使用、知识和态度。材料和方法对来自沙特阿拉伯多家诊所的203名移植受者进行了横断面研究,使用结构化问卷来评估人口统计学、草药补充剂的使用、风险意识和态度。统计分析比较了草药补充剂的使用者和非使用者。结果移植后草药补充剂的使用明显减少(44.3% ~ 19.2%,p=0.0001)。许多人依赖朋友或互联网等不可靠的来源,54.24%的补充剂报告存在与免疫抑制药物相互作用的风险。意识到这些风险的参与者使用草药补充剂的可能性显著降低(15% vs 88%, p=0.0007)。令人震惊的是,81.1%的人没有接受移植前教育,70.4%的人没有接受移植后护理,尽管81%的人希望得到医疗保健提供者的指导。结论:由于潜在的药物相互作用,在沙特阿拉伯的移植受者中使用草药补充剂是普遍和危险的。大多数患者缺乏关于这些风险的教育,强调了改善医疗保健教育的必要性。
Herbal Medicine Use Among Transplant Recipients in Saudi Arabia: Prevalence and Risk Awareness.
BACKGROUND Herbal medicine is commonly used in Saudi Arabia, and is widely viewed as natural and safe. However, its use among transplant recipients poses risks due to interactions with immunosuppressive therapies. This study explores herbal medicine use, knowledge, and attitudes among Saudi transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study of 203 transplant recipients from multiple clinics in Saudi Arabia was conducted using a structured questionnaire to assess demographics, herbal supplement use, awareness of risks, and attitudes. Statistical analyses compared users and non-users of herbal supplements. RESULTS Post-transplant herbal supplement use decreased significantly (44.3% to 19.2%, p=0.0001). Many relied on unreliable sources like friends or the internet, and 54.24% of reported supplements posed interaction risks with immunosuppressive drugs. Participants aware of these risks were significantly less likely to use herbal supplements (15% vs 88%, p=0.0007). Alarmingly, 81.1% received no pre-transplant education, and 70.4% received no post-transplant care, despite 81% desiring guidance from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS Herbal supplement use among transplant recipients in Saudi Arabia is prevalent and risky due to potential drug interactions. Most patients lack education about these risks, underscoring the need for improved healthcare education.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation.
Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication.
Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.