对艾滋病病毒感染者进行长效注射治疗教育的普遍途径。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bijou Hunt, Alice Pham, Nancy Glick, Sharon Sam, Keyang Ni, Kathrine Meyers, Nadia Nguyen
{"title":"对艾滋病病毒感染者进行长效注射治疗教育的普遍途径。","authors":"Bijou Hunt,&nbsp;Alice Pham,&nbsp;Nancy Glick,&nbsp;Sharon Sam,&nbsp;Keyang Ni,&nbsp;Kathrine Meyers,&nbsp;Nadia Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s10461-024-04610-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI ART) has the potential to transform HIV care and reduce HIV-related health inequities in achieving and maintaining viral suppression. However, without a plan for equitable roll-out of LAI ART, new pharmacological innovations in HIV treatment and prevention risk further deepening health disparities. This study delineates a process for providing universal LAI ART education to people with HIV (PWH) at an urban outpatient infectious disease clinic and documents the outcomes of these efforts. We compared the number and proportion of patients with HIV educated about injectable cabotegravir–rilpivirine (iCAB/RPV) and, among those educated, the number and proportion of patients interested in learning more about iCAB/RPV under a selective education model compared to a universal education model, disaggregated by race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used a Chi-sq test to estimate p-values for the difference in proportions. The universal compared to selective education approach resulted in a larger proportion of clients educated and a greater proportion of people educated reporting interest in LAI ART. Slight differences observed between those never versus ever educated in the selective education were absent after the adoption of a universal education approach. Reasons for disinterest -- including fear of injections, not interested in more frequent clinic visits, and content with oral ART regimen -- did not differ across educational approaches. Our programmatic data offers preliminary evidence that a universal education approach can support and enhance equitable roll-out of LAI ART. Most patients with HIV are interested in learning more about LAI ART.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":"29 5","pages":"1704 - 1712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Universal Approach to Educating Patients with HIV about Long-Acting Injectable Treatment for HIV\",\"authors\":\"Bijou Hunt,&nbsp;Alice Pham,&nbsp;Nancy Glick,&nbsp;Sharon Sam,&nbsp;Keyang Ni,&nbsp;Kathrine Meyers,&nbsp;Nadia Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10461-024-04610-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI ART) has the potential to transform HIV care and reduce HIV-related health inequities in achieving and maintaining viral suppression. However, without a plan for equitable roll-out of LAI ART, new pharmacological innovations in HIV treatment and prevention risk further deepening health disparities. This study delineates a process for providing universal LAI ART education to people with HIV (PWH) at an urban outpatient infectious disease clinic and documents the outcomes of these efforts. We compared the number and proportion of patients with HIV educated about injectable cabotegravir–rilpivirine (iCAB/RPV) and, among those educated, the number and proportion of patients interested in learning more about iCAB/RPV under a selective education model compared to a universal education model, disaggregated by race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used a Chi-sq test to estimate p-values for the difference in proportions. The universal compared to selective education approach resulted in a larger proportion of clients educated and a greater proportion of people educated reporting interest in LAI ART. Slight differences observed between those never versus ever educated in the selective education were absent after the adoption of a universal education approach. Reasons for disinterest -- including fear of injections, not interested in more frequent clinic visits, and content with oral ART regimen -- did not differ across educational approaches. Our programmatic data offers preliminary evidence that a universal education approach can support and enhance equitable roll-out of LAI ART. Most patients with HIV are interested in learning more about LAI ART.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"1704 - 1712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-024-04610-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-024-04610-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长效注射抗逆转录病毒治疗有可能改变艾滋病毒护理,减少在实现和维持病毒抑制方面与艾滋病毒相关的卫生不公平现象。然而,如果没有公平推广低水平抗逆转录病毒药物的计划,艾滋病毒治疗和预防方面的新药理学创新就有可能进一步加深健康差距。本研究描述了在城市门诊传染病诊所向艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)提供普遍的LAI ART教育的过程,并记录了这些努力的结果。我们比较了接受注射用卡博地韦-利匹韦林(iCAB/RPV)知识教育的HIV患者的数量和比例,以及在接受教育的患者中,有兴趣在选择性教育模式下学习更多iCAB/RPV知识的患者的数量和比例,并按种族/民族、性别和年龄分类。我们使用卡方检验来估计比例差异的p值。与选择性教育方法相比,普遍教育方法导致更大比例的受过教育的客户和更大比例的受过教育的人报告对LAI ART感兴趣。在采用普及教育方法后,从未接受过选择性教育的人与接受过选择性教育的人之间的细微差异不复存在。不感兴趣的原因——包括害怕注射,对更频繁的诊所就诊不感兴趣,以及对口服抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的满意——在不同的教育方法中没有差异。我们的规划数据提供了初步证据,表明普及教育方法可以支持和促进公平推广低水平抗逆转录病毒药物。大多数艾滋病毒患者有兴趣了解更多有关LAI ART的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Universal Approach to Educating Patients with HIV about Long-Acting Injectable Treatment for HIV

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI ART) has the potential to transform HIV care and reduce HIV-related health inequities in achieving and maintaining viral suppression. However, without a plan for equitable roll-out of LAI ART, new pharmacological innovations in HIV treatment and prevention risk further deepening health disparities. This study delineates a process for providing universal LAI ART education to people with HIV (PWH) at an urban outpatient infectious disease clinic and documents the outcomes of these efforts. We compared the number and proportion of patients with HIV educated about injectable cabotegravir–rilpivirine (iCAB/RPV) and, among those educated, the number and proportion of patients interested in learning more about iCAB/RPV under a selective education model compared to a universal education model, disaggregated by race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used a Chi-sq test to estimate p-values for the difference in proportions. The universal compared to selective education approach resulted in a larger proportion of clients educated and a greater proportion of people educated reporting interest in LAI ART. Slight differences observed between those never versus ever educated in the selective education were absent after the adoption of a universal education approach. Reasons for disinterest -- including fear of injections, not interested in more frequent clinic visits, and content with oral ART regimen -- did not differ across educational approaches. Our programmatic data offers preliminary evidence that a universal education approach can support and enhance equitable roll-out of LAI ART. Most patients with HIV are interested in learning more about LAI ART.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信