遗传基因变异与多发性原发性黑色素瘤的关系。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
David C Gibbs, Brittany M Small, Isidora Autuori, Siok F Leong, Emily Ali, Jessica Kenney, Li Luo, Peter A Kanetsky, Klaus J Busam, Anne E Cust, Hoda Anton-Culver, Richard P Gallagher, Roberto Zanetti, Stefano Rosso, Lidia Sacchetto, Sharon N Edmiston, Kathleen Conway, David W Ollila, Colin B Begg, Marianne Berwick, Irene Orlow, Nancy E Thomas
{"title":"遗传基因变异与多发性原发性黑色素瘤的关系。","authors":"David C Gibbs, Brittany M Small, Isidora Autuori, Siok F Leong, Emily Ali, Jessica Kenney, Li Luo, Peter A Kanetsky, Klaus J Busam, Anne E Cust, Hoda Anton-Culver, Richard P Gallagher, Roberto Zanetti, Stefano Rosso, Lidia Sacchetto, Sharon N Edmiston, Kathleen Conway, David W Ollila, Colin B Begg, Marianne Berwick, Irene Orlow, Nancy E Thomas","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified new susceptibility loci for melanoma, but their associations with multiple primary melanoma (MPM) are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the associations of 69 SNPs in 39 GWAS-identified loci with odds of MPM relative to single primary melanoma in the international, population-based Genes, Environment, and Melanoma study. Per-minor-allele ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for individuals with MPM \"cases\" (n = 1,205) relative to single primary melanoma \"controls\" (n = 2,458) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated and weighted based on a 2020 GWAS meta-analysis (57 of the 68 independent GWAS SNPs available).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen SNPs in 11 gene regions (PARP1, CYP1B1/RMDN3, TERT, RAPGEF5, TYRP1, MTAP, CDKN2A/CDKN2B, KLF4, TYR, SOX6, and ASIP) were statistically significantly associated (P < 0.05) with MPM adjusting for age, sex, age-by-sex interaction, and study center. The highest versus lowest PRS quintile was associated with a 2.81-fold higher odds of MPM (95% CI, 2.10-3.78; P = 7.5 × 10-13); this association was attenuated but remained statistically significant after excluding SNPs individually associated with MPM (OR = 1.75, 95% CI, 1.32-2.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inherited genetic variants spanning 11 gene regions were independently associated with MPM. Nonsignificant SNPs were associated with MPM when aggregated into a PRS, indicating that their cumulative effect may influence MPM risk despite lacking individual statistical significance in our study population.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our findings provide additional evidence that these loci are associated with melanoma risk and estimate the magnitude of their genetic effect on subsequent (multiple) primary melanoma risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"805-814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Inherited Genetic Variants with Multiple Primary Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"David C Gibbs, Brittany M Small, Isidora Autuori, Siok F Leong, Emily Ali, Jessica Kenney, Li Luo, Peter A Kanetsky, Klaus J Busam, Anne E Cust, Hoda Anton-Culver, Richard P Gallagher, Roberto Zanetti, Stefano Rosso, Lidia Sacchetto, Sharon N Edmiston, Kathleen Conway, David W Ollila, Colin B Begg, Marianne Berwick, Irene Orlow, Nancy E Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified new susceptibility loci for melanoma, but their associations with multiple primary melanoma (MPM) are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the associations of 69 SNPs in 39 GWAS-identified loci with odds of MPM relative to single primary melanoma in the international, population-based Genes, Environment, and Melanoma study. Per-minor-allele ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for individuals with MPM \\\"cases\\\" (n = 1,205) relative to single primary melanoma \\\"controls\\\" (n = 2,458) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated and weighted based on a 2020 GWAS meta-analysis (57 of the 68 independent GWAS SNPs available).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen SNPs in 11 gene regions (PARP1, CYP1B1/RMDN3, TERT, RAPGEF5, TYRP1, MTAP, CDKN2A/CDKN2B, KLF4, TYR, SOX6, and ASIP) were statistically significantly associated (P < 0.05) with MPM adjusting for age, sex, age-by-sex interaction, and study center. The highest versus lowest PRS quintile was associated with a 2.81-fold higher odds of MPM (95% CI, 2.10-3.78; P = 7.5 × 10-13); this association was attenuated but remained statistically significant after excluding SNPs individually associated with MPM (OR = 1.75, 95% CI, 1.32-2.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inherited genetic variants spanning 11 gene regions were independently associated with MPM. Nonsignificant SNPs were associated with MPM when aggregated into a PRS, indicating that their cumulative effect may influence MPM risk despite lacking individual statistical significance in our study population.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our findings provide additional evidence that these loci are associated with melanoma risk and estimate the magnitude of their genetic effect on subsequent (multiple) primary melanoma risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"805-814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1442\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经确定了黑色素瘤的新易感位点,但它们与多发性原发性黑色素瘤(MPM)的关系尚不清楚。方法:我们在国际上基于人群的基因、环境和黑色素瘤(GEM)研究中调查了39个gwas鉴定的位点中69个单核苷酸多态性(snp)与MPM相对于单一原发性黑色素瘤(SPM)的几率之间的关系。使用多变量logistic回归估计MPM“病例”个体(n= 1205)相对于SPM“对照组”(n= 2458)的每次要等位基因比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci),并根据2020年GWAS荟萃分析(68个独立GWAS snp中的57个可用)计算多基因风险评分(PRS)并进行加权。结果:11个基因区域(PARP1、CYP1B1/RMDN3、TERT、RAPGEF5、TYRP1、MTAP、CDKN2A/CDKN2B、KLF4、TYR、SOX6、ASIP)的13个snp与MPM的相关性具有统计学意义(p结论:跨越11个基因区域的遗传变异与MPM独立相关。非显著snp与MPM相关,当聚合成PRS时,表明它们的累积效应可能影响MPM风险,尽管在我们的研究人群中缺乏个体统计意义。影响:我们的研究结果提供了额外的证据,证明这些基因座与黑色素瘤风险相关,并估计了它们对随后(多重)原发性黑色素瘤风险的遗传影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Inherited Genetic Variants with Multiple Primary Melanoma.

