目击者记忆的认知科学。

IF 16.7 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Laura Mickes, Brent M Wilson, John T Wixted
{"title":"目击者记忆的认知科学。","authors":"Laura Mickes, Brent M Wilson, John T Wixted","doi":"10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent insights from cognitive science have reshaped our understanding of the reliability of eyewitness memory. Many believe that eyewitness memory is unreliable, but a better way of thinking is that eyewitness memory, like other types of forensic evidence, can be contaminated. Because contaminated evidence yields unreliable results, the focus should be placed on testing uncontaminated memory evidence collected early in a police investigation. The recent application of theories, principles, and methods from cognitive science has revealed that, both in the laboratory and in the real world, the first test of uncontaminated memory provides much more reliable information than was previously thought. Moreover, and crucially, this reliable but often-ignored evidence frequently points in the direction of a convicted defendant's innocence.</p>","PeriodicalId":49417,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cognitive science of eyewitness memory.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Mickes, Brent M Wilson, John T Wixted\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent insights from cognitive science have reshaped our understanding of the reliability of eyewitness memory. Many believe that eyewitness memory is unreliable, but a better way of thinking is that eyewitness memory, like other types of forensic evidence, can be contaminated. Because contaminated evidence yields unreliable results, the focus should be placed on testing uncontaminated memory evidence collected early in a police investigation. The recent application of theories, principles, and methods from cognitive science has revealed that, both in the laboratory and in the real world, the first test of uncontaminated memory provides much more reliable information than was previously thought. Moreover, and crucially, this reliable but often-ignored evidence frequently points in the direction of a convicted defendant's innocence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Cognitive Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Cognitive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知科学的最新见解重塑了我们对目击者记忆可靠性的理解。许多人认为目击者的记忆是不可靠的,但更好的思考方式是,目击者的记忆,就像其他类型的法医证据一样,可以被污染。由于被污染的证据会导致不可靠的结果,因此应该把重点放在检验警方在调查初期收集的未被污染的记忆证据上。最近对认知科学的理论、原理和方法的应用表明,无论是在实验室还是在现实世界中,对未受污染的记忆的首次测试提供的信息比以前认为的要可靠得多。此外,至关重要的是,这些可靠但经常被忽视的证据经常指向被定罪的被告无罪的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The cognitive science of eyewitness memory.

Recent insights from cognitive science have reshaped our understanding of the reliability of eyewitness memory. Many believe that eyewitness memory is unreliable, but a better way of thinking is that eyewitness memory, like other types of forensic evidence, can be contaminated. Because contaminated evidence yields unreliable results, the focus should be placed on testing uncontaminated memory evidence collected early in a police investigation. The recent application of theories, principles, and methods from cognitive science has revealed that, both in the laboratory and in the real world, the first test of uncontaminated memory provides much more reliable information than was previously thought. Moreover, and crucially, this reliable but often-ignored evidence frequently points in the direction of a convicted defendant's innocence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
27.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Essential reading for those working directly in the cognitive sciences or in related specialist areas, Trends in Cognitive Sciences provides an instant overview of current thinking for scientists, students and teachers who want to keep up with the latest developments in the cognitive sciences. The journal brings together research in psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, philosophy, computer science and neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences provides a platform for the interaction of these disciplines and the evolution of cognitive science as an independent field of study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信