法国私人航空的自愿事件反馈。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Raphaël Demoulin, Christophe Stalars
{"title":"法国私人航空的自愿事件反馈。","authors":"Raphaël Demoulin, Christophe Stalars","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6574.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In private aviation, procedures for collecting feedback have been established to gather information about unsafe situations related to aircraft use. The REX FFA system, which stands for \"Feedback from the French Aeronautical Federation,\" allows French private pilots to report accidents, incidents, and hazardous events to increase flight safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study explores feedback from the REX FFA system to understand the human factors influencing flight safety. We retrospectively analyzed, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, 150 reports submitted between September 2023 and February 2024. Key lessons were also extracted from each report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most incidents (64%) involved human factors. Using the HFACS model, we identified 99 unsafe acts, 150 preconditions for unsafe acts, 21 instances of unsafe supervision, and 24 organizational failures. Skill-based errors were the most common unsafe act. Key lessons emphasized the importance of proactive visual scanning, thorough flight preparation, and strict adherence to checklists.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights the predominance of human error in general aviation incidents. The data collected through the REX FFA system suggest it could be an effective educational tool, enabling pilots to share and learn from their experiences and providing valuable data for proactive corrective measures. Promoting similar systems dedicated to recreational private aviation could further benefit general aviation safety worldwide. Demoulin R, Stalars C. Voluntary incident feedback in French private aviation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(3):228-233.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"96 3","pages":"228-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary Incident Feedback in French Private Aviation.\",\"authors\":\"Raphaël Demoulin, Christophe Stalars\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/AMHP.6574.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In private aviation, procedures for collecting feedback have been established to gather information about unsafe situations related to aircraft use. The REX FFA system, which stands for \\\"Feedback from the French Aeronautical Federation,\\\" allows French private pilots to report accidents, incidents, and hazardous events to increase flight safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study explores feedback from the REX FFA system to understand the human factors influencing flight safety. We retrospectively analyzed, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, 150 reports submitted between September 2023 and February 2024. Key lessons were also extracted from each report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most incidents (64%) involved human factors. Using the HFACS model, we identified 99 unsafe acts, 150 preconditions for unsafe acts, 21 instances of unsafe supervision, and 24 organizational failures. Skill-based errors were the most common unsafe act. Key lessons emphasized the importance of proactive visual scanning, thorough flight preparation, and strict adherence to checklists.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights the predominance of human error in general aviation incidents. The data collected through the REX FFA system suggest it could be an effective educational tool, enabling pilots to share and learn from their experiences and providing valuable data for proactive corrective measures. Promoting similar systems dedicated to recreational private aviation could further benefit general aviation safety worldwide. Demoulin R, Stalars C. Voluntary incident feedback in French private aviation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(3):228-233.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"volume\":\"96 3\",\"pages\":\"228-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6574.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6574.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在私人航空中,已经建立了收集反馈的程序,以收集与飞机使用有关的不安全情况的信息。REX FFA系统代表“法国航空联合会的反馈”,允许法国私人飞行员报告事故、事件和危险事件,以提高飞行安全。方法:利用REX FFA系统的反馈信息,了解影响飞行安全的人为因素。我们使用人为因素分析和分类系统对2023年9月至2024年2月间提交的150份报告进行回顾性分析。还从每份报告中摘录了重要的经验教训。结果:大多数事件(64%)涉及人为因素。使用HFACS模型,我们确定了99个不安全行为,150个不安全行为的前提条件,21个不安全监管实例和24个组织失败。基于技能的错误是最常见的不安全行为。关键的教训强调了积极主动的视觉扫描,彻底的飞行准备和严格遵守检查清单的重要性。讨论:本研究强调了在通用航空事故中人为错误的主导地位。通过REX FFA系统收集的数据表明,它可以成为一种有效的教育工具,使飞行员能够分享和学习他们的经验,并为主动纠正措施提供有价值的数据。推广专门用于娱乐私人航空的类似系统可以进一步促进全球通用航空安全。李建军,李建军,李建军,等。航空事故反馈研究进展。航空航天Med Hum Perform. 2025;96(3): 228 - 233。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Voluntary Incident Feedback in French Private Aviation.

Introduction: In private aviation, procedures for collecting feedback have been established to gather information about unsafe situations related to aircraft use. The REX FFA system, which stands for "Feedback from the French Aeronautical Federation," allows French private pilots to report accidents, incidents, and hazardous events to increase flight safety.

Methods: This study explores feedback from the REX FFA system to understand the human factors influencing flight safety. We retrospectively analyzed, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, 150 reports submitted between September 2023 and February 2024. Key lessons were also extracted from each report.

Results: Most incidents (64%) involved human factors. Using the HFACS model, we identified 99 unsafe acts, 150 preconditions for unsafe acts, 21 instances of unsafe supervision, and 24 organizational failures. Skill-based errors were the most common unsafe act. Key lessons emphasized the importance of proactive visual scanning, thorough flight preparation, and strict adherence to checklists.

Discussion: This study highlights the predominance of human error in general aviation incidents. The data collected through the REX FFA system suggest it could be an effective educational tool, enabling pilots to share and learn from their experiences and providing valuable data for proactive corrective measures. Promoting similar systems dedicated to recreational private aviation could further benefit general aviation safety worldwide. Demoulin R, Stalars C. Voluntary incident feedback in French private aviation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(3):228-233.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信