Ziying Lei, Yue Wang, Runya Fang, Ke Wang, Jun Tian, Yangxiao Chen, Yingsi Wang, Jiali Luo, Jinfu He, Binghui Ding, Xianzi Yang, Li Wang, Shuzhong Cui, Hongsheng Tang, the Chinese Peritoneal Oncology Study group (Gynecologic Oncology Study group)
{"title":"III期上皮性卵巢癌术前细胞减少手术后的腹腔内高温化疗:长期生存随访。","authors":"Ziying Lei, Yue Wang, Runya Fang, Ke Wang, Jun Tian, Yangxiao Chen, Yingsi Wang, Jiali Luo, Jinfu He, Binghui Ding, Xianzi Yang, Li Wang, Shuzhong Cui, Hongsheng Tang, the Chinese Peritoneal Oncology Study group (Gynecologic Oncology Study group)","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The survival benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been well defined at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery, but the role of HIPEC remains uncertain for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in the upfront setting. The present study aimed to report the updated long-term survival outcomes after 5 years of follow-up from our previous multicenter retrospective cohort study to compare primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) plus HIPEC with PCS alone among women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted at five high-volume gynecological medical centers in China from January 2010 to May 2017. Eligible patients with complete data were treated with either PCS combined with HIPEC or PCS alone. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was updated to compare PCS plus HIPEC with PCS alone. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method based on a propensity score model for each patient was used to control the confounding factors and evaluate the effect of HIPEC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data from 789 patients, a total of 584 eligible stage III epithelial ovarian cancer patients were ultimately included in the analysis (PCS-plus-HIPEC group, <i>n</i> = 425; PCS-alone group, <i>n</i> = 159). After IPTW adjustment, the median OS was 44.5 (95% CI, 40.1–49.1) months in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and 32.4 (95% CI, 28.8–40.3) months in the PCS-alone group (weighted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.006). At 5 years, the OS rates were 37.9% (95% CI, 33.0%–42.8%) in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and 26.4% (95% CI, 18.9%–34.6%) in the PCS-alone group (<i>p</i> = 0.007). After stratification into optimal and suboptimal cytoreduction subgroups, patients in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group maintained a greater association with improved OS than those in the PCS-alone group. Among the women who underwent optimal cytoreduction in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and PCS-alone group, the median OS was 49.9 (95% CI, 45.2–58.4) months and 37.8 (95% CI, 30.5–53.0) months (<i>p</i> = 0.042) while the 5-year OS rate was 43.7% (95% CI, 37.7%–49.6%) and 33.2% (95% CI, 23.3%–43.5%), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.040). Meanwhile, for those treated with suboptimal cytoreduction subgroup in the PCS-plus-HIPEC and PCS-alone groups, the median OS was 28.4 (95% CI, 22.2–39.9) months and 20.6 (95% CI, 10.6–32.4) months (<i>p</i> = 0.099) while the 5-year OS rate was 22.4% (95% CI, 15.1%–30.5%) and 12.2% (95% CI, 4.4%–24.2%), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.060). The median follow-up period was 87.2 (95% CI, 85.1–92.7) months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The updated results indicate that the addition of HIPEC is associated with improved long-term survival outcomes beyond 5 years for patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer in the upfront setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"104 5","pages":"988-997"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.15094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after upfront cytoreductive surgery for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: Follow-up of long-term survival\",\"authors\":\"Ziying Lei, Yue Wang, Runya Fang, Ke Wang, Jun Tian, Yangxiao Chen, Yingsi Wang, Jiali Luo, Jinfu He, Binghui Ding, Xianzi Yang, Li Wang, Shuzhong Cui, Hongsheng Tang, the Chinese Peritoneal Oncology Study group (Gynecologic Oncology Study group)\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.15094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The survival benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been well defined at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery, but the role of HIPEC remains uncertain for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in the upfront setting. The present study aimed to report the updated long-term survival outcomes after 5 years of follow-up from our previous multicenter retrospective cohort study to compare primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) plus HIPEC with PCS alone among women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study was conducted at five high-volume gynecological medical centers in China from January 2010 to May 2017. Eligible patients with complete data were treated with either PCS combined with HIPEC or PCS alone. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was updated to compare PCS plus HIPEC with PCS alone. