Karthik Anand, Vincent Olteanu, Chi Zhang, Katelynn Nelton, Erin Aakre, Juliana Perez Botero, Rajiv Pruthi, Dong Chen, Jansen N. Seheult
{"title":"自动血管性血友病因子多定时器图像分析改进血管性血友病的诊断和分类。","authors":"Karthik Anand, Vincent Olteanu, Chi Zhang, Katelynn Nelton, Erin Aakre, Juliana Perez Botero, Rajiv Pruthi, Dong Chen, Jansen N. Seheult","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis is essential for diagnosing and classifying von Willebrand disease (VWD) but requires expert interpretation and is subject to inter-rater variability. We developed an automated image analysis pipeline using deep learning to improve the reproducibility and efficiency of VWF multimer pattern classification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We trained a YOLOv8 deep learning model on 514 gel images (6168 labeled instances) to classify VWF multimer patterns into 12 classes. The model was validated on 192 images (2304 instances) and tested on an independent set of 94 images (1128 instances). Images underwent preprocessing, including histogram equalization, contrast enhancement, and gamma correction. Two expert raters provided ground truth classifications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The model achieved 91% accuracy compared to Expert 1 (macro-averaged precision = 0.851, recall = 0.757, F1-score = 0.786) and 87% accuracy compared to Expert 2 (macro-averaged precision = 0.653, recall = 0.653, F1-score = 0.641). Inter-rater agreement was very high between experts (<i>κ</i> = 0.883), with strong agreement between the model and Expert 1 (<i>κ</i> = 0.845) and good agreement with Expert 2 (<i>κ</i> = 0.773). The model performed exceptionally well on common patterns (F1 > 0.93) but showed lower performance on rare subtypes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Automated VWF multimer analysis using deep learning demonstrates high accuracy in pattern classification and could standardize the interpretation of VWF multimer patterns. While not replacing expert analysis, this approach could improve the efficiency of expert human review, potentially streamlining laboratory workflow and expanding access to VWF multimer testing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 4","pages":"730-737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Image Analysis for Improved Diagnosis and Classification of Von Willebrand Disease\",\"authors\":\"Karthik Anand, Vincent Olteanu, Chi Zhang, Katelynn Nelton, Erin Aakre, Juliana Perez Botero, Rajiv Pruthi, Dong Chen, Jansen N. Seheult\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis is essential for diagnosing and classifying von Willebrand disease (VWD) but requires expert interpretation and is subject to inter-rater variability. We developed an automated image analysis pipeline using deep learning to improve the reproducibility and efficiency of VWF multimer pattern classification.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We trained a YOLOv8 deep learning model on 514 gel images (6168 labeled instances) to classify VWF multimer patterns into 12 classes. The model was validated on 192 images (2304 instances) and tested on an independent set of 94 images (1128 instances). Images underwent preprocessing, including histogram equalization, contrast enhancement, and gamma correction. Two expert raters provided ground truth classifications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The model achieved 91% accuracy compared to Expert 1 (macro-averaged precision = 0.851, recall = 0.757, F1-score = 0.786) and 87% accuracy compared to Expert 2 (macro-averaged precision = 0.653, recall = 0.653, F1-score = 0.641). Inter-rater agreement was very high between experts (<i>κ</i> = 0.883), with strong agreement between the model and Expert 1 (<i>κ</i> = 0.845) and good agreement with Expert 2 (<i>κ</i> = 0.773). The model performed exceptionally well on common patterns (F1 > 0.93) but showed lower performance on rare subtypes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Automated VWF multimer analysis using deep learning demonstrates high accuracy in pattern classification and could standardize the interpretation of VWF multimer patterns. While not replacing expert analysis, this approach could improve the efficiency of expert human review, potentially streamlining laboratory workflow and expanding access to VWF multimer testing.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"730-737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14455\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Image Analysis for Improved Diagnosis and Classification of Von Willebrand Disease
Introduction
Von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis is essential for diagnosing and classifying von Willebrand disease (VWD) but requires expert interpretation and is subject to inter-rater variability. We developed an automated image analysis pipeline using deep learning to improve the reproducibility and efficiency of VWF multimer pattern classification.
Methods
We trained a YOLOv8 deep learning model on 514 gel images (6168 labeled instances) to classify VWF multimer patterns into 12 classes. The model was validated on 192 images (2304 instances) and tested on an independent set of 94 images (1128 instances). Images underwent preprocessing, including histogram equalization, contrast enhancement, and gamma correction. Two expert raters provided ground truth classifications.
Results
The model achieved 91% accuracy compared to Expert 1 (macro-averaged precision = 0.851, recall = 0.757, F1-score = 0.786) and 87% accuracy compared to Expert 2 (macro-averaged precision = 0.653, recall = 0.653, F1-score = 0.641). Inter-rater agreement was very high between experts (κ = 0.883), with strong agreement between the model and Expert 1 (κ = 0.845) and good agreement with Expert 2 (κ = 0.773). The model performed exceptionally well on common patterns (F1 > 0.93) but showed lower performance on rare subtypes.
Conclusion
Automated VWF multimer analysis using deep learning demonstrates high accuracy in pattern classification and could standardize the interpretation of VWF multimer patterns. While not replacing expert analysis, this approach could improve the efficiency of expert human review, potentially streamlining laboratory workflow and expanding access to VWF multimer testing.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology.
The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence.
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines.
The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.