心脏移植治疗心源性休克:有效策略还是“西班牙例外”?

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Francisco José Hernández-Pérez , Alba Martín-Centellas , Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte , Cristina Mitroi , Manuel Gómez-Bueno , Javier Segovia-Cubero
{"title":"心脏移植治疗心源性休克:有效策略还是“西班牙例外”?","authors":"Francisco José Hernández-Pérez ,&nbsp;Alba Martín-Centellas ,&nbsp;Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte ,&nbsp;Cristina Mitroi ,&nbsp;Manuel Gómez-Bueno ,&nbsp;Javier Segovia-Cubero","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiogenic shock remains one of the main challenges in modern cardiovascular medicine. In Spain, urgent cardiac transplantation is the most widely used heart replacement therapy fin eligible patients who do not achieve cardiac recovery. However, this approach has significant implications related to the principle of equity, influenced by the characteristics of the recipient, the donor, and organ access. When selecting a recipient, multiorgan failure must first be addressed before considering transplantation. At the same time, it is essential to expand the donor pool through various strategies to meet the growing demand, even if it involves using suboptimal organs. Given the scarcity of donors and favorable outcomes, long-term left ventricular assist devices should be considered as an alternative to transplantation. Finally, designing organ distribution criteria remains a constantly evolving challenge, as there is no universal system that can address all the issues involved. Allocating organs to the most critically ill patients can provide substantial individual benefits, as long as it does not significantly compromise the common good.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":"78 5","pages":"Pages 465-472"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart transplant as treatment for cardiogenic shock: an effective strategy or a “Spanish exception”?\",\"authors\":\"Francisco José Hernández-Pérez ,&nbsp;Alba Martín-Centellas ,&nbsp;Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte ,&nbsp;Cristina Mitroi ,&nbsp;Manuel Gómez-Bueno ,&nbsp;Javier Segovia-Cubero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rec.2024.11.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cardiogenic shock remains one of the main challenges in modern cardiovascular medicine. In Spain, urgent cardiac transplantation is the most widely used heart replacement therapy fin eligible patients who do not achieve cardiac recovery. However, this approach has significant implications related to the principle of equity, influenced by the characteristics of the recipient, the donor, and organ access. When selecting a recipient, multiorgan failure must first be addressed before considering transplantation. At the same time, it is essential to expand the donor pool through various strategies to meet the growing demand, even if it involves using suboptimal organs. Given the scarcity of donors and favorable outcomes, long-term left ventricular assist devices should be considered as an alternative to transplantation. Finally, designing organ distribution criteria remains a constantly evolving challenge, as there is no universal system that can address all the issues involved. Allocating organs to the most critically ill patients can provide substantial individual benefits, as long as it does not significantly compromise the common good.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\"78 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 465-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585725000623\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585725000623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心源性休克仍然是现代心血管医学面临的主要挑战之一。在西班牙,紧急心脏移植是最广泛使用的心脏替代疗法,用于那些没有达到心脏恢复的患者。然而,这种方法受受者、供者和器官获取的特点影响,对公平原则有重大影响。在选择受体时,在考虑移植之前必须首先解决多器官衰竭问题。与此同时,通过各种策略扩大供体库以满足不断增长的需求是至关重要的,即使这涉及到使用次优器官。鉴于供体稀缺和良好的预后,长期左心室辅助装置应被视为移植的替代方案。最后,设计器官分配标准仍然是一个不断发展的挑战,因为没有一个通用的系统可以解决所有涉及的问题。将器官分配给最危重的病人可以提供实质性的个人利益,只要它不会显著损害共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heart transplant as treatment for cardiogenic shock: an effective strategy or a “Spanish exception”?
Cardiogenic shock remains one of the main challenges in modern cardiovascular medicine. In Spain, urgent cardiac transplantation is the most widely used heart replacement therapy fin eligible patients who do not achieve cardiac recovery. However, this approach has significant implications related to the principle of equity, influenced by the characteristics of the recipient, the donor, and organ access. When selecting a recipient, multiorgan failure must first be addressed before considering transplantation. At the same time, it is essential to expand the donor pool through various strategies to meet the growing demand, even if it involves using suboptimal organs. Given the scarcity of donors and favorable outcomes, long-term left ventricular assist devices should be considered as an alternative to transplantation. Finally, designing organ distribution criteria remains a constantly evolving challenge, as there is no universal system that can address all the issues involved. Allocating organs to the most critically ill patients can provide substantial individual benefits, as long as it does not significantly compromise the common good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信