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method based on a propensity score model for each patient was used to control the confounding factors and evaluate the effect of HIPEC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from 789 patients, a total of 584 eligible stage III epithelial ovarian cancer patients were ultimately included in the analysis (PCS-plus-HIPEC group, <i>n</i> = 425; PCS-alone group, <i>n</i> = 159). After IPTW adjustment, the median OS was 44.5 (95% CI, 40.1–49.1) months in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and 32.4 (95% CI, 28.8–40.3) months in the PCS-alone group (weighted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.006). At 5 years, the OS rates were 37.9% (95% CI, 33.0%–42.8%) in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and 26.4% (95% CI, 18.9%–34.6%) in the PCS-alone group (<i>p</i> = 0.007). After stratification into optimal and suboptimal cytoreduction subgroups, patients in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group maintained a greater association with improved OS than those in the PCS-alone group. Among the women who underwent optimal cytoreduction in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and PCS-alone group, the median OS was 49.9 (95% CI, 45.2–58.4) months and 37.8 (95% CI, 30.5–53.0) months (<i>p</i> = 0.042) while the 5-year OS rate was 43.7% (95% CI, 37.7%–49.6%) and 33.2% (95% CI, 23.3%–43.5%), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.040). Meanwhile, for those treated with suboptimal cytoreduction subgroup in the PCS-plus-HIPEC and PCS-alone groups, the median OS was 28.4 (95% CI, 22.2–39.9) months and 20.6 (95% CI, 10.6–32.4) months (<i>p</i> = 0.099) while the 5-year OS rate was 22.4% (95% CI, 15.1%–30.5%) and 12.2% (95% CI, 4.4%–24.2%), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.060). The median follow-up period was 87.2 (95% CI, 85.1–92.7) months.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The updated results indicate that the addition of HIPEC is associated with improved long-term survival outcomes beyond 5 years for patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer in the upfront setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"988-997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.15094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.15094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.15094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after upfront cytoreductive surgery for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: Follow-up of long-term survival
Introduction
The survival benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been well defined at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery, but the role of HIPEC remains uncertain for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in the upfront setting. The present study aimed to report the updated long-term survival outcomes after 5 years of follow-up from our previous multicenter retrospective cohort study to compare primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) plus HIPEC with PCS alone among women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.
Material and Methods
This study was conducted at five high-volume gynecological medical centers in China from January 2010 to May 2017. Eligible patients with complete data were treated with either PCS combined with HIPEC or PCS alone. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was updated to compare PCS plus HIPEC with PCS alone. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method based on a propensity score model for each patient was used to control the confounding factors and evaluate the effect of HIPEC.
Results
Data from 789 patients, a total of 584 eligible stage III epithelial ovarian cancer patients were ultimately included in the analysis (PCS-plus-HIPEC group, n = 425; PCS-alone group, n = 159). After IPTW adjustment, the median OS was 44.5 (95% CI, 40.1–49.1) months in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and 32.4 (95% CI, 28.8–40.3) months in the PCS-alone group (weighted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.93; p = 0.006). At 5 years, the OS rates were 37.9% (95% CI, 33.0%–42.8%) in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and 26.4% (95% CI, 18.9%–34.6%) in the PCS-alone group (p = 0.007). After stratification into optimal and suboptimal cytoreduction subgroups, patients in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group maintained a greater association with improved OS than those in the PCS-alone group. Among the women who underwent optimal cytoreduction in the PCS-plus-HIPEC group and PCS-alone group, the median OS was 49.9 (95% CI, 45.2–58.4) months and 37.8 (95% CI, 30.5–53.0) months (p = 0.042) while the 5-year OS rate was 43.7% (95% CI, 37.7%–49.6%) and 33.2% (95% CI, 23.3%–43.5%), respectively (p = 0.040). Meanwhile, for those treated with suboptimal cytoreduction subgroup in the PCS-plus-HIPEC and PCS-alone groups, the median OS was 28.4 (95% CI, 22.2–39.9) months and 20.6 (95% CI, 10.6–32.4) months (p = 0.099) while the 5-year OS rate was 22.4% (95% CI, 15.1%–30.5%) and 12.2% (95% CI, 4.4%–24.2%), respectively (p = 0.060). The median follow-up period was 87.2 (95% CI, 85.1–92.7) months.
Conclusions
The updated results indicate that the addition of HIPEC is associated with improved long-term survival outcomes beyond 5 years for patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer in the upfront setting.
期刊介绍:
Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.