Background: Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified new susceptibility loci for melanoma, but their associations with multiple primary melanoma (MPM) are unclear.

Methods: We investigated the associations of 69 SNPs in 39 GWAS-identified loci with odds of MPM relative to single primary melanoma in the international, population-based Genes, Environment, and Melanoma study. Per-minor-allele ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for individuals with MPM "cases" (n = 1,205) relative to single primary melanoma "controls" (n = 2,458) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated and weighted based on a 2020 GWAS meta-analysis (57 of the 68 independent GWAS SNPs available).

Results: Thirteen SNPs in 11 gene regions (PARP1, CYP1B1/RMDN3, TERT, RAPGEF5, TYRP1, MTAP, CDKN2A/CDKN2B, KLF4, TYR, SOX6, and ASIP) were statistically significantly associated (P < 0.05) with MPM adjusting for age, sex, age-by-sex interaction, and study center. The highest versus lowest PRS quintile was associated with a 2.81-fold higher odds of MPM (95% CI, 2.10-3.78; P = 7.5 × 10-13); this association was attenuated but remained statistically significant after excluding SNPs individually associated with MPM (OR = 1.75, 95% CI, 1.32-2.31).

Conclusions: Inherited genetic variants spanning 11 gene regions were independently associated with MPM. Nonsignificant SNPs were associated with MPM when aggregated into a PRS, indicating that their cumulative effect may influence MPM risk despite lacking individual statistical significance in our study population.

Impact: Our findings provide additional evidence that these loci are associated with melanoma risk and estimate the magnitude of their genetic effect on subsequent (multiple) primary melanoma risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信