非发育不良口腔白斑的手术切除及随访。系统回顾

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Haruki Sato , Hideki Nakayama , Takahiro Yagyuu , Masanobu Abe , Taiki Suzuki , Daisuke Takeda , Masatoshi Adachi , Hidemichi Yuasa , Narikazu Uzawa , Hiroshi Kurita
{"title":"非发育不良口腔白斑的手术切除及随访。系统回顾","authors":"Haruki Sato ,&nbsp;Hideki Nakayama ,&nbsp;Takahiro Yagyuu ,&nbsp;Masanobu Abe ,&nbsp;Taiki Suzuki ,&nbsp;Daisuke Takeda ,&nbsp;Masatoshi Adachi ,&nbsp;Hidemichi Yuasa ,&nbsp;Narikazu Uzawa ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kurita","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In this systematic review, we aimed to clarify the clinical question, “Should nondysplastic oral leukoplakia be surgically excised?”, in accordance with the Japanese Oral Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina Web, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify articles that met the pre-established criteria. We performed a statistical analysis using RevMan Web and assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 784 articles were identified, and one randomized controlled trial including 235 participants was selected. The only primary outcome that could be assessed was rate of malignant transformation, with a risk ratio of 1.14 and a 95 % confidence interval of 0.07–17.95. Meta-analysis was not performed because only one randomized controlled trial was available. The time to onset of malignant transformation, rate of recurrence, rate of clinical resolution, and rate of clinical deterioration were not analyzed due to the lack of data. The certainty of the evidence was very low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We could not determine the superiority of surgical excision over follow-up in patients with non-dysplastic oral leukoplakia. Future multicenter data collection, utilizing standardized and objective measures, is essential to better define the indications for surgical excision in patients with non-dysplastic oral leukoplakia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","volume":"37 3","pages":"Pages 414-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical excision and follow-up of nondysplastic oral leukoplakia. A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Haruki Sato ,&nbsp;Hideki Nakayama ,&nbsp;Takahiro Yagyuu ,&nbsp;Masanobu Abe ,&nbsp;Taiki Suzuki ,&nbsp;Daisuke Takeda ,&nbsp;Masatoshi Adachi ,&nbsp;Hidemichi Yuasa ,&nbsp;Narikazu Uzawa ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kurita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.11.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In this systematic review, we aimed to clarify the clinical question, “Should nondysplastic oral leukoplakia be surgically excised?”, in accordance with the Japanese Oral Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina Web, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify articles that met the pre-established criteria. We performed a statistical analysis using RevMan Web and assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 784 articles were identified, and one randomized controlled trial including 235 participants was selected. The only primary outcome that could be assessed was rate of malignant transformation, with a risk ratio of 1.14 and a 95 % confidence interval of 0.07–17.95. Meta-analysis was not performed because only one randomized controlled trial was available. The time to onset of malignant transformation, rate of recurrence, rate of clinical resolution, and rate of clinical deterioration were not analyzed due to the lack of data. The certainty of the evidence was very low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We could not determine the superiority of surgical excision over follow-up in patients with non-dysplastic oral leukoplakia. Future multicenter data collection, utilizing standardized and objective measures, is essential to better define the indications for surgical excision in patients with non-dysplastic oral leukoplakia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 414-419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824002412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824002412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇系统综述中,我们旨在澄清临床问题,“非发育不良的口腔白斑应该手术切除吗?”,按照日本口腔癌临床实践指南。方法我们检索MEDLINE、日本中央医学网和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,以确定符合预先设定标准的文章。我们使用RevMan Web进行统计分析,并使用分级推荐评估、发展和评估方法评估证据的确定性。结果共纳入文献784篇,随机对照试验1项,纳入受试者235人。唯一可以评估的主要结局是恶性转化率,其风险比为1.14,95%可信区间为0.07-17.95。由于只有一项随机对照试验可用,因此未进行meta分析。由于缺乏资料,我们没有分析恶性转化的发生时间、复发率、临床缓解率和临床恶化率。证据的确定性很低。结论对于非发育不良口腔白斑患者,手术切除优于随访尚不能确定。未来的多中心数据收集,采用标准化和客观的措施,对于更好地确定非发育不良口腔白斑患者的手术切除指征至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical excision and follow-up of nondysplastic oral leukoplakia. A systematic review

Objectives

In this systematic review, we aimed to clarify the clinical question, “Should nondysplastic oral leukoplakia be surgically excised?”, in accordance with the Japanese Oral Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina Web, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify articles that met the pre-established criteria. We performed a statistical analysis using RevMan Web and assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Results

In total, 784 articles were identified, and one randomized controlled trial including 235 participants was selected. The only primary outcome that could be assessed was rate of malignant transformation, with a risk ratio of 1.14 and a 95 % confidence interval of 0.07–17.95. Meta-analysis was not performed because only one randomized controlled trial was available. The time to onset of malignant transformation, rate of recurrence, rate of clinical resolution, and rate of clinical deterioration were not analyzed due to the lack of data. The certainty of the evidence was very low.

Conclusions

We could not determine the superiority of surgical excision over follow-up in patients with non-dysplastic oral leukoplakia. Future multicenter data collection, utilizing standardized and objective measures, is essential to better define the indications for surgical excision in patients with non-dysplastic oral leukoplakia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信