小学科学课堂实施探究性实践作业的教学体会

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Patricia Photo
{"title":"小学科学课堂实施探究性实践作业的教学体会","authors":"Patricia Photo","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10235-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates how teaching experience influences the design and implementation of inquiry-based practical work in South African primary science classrooms. Conducted in Gauteng, it features two novice and two experienced teachers, employing a qualitative approach with interpretive principles. Thematic analysis was utilized to analyse data collected from the interviews, classroom observations and worksheets. Findings reveal that novice teachers demonstrate competence in foundational aspects but have the potential for growth in fostering deeper inquiry, resource integration, and safety protocol incorporation. In contrast, experienced teachers exhibit proficiency in advanced inquiry practices, comprehensive lesson planning, and effective group management. Novice teachers tend towards confirmatory and structured inquiry, while experienced teachers use direct and open inquiry strategies. Both groups integrate formative assessments, emphasizing continuous assessment in the evaluation phase. The study contributes insights for targeted professional development, emphasizing the need to enhance science education practices in primary classrooms. Further research is recommended, particularly in resource-constrained primary schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Experiences Connected To The Implementation Of Inquiry-Based Practical Work In Primary Science Classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Photo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11165-025-10235-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates how teaching experience influences the design and implementation of inquiry-based practical work in South African primary science classrooms. Conducted in Gauteng, it features two novice and two experienced teachers, employing a qualitative approach with interpretive principles. Thematic analysis was utilized to analyse data collected from the interviews, classroom observations and worksheets. Findings reveal that novice teachers demonstrate competence in foundational aspects but have the potential for growth in fostering deeper inquiry, resource integration, and safety protocol incorporation. In contrast, experienced teachers exhibit proficiency in advanced inquiry practices, comprehensive lesson planning, and effective group management. Novice teachers tend towards confirmatory and structured inquiry, while experienced teachers use direct and open inquiry strategies. Both groups integrate formative assessments, emphasizing continuous assessment in the evaluation phase. The study contributes insights for targeted professional development, emphasizing the need to enhance science education practices in primary classrooms. Further research is recommended, particularly in resource-constrained primary schools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10235-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10235-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨教学经验如何影响南非小学科学课堂探究性实践作业的设计与实施。在豪登省进行,它的特点是两个新手和两个经验丰富的教师,采用定性的方法与解释原则。专题分析用于分析从访谈、课堂观察和工作表中收集的数据。研究结果显示,新教师在基础方面表现出能力,但在促进更深层次的探究、资源整合和安全协议整合方面具有增长潜力。相比之下,经验丰富的教师在高级探究实践、全面的课程计划和有效的小组管理方面表现出熟练程度。新手教师倾向于确认性和结构化的探究,而有经验的教师则使用直接和开放的探究策略。两组都整合了形成性评估,强调评估阶段的持续评估。该研究为有针对性的专业发展提供了见解,强调了加强小学课堂科学教育实践的必要性。建议进一步研究,特别是在资源有限的小学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching Experiences Connected To The Implementation Of Inquiry-Based Practical Work In Primary Science Classrooms

This study investigates how teaching experience influences the design and implementation of inquiry-based practical work in South African primary science classrooms. Conducted in Gauteng, it features two novice and two experienced teachers, employing a qualitative approach with interpretive principles. Thematic analysis was utilized to analyse data collected from the interviews, classroom observations and worksheets. Findings reveal that novice teachers demonstrate competence in foundational aspects but have the potential for growth in fostering deeper inquiry, resource integration, and safety protocol incorporation. In contrast, experienced teachers exhibit proficiency in advanced inquiry practices, comprehensive lesson planning, and effective group management. Novice teachers tend towards confirmatory and structured inquiry, while experienced teachers use direct and open inquiry strategies. Both groups integrate formative assessments, emphasizing continuous assessment in the evaluation phase. The study contributes insights for targeted professional development, emphasizing the need to enhance science education practices in primary classrooms. Further research is recommended, particularly in resource-constrained primary schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信