公共卫生保健人员对南非偏远农村地区提供精神卫生保健的机会和准备情况的经验和意见。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI:10.22605/RRH8961
Divan Rall, Leslie Swartz
{"title":"公共卫生保健人员对南非偏远农村地区提供精神卫生保健的机会和准备情况的经验和意见。","authors":"Divan Rall, Leslie Swartz","doi":"10.22605/RRH8961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>WHO encourages decentralising mental health care away from the tertiary locus of care into lower levels of care so as to reform mental healthcare worldwide. Recently, attempts have been made to facilitate the integration of public mental health care into general healthcare systems in South Africa. It is well established that the country's public healthcare system faces numerous multifaceted challenges - including very limited human, structural and material resources needed to accommodate and treat patients. We studied the experiences and opinions of public healthcare workers at primary healthcare clinics and the associated referral hospitals, focusing mainly on exploring their views on the ability and readiness for access to and provision of mental health to state health patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale (MICA-4) and a purpose-made questionnaire were used for data collection. The data from the MAKS and MICA-4 were imported into IBM SPSS Statistics Software to yield descriptive information, and Spearman's rank correlations were performed between the measures. The purpose-made questionnaire produced descriptive quantitative data and qualitative data that were analysed through conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the MAKS suggest that participants experienced gaps in mental health knowledge and had fair levels of familiarity and ability to recognise different mental health conditions. Results from the MICA-4 suggest that participants in our study generally displayed a positive attitude towards people with mental illness and aspects involving psychiatry. Quantitative results from the purpose-made questionnaire describe aspects around mental health services, training, resources and care. Qualitative findings suggest healthcare workers wished for more mental-health-specific resources and contact with the healthcare system to facilitate interventions and care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research presents possible solutions to the challenges faced in public mental health care. Some of these solutions are within workers' control, while many of the solutions to the successful integration of more comprehensive basic care are out of their ambit of control, remaining locked up in policy and implementation rather than in field-level practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"25 1","pages":"8961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public healthcare personnel's experiences and opinions on access and readiness to provide mental health care in a remote rural area in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Divan Rall, Leslie Swartz\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH8961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>WHO encourages decentralising mental health care away from the tertiary locus of care into lower levels of care so as to reform mental healthcare worldwide. Recently, attempts have been made to facilitate the integration of public mental health care into general healthcare systems in South Africa. It is well established that the country's public healthcare system faces numerous multifaceted challenges - including very limited human, structural and material resources needed to accommodate and treat patients. We studied the experiences and opinions of public healthcare workers at primary healthcare clinics and the associated referral hospitals, focusing mainly on exploring their views on the ability and readiness for access to and provision of mental health to state health patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale (MICA-4) and a purpose-made questionnaire were used for data collection. The data from the MAKS and MICA-4 were imported into IBM SPSS Statistics Software to yield descriptive information, and Spearman's rank correlations were performed between the measures. The purpose-made questionnaire produced descriptive quantitative data and qualitative data that were analysed through conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the MAKS suggest that participants experienced gaps in mental health knowledge and had fair levels of familiarity and ability to recognise different mental health conditions. Results from the MICA-4 suggest that participants in our study generally displayed a positive attitude towards people with mental illness and aspects involving psychiatry. Quantitative results from the purpose-made questionnaire describe aspects around mental health services, training, resources and care. Qualitative findings suggest healthcare workers wished for more mental-health-specific resources and contact with the healthcare system to facilitate interventions and care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research presents possible solutions to the challenges faced in public mental health care. Some of these solutions are within workers' control, while many of the solutions to the successful integration of more comprehensive basic care are out of their ambit of control, remaining locked up in policy and implementation rather than in field-level practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"8961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8961\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:世卫组织鼓励将精神卫生保健从三级护理中心下放到较低水平的护理,以改革全世界的精神卫生保健。最近,南非已尝试促进将公共精神保健纳入一般保健系统。众所周知,该国的公共医疗保健系统面临着许多多方面的挑战,包括容纳和治疗患者所需的人力、结构和物质资源非常有限。我们研究了初级卫生保健诊所和相关转诊医院的公共卫生保健工作者的经验和意见,主要是探讨他们对国家卫生患者获得和提供精神卫生服务的能力和准备程度的看法。方法:采用心理健康知识量表(MAKS)、心理疾病:临床医生态度量表(MICA-4)和特制问卷进行资料收集。将来自MAKS和MICA-4的数据导入IBM SPSS统计软件以产生描述性信息,并在测量之间进行Spearman秩相关。有目的的问卷产生描述性定量数据和定性数据,通过常规的内容分析进行分析。结果:MAKS的结果表明,参与者在心理健康知识方面存在差距,并且对不同的心理健康状况有一定的熟悉程度和识别能力。MICA-4的结果表明,我们研究的参与者普遍对精神疾病患者和涉及精神病学的方面表现出积极的态度。有目的的调查问卷的定量结果描述了有关精神卫生服务、培训、资源和护理的各个方面。定性研究结果表明,卫生保健工作者希望获得更多的心理健康专门资源,并与卫生保健系统接触,以促进干预和护理。结论:本研究为公共精神卫生保健面临的挑战提供了可能的解决方案。其中一些解决方案在工人的控制范围内,而许多成功整合更全面的基本保健的解决方案超出了他们的控制范围,仍然被锁定在政策和实施中,而不是在实地实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public healthcare personnel's experiences and opinions on access and readiness to provide mental health care in a remote rural area in South Africa.

Introduction: WHO encourages decentralising mental health care away from the tertiary locus of care into lower levels of care so as to reform mental healthcare worldwide. Recently, attempts have been made to facilitate the integration of public mental health care into general healthcare systems in South Africa. It is well established that the country's public healthcare system faces numerous multifaceted challenges - including very limited human, structural and material resources needed to accommodate and treat patients. We studied the experiences and opinions of public healthcare workers at primary healthcare clinics and the associated referral hospitals, focusing mainly on exploring their views on the ability and readiness for access to and provision of mental health to state health patients.

Methods: The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale (MICA-4) and a purpose-made questionnaire were used for data collection. The data from the MAKS and MICA-4 were imported into IBM SPSS Statistics Software to yield descriptive information, and Spearman's rank correlations were performed between the measures. The purpose-made questionnaire produced descriptive quantitative data and qualitative data that were analysed through conventional content analysis.

Results: Results from the MAKS suggest that participants experienced gaps in mental health knowledge and had fair levels of familiarity and ability to recognise different mental health conditions. Results from the MICA-4 suggest that participants in our study generally displayed a positive attitude towards people with mental illness and aspects involving psychiatry. Quantitative results from the purpose-made questionnaire describe aspects around mental health services, training, resources and care. Qualitative findings suggest healthcare workers wished for more mental-health-specific resources and contact with the healthcare system to facilitate interventions and care.

Conclusion: This research presents possible solutions to the challenges faced in public mental health care. Some of these solutions are within workers' control, while many of the solutions to the successful integration of more comprehensive basic care are out of their ambit of control, remaining locked up in policy and implementation rather than in field-level practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信