探索临床科学家角色对其所在医疗服务机构的独特价值:范围界定综述。

Peter Buttrum, Prudence Butler, Adrienne Young, Diann Eley, Shaun O'Leary
{"title":"探索临床科学家角色对其所在医疗服务机构的独特价值:范围界定综述。","authors":"Peter Buttrum, Prudence Butler, Adrienne Young, Diann Eley, Shaun O'Leary","doi":"10.1071/AH24231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This scoping review explored the unique value or impacts of clinician scientists (CSs) to the health services in which they work and metrics used to identify and measure this value. Methods Five databases, grey literature, and the internet were searched in April 2024 to identify articles that described and measured the value or impact of CSs within clinical health services. CSs were defined as having dual clinical and research qualifications and work duties. Articles were screened at title, abstract, and full text level against inclusion and exclusion criteria, before extracting data and analysing the included articles. Results The search identified 5368 articles, with six eligible for inclusion. Articles were qualitative in nature (structured interviews or multiple case study reports) and had relatively few participants. The reported value or impacts included educating colleagues on research skills and processes, promoting evidence-based practice, fostering inter-institutional collaboration, and conducting clinically relevant research. No articles recommended a detailed suite of metrics as to how this value or impact could be measured. Conclusions There is limited literature describing the unique value or impact of CSs to the health services in which they work. While some articles described aspects of CS value, no articles provided metrics for how specific CS value could be measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the unique value of clinician scientist roles to the health services in which they are employed: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Buttrum, Prudence Butler, Adrienne Young, Diann Eley, Shaun O'Leary\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH24231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective This scoping review explored the unique value or impacts of clinician scientists (CSs) to the health services in which they work and metrics used to identify and measure this value. Methods Five databases, grey literature, and the internet were searched in April 2024 to identify articles that described and measured the value or impact of CSs within clinical health services. CSs were defined as having dual clinical and research qualifications and work duties. Articles were screened at title, abstract, and full text level against inclusion and exclusion criteria, before extracting data and analysing the included articles. Results The search identified 5368 articles, with six eligible for inclusion. Articles were qualitative in nature (structured interviews or multiple case study reports) and had relatively few participants. The reported value or impacts included educating colleagues on research skills and processes, promoting evidence-based practice, fostering inter-institutional collaboration, and conducting clinically relevant research. No articles recommended a detailed suite of metrics as to how this value or impact could be measured. Conclusions There is limited literature describing the unique value or impact of CSs to the health services in which they work. While some articles described aspects of CS value, no articles provided metrics for how specific CS value could be measured.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述探讨了临床科学家(CSs)对他们工作的卫生服务的独特价值或影响,以及用于识别和衡量这种价值的指标。方法于2024年4月检索5个数据库、灰色文献和互联网,以确定描述和衡量CSs在临床卫生服务中的价值或影响的文章。CSs被定义为具有临床和研究双重资格和工作职责。在提取数据和分析纳入的文章之前,根据纳入和排除标准对文章的标题、摘要和全文进行筛选。结果检索到5368篇文章,其中6篇符合纳入条件。文章本质上是定性的(结构化访谈或多个案例研究报告),参与者相对较少。报告的价值或影响包括教育同事研究技能和流程,促进循证实践,促进机构间合作以及开展临床相关研究。没有文章推荐一套详细的度量标准来衡量这个价值或影响。结论有限的文献描述了CSs对其工作的卫生服务的独特价值或影响。虽然有些文章描述了CS价值的各个方面,但没有文章提供了如何测量特定CS价值的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the unique value of clinician scientist roles to the health services in which they are employed: a scoping review.

Objective This scoping review explored the unique value or impacts of clinician scientists (CSs) to the health services in which they work and metrics used to identify and measure this value. Methods Five databases, grey literature, and the internet were searched in April 2024 to identify articles that described and measured the value or impact of CSs within clinical health services. CSs were defined as having dual clinical and research qualifications and work duties. Articles were screened at title, abstract, and full text level against inclusion and exclusion criteria, before extracting data and analysing the included articles. Results The search identified 5368 articles, with six eligible for inclusion. Articles were qualitative in nature (structured interviews or multiple case study reports) and had relatively few participants. The reported value or impacts included educating colleagues on research skills and processes, promoting evidence-based practice, fostering inter-institutional collaboration, and conducting clinically relevant research. No articles recommended a detailed suite of metrics as to how this value or impact could be measured. Conclusions There is limited literature describing the unique value or impact of CSs to the health services in which they work. While some articles described aspects of CS value, no articles provided metrics for how specific CS value could be measured.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信