自动血管性血友病因子多定时器图像分析改进血管性血友病的诊断和分类。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Karthik Anand, Vincent Olteanu, Chi Zhang, Katelynn Nelton, Erin Aakre, Juliana Perez Botero, Rajiv Pruthi, Dong Chen, Jansen N. Seheult
{"title":"自动血管性血友病因子多定时器图像分析改进血管性血友病的诊断和分类。","authors":"Karthik Anand,&nbsp;Vincent Olteanu,&nbsp;Chi Zhang,&nbsp;Katelynn Nelton,&nbsp;Erin Aakre,&nbsp;Juliana Perez Botero,&nbsp;Rajiv Pruthi,&nbsp;Dong Chen,&nbsp;Jansen N. Seheult","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis is essential for diagnosing and classifying von Willebrand disease (VWD) but requires expert interpretation and is subject to inter-rater variability. We developed an automated image analysis pipeline using deep learning to improve the reproducibility and efficiency of VWF multimer pattern classification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We trained a YOLOv8 deep learning model on 514 gel images (6168 labeled instances) to classify VWF multimer patterns into 12 classes. The model was validated on 192 images (2304 instances) and tested on an independent set of 94 images (1128 instances). Images underwent preprocessing, including histogram equalization, contrast enhancement, and gamma correction. Two expert raters provided ground truth classifications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The model achieved 91% accuracy compared to Expert 1 (macro-averaged precision = 0.851, recall = 0.757, F1-score = 0.786) and 87% accuracy compared to Expert 2 (macro-averaged precision = 0.653, recall = 0.653, F1-score = 0.641). Inter-rater agreement was very high between experts (<i>κ</i> = 0.883), with strong agreement between the model and Expert 1 (<i>κ</i> = 0.845) and good agreement with Expert 2 (<i>κ</i> = 0.773). The model performed exceptionally well on common patterns (F1 &gt; 0.93) but showed lower performance on rare subtypes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Automated VWF multimer analysis using deep learning demonstrates high accuracy in pattern classification and could standardize the interpretation of VWF multimer patterns. While not replacing expert analysis, this approach could improve the efficiency of expert human review, potentially streamlining laboratory workflow and expanding access to VWF multimer testing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 4","pages":"730-737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Image Analysis for Improved Diagnosis and Classification of Von Willebrand Disease\",\"authors\":\"Karthik Anand,&nbsp;Vincent Olteanu,&nbsp;Chi Zhang,&nbsp;Katelynn Nelton,&nbsp;Erin Aakre,&nbsp;Juliana Perez Botero,&nbsp;Rajiv Pruthi,&nbsp;Dong Chen,&nbsp;Jansen N. Seheult\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis is essential for diagnosing and classifying von Willebrand disease (VWD) but requires expert interpretation and is subject to inter-rater variability. We developed an automated image analysis pipeline using deep learning to improve the reproducibility and efficiency of VWF multimer pattern classification.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We trained a YOLOv8 deep learning model on 514 gel images (6168 labeled instances) to classify VWF multimer patterns into 12 classes. The model was validated on 192 images (2304 instances) and tested on an independent set of 94 images (1128 instances). Images underwent preprocessing, including histogram equalization, contrast enhancement, and gamma correction. Two expert raters provided ground truth classifications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The model achieved 91% accuracy compared to Expert 1 (macro-averaged precision = 0.851, recall = 0.757, F1-score = 0.786) and 87% accuracy compared to Expert 2 (macro-averaged precision = 0.653, recall = 0.653, F1-score = 0.641). Inter-rater agreement was very high between experts (<i>κ</i> = 0.883), with strong agreement between the model and Expert 1 (<i>κ</i> = 0.845) and good agreement with Expert 2 (<i>κ</i> = 0.773). The model performed exceptionally well on common patterns (F1 &gt; 0.93) but showed lower performance on rare subtypes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Automated VWF multimer analysis using deep learning demonstrates high accuracy in pattern classification and could standardize the interpretation of VWF multimer patterns. While not replacing expert analysis, this approach could improve the efficiency of expert human review, potentially streamlining laboratory workflow and expanding access to VWF multimer testing.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"730-737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14455\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血管性血友病因子(VWF)的多重分析对于血管性血友病(VWD)的诊断和分类是必不可少的,但需要专家解释,并受到不同评分者的差异。为了提高VWF多时间模式分类的可重复性和效率,我们开发了一个使用深度学习的自动图像分析流水线。方法:在514张凝胶图像(6168个标记实例)上训练YOLOv8深度学习模型,将VWF多定时器模式分为12类。该模型在192张图像(2304个实例)上进行了验证,并在一组独立的94张图像(1128个实例)上进行了测试。图像经过预处理,包括直方图均衡化、对比度增强和伽马校正。两名专家评价者提供了基本真相分类。结果:与Expert 1(宏观平均精度= 0.851,召回率= 0.757,F1-score = 0.786)相比,模型的准确率为91%;与Expert 2(宏观平均精度= 0.653,召回率= 0.653,F1-score = 0.641)相比,模型的准确率为87%。专家间的一致性非常高(κ = 0.883),其中模型与专家1的一致性很强(κ = 0.845),与专家2的一致性很好(κ = 0.773)。该模型在常见模式(F1 > 0.93)上表现特别好,但在罕见亚型上表现较差。结论:基于深度学习的VWF多定时器自动分析在模式分类上具有较高的准确性,可以规范VWF多定时器模式的解释。虽然不能取代专家分析,但这种方法可以提高专家人工审查的效率,潜在地简化实验室工作流程并扩大VWF多时间测试的访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Image Analysis for Improved Diagnosis and Classification of Von Willebrand Disease

Introduction

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis is essential for diagnosing and classifying von Willebrand disease (VWD) but requires expert interpretation and is subject to inter-rater variability. We developed an automated image analysis pipeline using deep learning to improve the reproducibility and efficiency of VWF multimer pattern classification.

Methods

We trained a YOLOv8 deep learning model on 514 gel images (6168 labeled instances) to classify VWF multimer patterns into 12 classes. The model was validated on 192 images (2304 instances) and tested on an independent set of 94 images (1128 instances). Images underwent preprocessing, including histogram equalization, contrast enhancement, and gamma correction. Two expert raters provided ground truth classifications.

Results

The model achieved 91% accuracy compared to Expert 1 (macro-averaged precision = 0.851, recall = 0.757, F1-score = 0.786) and 87% accuracy compared to Expert 2 (macro-averaged precision = 0.653, recall = 0.653, F1-score = 0.641). Inter-rater agreement was very high between experts (κ = 0.883), with strong agreement between the model and Expert 1 (κ = 0.845) and good agreement with Expert 2 (κ = 0.773). The model performed exceptionally well on common patterns (F1 > 0.93) but showed lower performance on rare subtypes.

Conclusion

Automated VWF multimer analysis using deep learning demonstrates high accuracy in pattern classification and could standardize the interpretation of VWF multimer patterns. While not replacing expert analysis, this approach could improve the efficiency of expert human review, potentially streamlining laboratory workflow and expanding access to VWF multimer testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信