通过早期黄斑病变活检,免疫复合物血管炎血管周围免疫球蛋白沉积的检出率很高。

IF 5.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Luisa Herda, Christiane Michl, Cord Sunderkötter
{"title":"通过早期黄斑病变活检,免疫复合物血管炎血管周围免疫球蛋白沉积的检出率很高。","authors":"Luisa Herda, Christiane Michl, Cord Sunderkötter","doi":"10.1111/ddg.15636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In immune complex vasculitis the detection of perivascular immunoglobulins by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) not only helps to confirm the diagnosis, but also to define the type of vasculitis (e.g., IgA-, IgG/IgM-, rheumatoid or cryoglobulinemic vasculitis). The value of DIF, though, has been questioned due to the heterogeneous yield of positive reactions in various studies. One major reason for a negative DIF is a biopsy of older lesions. To ensure selection of fresh lesions, we consistently apply morphological criteria: partially blanchable macules with only a minor petechial and papular component and in proximity to palpable or retiform purpura. This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the detection rate attainable by this procedure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In our department, we identified 56 patients from 2017-2024 with histologically and clinically confirmed immune complex vasculitis from whom a corresponding biopsy had been obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92.9% of these patients showed perivascular deposition of at least one immunoglobulin (mostly IgA (85,7%), with or without IgG or IgM, 7,1% showed no IgA, but IgG or IgM). Biopsies positive only for C3 were considered negative. Of the IgA-positive patients 15% had a systemic, 83% a skin-limited IgA-vasculitis and 2% recurrent macular vasculitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When using defined morphological or clinical criteria for selecting appropriate biopsy sites, DIF demonstrates high sensitivity in identifying the nature of perivascular immunoglobulins in immune complex vasculitis and may serve as a valid criterion in diagnostic algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14758,"journal":{"name":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High detection rate for perivascular deposits of immunoglobulins in immune complex vasculitis from biopsies of early macular lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Herda, Christiane Michl, Cord Sunderkötter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddg.15636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In immune complex vasculitis the detection of perivascular immunoglobulins by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) not only helps to confirm the diagnosis, but also to define the type of vasculitis (e.g., IgA-, IgG/IgM-, rheumatoid or cryoglobulinemic vasculitis). The value of DIF, though, has been questioned due to the heterogeneous yield of positive reactions in various studies. One major reason for a negative DIF is a biopsy of older lesions. To ensure selection of fresh lesions, we consistently apply morphological criteria: partially blanchable macules with only a minor petechial and papular component and in proximity to palpable or retiform purpura. This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the detection rate attainable by this procedure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In our department, we identified 56 patients from 2017-2024 with histologically and clinically confirmed immune complex vasculitis from whom a corresponding biopsy had been obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>92.9% of these patients showed perivascular deposition of at least one immunoglobulin (mostly IgA (85,7%), with or without IgG or IgM, 7,1% showed no IgA, but IgG or IgM). Biopsies positive only for C3 were considered negative. Of the IgA-positive patients 15% had a systemic, 83% a skin-limited IgA-vasculitis and 2% recurrent macular vasculitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When using defined morphological or clinical criteria for selecting appropriate biopsy sites, DIF demonstrates high sensitivity in identifying the nature of perivascular immunoglobulins in immune complex vasculitis and may serve as a valid criterion in diagnostic algorithms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15636\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High detection rate for perivascular deposits of immunoglobulins in immune complex vasculitis from biopsies of early macular lesions.

Background: In immune complex vasculitis the detection of perivascular immunoglobulins by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) not only helps to confirm the diagnosis, but also to define the type of vasculitis (e.g., IgA-, IgG/IgM-, rheumatoid or cryoglobulinemic vasculitis). The value of DIF, though, has been questioned due to the heterogeneous yield of positive reactions in various studies. One major reason for a negative DIF is a biopsy of older lesions. To ensure selection of fresh lesions, we consistently apply morphological criteria: partially blanchable macules with only a minor petechial and papular component and in proximity to palpable or retiform purpura. This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the detection rate attainable by this procedure.

Patients and methods: In our department, we identified 56 patients from 2017-2024 with histologically and clinically confirmed immune complex vasculitis from whom a corresponding biopsy had been obtained.

Results: 92.9% of these patients showed perivascular deposition of at least one immunoglobulin (mostly IgA (85,7%), with or without IgG or IgM, 7,1% showed no IgA, but IgG or IgM). Biopsies positive only for C3 were considered negative. Of the IgA-positive patients 15% had a systemic, 83% a skin-limited IgA-vasculitis and 2% recurrent macular vasculitis.

Conclusions: When using defined morphological or clinical criteria for selecting appropriate biopsy sites, DIF demonstrates high sensitivity in identifying the nature of perivascular immunoglobulins in immune complex vasculitis and may serve as a valid criterion in diagnostic algorithms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The JDDG publishes scientific papers from a wide range of disciplines, such as dermatovenereology, allergology, phlebology, dermatosurgery, dermatooncology, and dermatohistopathology. Also in JDDG: information on medical training, continuing education, a calendar of events, book reviews and society announcements. Papers can be submitted in German or English language. In the print version, all articles are published in German. In the online version, all key articles are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信