{"title":"Handling Distinct Correlated Effects with CCE","authors":"Ovidijus Stauskas, Ignace De Vos","doi":"10.1111/obes.12650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The common correlated effects (CCE) approach by Pesaran is a popular method for estimating panel data models with interactive effects. Due to its simplicity, i.e., unobserved common factors are approximated with cross-section averages of the observables, the estimator is highly flexible and lends itself to a wide range of applications. Despite such flexibility, however, the properties of CCE estimators are typically only examined under the restrictive assumption that all the observed variables load on the same set of factors, which ensures joint identification of the factor space. In this article, we take a different perspective, and explore the empirically relevant case where the dependent and explanatory variables are driven by distinct but correlated factors. Hence, we consider the case of <i>Distinct Correlated Effects</i>. Such settings can be argued to be relevant for practice, for instance in studies linking economic growth to climatic variables. In so doing, we consider panel dimensions such that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mi>N</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <mo>→</mo>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n <mo><</mo>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ T{N}^{-1}\\to \\tau <\\infty $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> as <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n <mo>→</mo>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\left(N,T\\right)\\to \\infty $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, which is known to induce an asymptotic bias for the pooled CCE estimator even under the usual common factor assumption. We subsequently develop a robust bootstrap-based toolbox that enables asymptotically valid inference in both homogeneous and heterogeneous panels, without requiring knowledge about whether factors are distinct or common.</p>","PeriodicalId":54654,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","volume":"87 2","pages":"448-475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obes.12650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Pesaran 提出的共同相关效应(CCE)方法是估计具有交互效应的面板数据模型的常用方法。由于其简单性(即用观测变量的横截面平均值近似表示未观测到的共同因素),该估计方法非常灵活,应用范围广泛。然而,尽管有这样的灵活性,CCE 估计器的特性通常只在所有观测变量都加载在同一组因子上这一限制性假设下进行检验,这就确保了因子空间的联合识别。在本文中,我们将从另一个角度出发,探讨因变量和解释变量由不同但相关的因子驱动的经验相关情况。因此,我们考虑的是不同相关效应的情况。这种情况可以说与实践相关,例如在将经济增长与气候变量联系起来的研究中。在此过程中,我们考虑了面板维度,即 T N - 1 → τ < ∞ $$ T{N}^{-1}\to \tau <\infty $$,因为 ( N , T ) → ∞ $$ \left(N,T\right)\to \infty $$,众所周知,即使在通常的共同因素假设下,这也会引起集合 CCE 估计器的渐进偏差。我们随后开发了一个基于自举法的稳健工具箱,可以在同质和异质面板中进行渐进有效的推断,而不需要知道因子是不同的还是共同的。
The common correlated effects (CCE) approach by Pesaran is a popular method for estimating panel data models with interactive effects. Due to its simplicity, i.e., unobserved common factors are approximated with cross-section averages of the observables, the estimator is highly flexible and lends itself to a wide range of applications. Despite such flexibility, however, the properties of CCE estimators are typically only examined under the restrictive assumption that all the observed variables load on the same set of factors, which ensures joint identification of the factor space. In this article, we take a different perspective, and explore the empirically relevant case where the dependent and explanatory variables are driven by distinct but correlated factors. Hence, we consider the case of Distinct Correlated Effects. Such settings can be argued to be relevant for practice, for instance in studies linking economic growth to climatic variables. In so doing, we consider panel dimensions such that as , which is known to induce an asymptotic bias for the pooled CCE estimator even under the usual common factor assumption. We subsequently develop a robust bootstrap-based toolbox that enables asymptotically valid inference in both homogeneous and heterogeneous panels, without requiring knowledge about whether factors are distinct or common.
期刊介绍:
Whilst the Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics publishes papers in all areas of applied economics, emphasis is placed on the practical importance, theoretical interest and policy-relevance of their substantive results, as well as on the methodology and technical competence of the research.
Contributions on the topical issues of economic policy and the testing of currently controversial economic theories are encouraged, as well as more empirical research on both developed and developing countries.