iv期非小细胞肺癌患者与靶向治疗相关的非皮疹皮肤毒性的概况及临床预测效果

IF 5.7 4区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Bioscience trends Pub Date : 2025-05-09 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.5582/bst.2024.01424
Yanmei Peng, Collin M Costello, Zhaoheng Liu, Ashok V Kumar, Zhong Gu, Nikhila Kosuru, Jason A Wampfler, Pedro A Reck Dos Santos, Jonathan D'Cunha, Vinicius Ernani, Ping Yang
{"title":"iv期非小细胞肺癌患者与靶向治疗相关的非皮疹皮肤毒性的概况及临床预测效果","authors":"Yanmei Peng, Collin M Costello, Zhaoheng Liu, Ashok V Kumar, Zhong Gu, Nikhila Kosuru, Jason A Wampfler, Pedro A Reck Dos Santos, Jonathan D'Cunha, Vinicius Ernani, Ping Yang","doi":"10.5582/bst.2024.01424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dermatologic toxicities associated with targeted therapies may impact drug intolerance and predict drug response, among which rash is most frequently reported and well delineated. However, the profile and effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity are not fully understood. We identified stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in 2006-2019 and systematically analyzed demographics, targeted agents, toxicity, response, and survival outcomes of patients who received targeted therapy. Five toxicity subgroups-none, only non-rash dermatologic, concurrent non-rash and rash (concurrent) dermatologic, only rash, and others-were compared; multivariable survival analyses employed Cox Proportional Hazard models. This study included 533 patients who had taken targeted therapies: 36 (6.8%) had no toxicity, 26 (4.9%) only non-rash dermatologic, 193 (36.2%) only rash, 134 (25.1%) concurrent dermatologic, 144 (27.0%) other toxicities. Non-rash dermatologic toxicities predominately included xerosis (12.8%), pruritus (8.5%), paronychia (7.0%). Rash was the most frequent (59.4%) and the earliest occurring (21 median onset days [MOD]) dermatologic toxicity; paronychia was the latest (69 MOD) occurring. In 329 epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-treated patients with dermatologic toxicity, mild toxicity occurred the most frequently in patients with only non-rash (81.8%), then those with only rash (64.8%), and the least in the concurrent (50.4%, P=0.013). Patients with concurrent dermatologic toxicities had a significantly higher response rate (67.9%) than those with only non-rash (53.8%) or only rash (41.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated concurrent dermatologic toxicity independently predicted a lower risk of death (harzard ratio [HR] 0.48 [0.30-0.77], p < 0.001). Compared to rash, non-rash dermatologic toxicity might be a stronger predictor of better treatment response and longer survival in patients who received targeted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8957,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience trends","volume":" ","pages":"221-231"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The profile and clinical predicting effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity related to targeted therapy in stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Yanmei Peng, Collin M Costello, Zhaoheng Liu, Ashok V Kumar, Zhong Gu, Nikhila Kosuru, Jason A Wampfler, Pedro A Reck Dos Santos, Jonathan D'Cunha, Vinicius Ernani, Ping Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.5582/bst.2024.01424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dermatologic toxicities associated with targeted therapies may impact drug intolerance and predict drug response, among which rash is most frequently reported and well delineated. However, the profile and effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity are not fully understood. We identified stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in 2006-2019 and systematically analyzed demographics, targeted agents, toxicity, response, and survival outcomes of patients who received targeted therapy. Five toxicity subgroups-none, only non-rash dermatologic, concurrent non-rash and rash (concurrent) dermatologic, only rash, and others-were compared; multivariable survival analyses employed Cox Proportional Hazard models. This study included 533 patients who had taken targeted therapies: 36 (6.8%) had no toxicity, 26 (4.9%) only non-rash dermatologic, 193 (36.2%) only rash, 134 (25.1%) concurrent dermatologic, 144 (27.0%) other toxicities. Non-rash dermatologic toxicities predominately included xerosis (12.8%), pruritus (8.5%), paronychia (7.0%). Rash was the most frequent (59.4%) and the earliest occurring (21 median onset days [MOD]) dermatologic toxicity; paronychia was the latest (69 MOD) occurring. In 329 epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-treated patients with dermatologic toxicity, mild toxicity occurred the most frequently in patients with only non-rash (81.8%), then those with only rash (64.8%), and the least in the concurrent (50.4%, P=0.013). Patients with concurrent dermatologic toxicities had a significantly higher response rate (67.9%) than those with only non-rash (53.8%) or only rash (41.