Malcolm Crack, Craig J. Rodger, Mark A. Clilverd, Aaron T. Hendry, Jean-Andre Sauvaud
{"title":"辐射带的高能电子降水:地磁和太阳风降水通量量级的代用物","authors":"Malcolm Crack, Craig J. Rodger, Mark A. Clilverd, Aaron T. Hendry, Jean-Andre Sauvaud","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previously the geomagnetic Ap index has been used as a proxy to produce empirical energetic electron precipitation (EEP) forcing representations suitable for incorporation into coupled-climate model runs. The long-running Ap index has the advantage that it allows descriptions of EEP to be made for periods outside the current satellite era, but its suitability has not been checked against other reasonable proxies. In this study three different satellite electron precipitation data sets (DEMETER, POES, and SAMPEX) are used to examine the suitability of a variety of geomagnetic and solar wind proxies to represent EEP flux in different energy ranges. Analysis was undertaken using indices at their fundamental timescales (typically minutes or hours). For medium energy electron precipitation (i.e., >100 keV), the best proxy is found to be either Ap or Dst. For relativistic energy electron precipitation (i.e., >700 keV), the best proxy is Kp or AE, the latter suggesting a connection to substorm activity. The identification of the Ap index as one of the best proxies for medium energy EEP supports the approach taken by van de Kamp et al. (2016), https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024212. An EEP forcing capability based on Ap was developed by those authors for inclusion as a solar forcing factor in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 of the World Climate Research Program.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energetic Electron Precipitation From the Radiation Belts: Geomagnetic and Solar Wind Proxies for Precipitation Flux Magnitudes\",\"authors\":\"Malcolm Crack, Craig J. Rodger, Mark A. Clilverd, Aaron T. Hendry, Jean-Andre Sauvaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JA033158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previously the geomagnetic Ap index has been used as a proxy to produce empirical energetic electron precipitation (EEP) forcing representations suitable for incorporation into coupled-climate model runs. The long-running Ap index has the advantage that it allows descriptions of EEP to be made for periods outside the current satellite era, but its suitability has not been checked against other reasonable proxies. In this study three different satellite electron precipitation data sets (DEMETER, POES, and SAMPEX) are used to examine the suitability of a variety of geomagnetic and solar wind proxies to represent EEP flux in different energy ranges. Analysis was undertaken using indices at their fundamental timescales (typically minutes or hours). For medium energy electron precipitation (i.e., >100 keV), the best proxy is found to be either Ap or Dst. For relativistic energy electron precipitation (i.e., >700 keV), the best proxy is Kp or AE, the latter suggesting a connection to substorm activity. The identification of the Ap index as one of the best proxies for medium energy EEP supports the approach taken by van de Kamp et al. (2016), https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024212. An EEP forcing capability based on Ap was developed by those authors for inclusion as a solar forcing factor in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 of the World Climate Research Program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":\"130 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033158\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033158\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以前,地磁Ap指数已被用作产生经验高能电子降水(EEP)强迫表示的代理,适合纳入耦合气候模式运行。长期运行的Ap指数的优势在于,它允许对当前卫星时代以外的时期进行EEP描述,但其适用性尚未与其他合理的代理进行对照。本研究利用三种不同的卫星电子降水数据集(DEMETER、POES和SAMPEX),检验了各种地磁和太阳风代用品在不同能量范围内代表EEP通量的适用性。使用基本时间尺度(通常为分钟或小时)的指数进行分析。对于中能电子沉淀(即>;100 keV), Ap或Dst是最好的替代物。对于相对论能量电子沉淀(即>;700 keV),最好的代表是Kp或AE,后者表明与亚暴活动有关。将Ap指数确定为中能量EEP的最佳代理之一,支持van de Kamp等人(2016),https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024212所采用的方法。这些作者开发了基于Ap的EEP强迫能力,将其作为太阳强迫因子纳入世界气候研究计划的耦合模式比较项目第6阶段。
Energetic Electron Precipitation From the Radiation Belts: Geomagnetic and Solar Wind Proxies for Precipitation Flux Magnitudes
Previously the geomagnetic Ap index has been used as a proxy to produce empirical energetic electron precipitation (EEP) forcing representations suitable for incorporation into coupled-climate model runs. The long-running Ap index has the advantage that it allows descriptions of EEP to be made for periods outside the current satellite era, but its suitability has not been checked against other reasonable proxies. In this study three different satellite electron precipitation data sets (DEMETER, POES, and SAMPEX) are used to examine the suitability of a variety of geomagnetic and solar wind proxies to represent EEP flux in different energy ranges. Analysis was undertaken using indices at their fundamental timescales (typically minutes or hours). For medium energy electron precipitation (i.e., >100 keV), the best proxy is found to be either Ap or Dst. For relativistic energy electron precipitation (i.e., >700 keV), the best proxy is Kp or AE, the latter suggesting a connection to substorm activity. The identification of the Ap index as one of the best proxies for medium energy EEP supports the approach taken by van de Kamp et al. (2016), https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024212. An EEP forcing capability based on Ap was developed by those authors for inclusion as a solar forcing factor in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 of the World Climate Research Program.