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated concurrent dermatologic toxicity independently predicted a lower risk of death (harzard ratio [HR] 0.48 [0.30-0.77], p < 0.001). Compared to rash, non-rash dermatologic toxicity might be a stronger predictor of better treatment response and longer survival in patients who received targeted therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"221-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01424\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience trends","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与靶向治疗相关的皮肤毒性可能影响药物不耐受并预测药物反应,其中皮疹是最常被报道和描述清楚的。然而,非皮疹皮肤毒性的概况和效果尚未完全了解。我们确定了2006-2019年在梅奥诊所诊断的iv期非小细胞肺癌患者,并系统地分析了接受靶向治疗的患者的人口统计学、靶向药物、毒性、反应和生存结果。比较了5个毒性亚组——无毒性、只有非皮疹性皮肤病、并发无皮疹和皮疹(并发)皮肤病、只有皮疹和其他;多变量生存分析采用Cox比例风险模型。本研究纳入533例接受靶向治疗的患者:36例(6.8%)无毒性,26例(4.9%)仅无皮疹,193例(36.2%)仅皮疹,134例(25.1%)并发皮肤病,144例(27.0%)其他毒性。非皮疹性皮肤毒性主要包括干燥症(12.8%)、瘙痒症(8.5%)、甲沟炎(7.0%)。皮疹是最常见的(59.4%)和最早发生的(21中位发病日[MOD])皮肤毒性;甲沟炎是最近发生的(69 MOD)。在329例表皮生长因子受体抑制剂治疗的皮肤毒性患者中,轻度毒性在仅无皮疹的患者中发生率最高(81.8%),其次是仅皮疹的患者(64.8%),同时出现轻度毒性的患者发生率最低(50.4%,P=0.013)。伴有皮肤毒性的患者的有效率(67.9%)明显高于无皮疹(53.8%)或仅皮疹(41.1%,p < 0.001)。多变量分析表明,并发皮肤毒性独立预测较低的死亡风险(风险比[HR] 0.48 [0.30-0.77], p < 0.001)。与皮疹相比,非皮疹皮肤毒性可能是接受靶向治疗的患者更好的治疗反应和更长的生存期的一个更强的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The profile and clinical predicting effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity related to targeted therapy in stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Dermatologic toxicities associated with targeted therapies may impact drug intolerance and predict drug response, among which rash is most frequently reported and well delineated. However, the profile and effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity are not fully understood. We identified stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in 2006-2019 and systematically analyzed demographics, targeted agents, toxicity, response, and survival outcomes of patients who received targeted therapy. Five toxicity subgroups-none, only non-rash dermatologic, concurrent non-rash and rash (concurrent) dermatologic, only rash, and others-were compared; multivariable survival analyses employed Cox Proportional Hazard models. This study included 533 patients who had taken targeted therapies: 36 (6.8%) had no toxicity, 26 (4.9%) only non-rash dermatologic, 193 (36.2%) only rash, 134 (25.1%) concurrent dermatologic, 144 (27.0%) other toxicities. Non-rash dermatologic toxicities predominately included xerosis (12.8%), pruritus (8.5%), paronychia (7.0%). Rash was the most frequent (59.4%) and the earliest occurring (21 median onset days [MOD]) dermatologic toxicity; paronychia was the latest (69 MOD) occurring. In 329 epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-treated patients with dermatologic toxicity, mild toxicity occurred the most frequently in patients with only non-rash (81.8%), then those with only rash (64.8%), and the least in the concurrent (50.4%, P=0.013). Patients with concurrent dermatologic toxicities had a significantly higher response rate (67.9%) than those with only non-rash (53.8%) or only rash (41.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated concurrent dermatologic toxicity independently predicted a lower risk of death (harzard ratio [HR] 0.48 [0.30-0.77], p < 0.001). Compared to rash, non-rash dermatologic toxicity might be a stronger predictor of better treatment response and longer survival in patients who received targeted therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BioScience Trends (Print ISSN 1881-7815, Online ISSN 1881-7823) is an international peer-reviewed journal. BioScience Trends devotes to publishing the latest and most exciting advances in scientific research. Articles cover fields of life science such as biochemistry, molecular biology, clinical research, public health, medical care system, and social science in order to encourage cooperation and exchange among scientists and clinical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信