取消计划营运对轮候时间有何影响?2017/18年英国冬季流感推迟政策的案例研究

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Maria Ana Matias, Rita Santos, Nils Gutacker, Anne Mason, Nigel Rice
{"title":"取消计划营运对轮候时间有何影响?2017/18年英国冬季流感推迟政策的案例研究","authors":"Maria Ana Matias, Rita Santos, Nils Gutacker, Anne Mason, Nigel Rice","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00603-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancelled operations can potentially impact both health and patient experience through their effect on waiting times. However, identifying causal relationships is challenging. One possible solution is to consider 'exogenous shocks' to the system as a type of natural experiment to quantify impacts. In this study, we investigate the 2017/18 national cancellation policy in the English National Health Service (NHS), introduced to alleviate winter pressures due to influenza related admissions. Our aim is to see whether this policy can be used to isolate the impact of changes in the supply of care on waiting times and so inform system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the impact of cancellations on hospital activity and waiting times, we use aggregate quarterly hospital-level data on planned admissions and last-minute planned operations (2013/14 to 2019/20); and individual-level data on waiting times for planned care (2015/16 to 2018/19). We analyse trends in volume of activity and waiting times, and examine waiting times distributions for patients who were admitted for planned surgery from the waiting list before and after the 2017/18 cancellation policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final quarter of 2017/18 had the highest number of cancelled planned operations since 2013/14 and the lowest number of planned admissions since 2015/16. However, the trend in mean and median waiting times was similar across the study period. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy had no identifiable impact on waiting times trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high numbers of cancelled planned operations in 2017/18, we could not identify an impact on waiting times. A plausible explanation is that hospital managers routinely anticipate winter pressures and reduce planned activity to manage bed occupancy. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy merely reinforced existing local decisions. The lack of a suitable counterfactual from which to infer what would have happened in 2017/18 in the absence of a postponement policy makes it impossible to isolate the impact on waiting times. This means that previous NHS cancellation policies are of limited use for informing system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What can we learn about the impact of cancelled planned operations on waiting times? A case study using the 2017/18 winter flu postponement policy in England.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Ana Matias, Rita Santos, Nils Gutacker, Anne Mason, Nigel Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00603-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancelled operations can potentially impact both health and patient experience through their effect on waiting times. However, identifying causal relationships is challenging. One possible solution is to consider 'exogenous shocks' to the system as a type of natural experiment to quantify impacts. In this study, we investigate the 2017/18 national cancellation policy in the English National Health Service (NHS), introduced to alleviate winter pressures due to influenza related admissions. Our aim is to see whether this policy can be used to isolate the impact of changes in the supply of care on waiting times and so inform system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the impact of cancellations on hospital activity and waiting times, we use aggregate quarterly hospital-level data on planned admissions and last-minute planned operations (2013/14 to 2019/20); and individual-level data on waiting times for planned care (2015/16 to 2018/19). We analyse trends in volume of activity and waiting times, and examine waiting times distributions for patients who were admitted for planned surgery from the waiting list before and after the 2017/18 cancellation policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final quarter of 2017/18 had the highest number of cancelled planned operations since 2013/14 and the lowest number of planned admissions since 2015/16. However, the trend in mean and median waiting times was similar across the study period. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy had no identifiable impact on waiting times trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high numbers of cancelled planned operations in 2017/18, we could not identify an impact on waiting times. A plausible explanation is that hospital managers routinely anticipate winter pressures and reduce planned activity to manage bed occupancy. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy merely reinforced existing local decisions. The lack of a suitable counterfactual from which to infer what would have happened in 2017/18 in the absence of a postponement policy makes it impossible to isolate the impact on waiting times. This means that previous NHS cancellation policies are of limited use for informing system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00603-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00603-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:取消手术可能通过对等待时间的影响影响健康和患者体验。然而,确定因果关系是具有挑战性的。一种可能的解决方案是将对系统的“外生冲击”视为一种量化影响的自然实验。在本研究中,我们调查了2017/18年英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的国家取消政策,该政策的引入是为了缓解冬季因流感相关入院造成的压力。我们的目标是看看这项政策是否可以用来隔离医疗供应变化对等待时间的影响,从而为系统从冠状病毒大流行等重大外生冲击中恢复提供信息。方法:为了评估取消预约对医院活动和等待时间的影响,我们使用了2013/14至2019/20年院级计划入院和最后计划手术的季度汇总数据;以及2015/16至2018/19年度计划护理等待时间的个人层面数据。我们分析了活动量和等待时间的趋势,并检查了2017/18取消政策前后等候名单中因计划手术而入院的患者的等待时间分布。结果:2017/18的最后一个季度是自2013/14以来取消计划手术数量最多的季度,是自2015/16以来计划入院人数最少的季度。然而,在整个研究期间,平均和中位数等待时间的趋势是相似的。因此,2017/18年度国家延期政策对等待时间趋势没有明显影响。结论:尽管2017/18年度取消了大量计划运营,但我们无法确定对等待时间的影响。一个合理的解释是,医院管理者通常会预测到冬季的压力,并减少计划的活动来管理床位占用。因此,2017/18年度的国家延期政策只是强化了现有的地方决定。由于缺乏合适的反事实来推断在没有延期政策的情况下2017/18年会发生什么,因此不可能将对等待时间的影响隔离开来。这意味着以前的NHS取消政策对于通知系统从重大外部冲击(如冠状病毒大流行)中恢复的作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What can we learn about the impact of cancelled planned operations on waiting times? A case study using the 2017/18 winter flu postponement policy in England.

Background: Cancelled operations can potentially impact both health and patient experience through their effect on waiting times. However, identifying causal relationships is challenging. One possible solution is to consider 'exogenous shocks' to the system as a type of natural experiment to quantify impacts. In this study, we investigate the 2017/18 national cancellation policy in the English National Health Service (NHS), introduced to alleviate winter pressures due to influenza related admissions. Our aim is to see whether this policy can be used to isolate the impact of changes in the supply of care on waiting times and so inform system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic.

Methods: To assess the impact of cancellations on hospital activity and waiting times, we use aggregate quarterly hospital-level data on planned admissions and last-minute planned operations (2013/14 to 2019/20); and individual-level data on waiting times for planned care (2015/16 to 2018/19). We analyse trends in volume of activity and waiting times, and examine waiting times distributions for patients who were admitted for planned surgery from the waiting list before and after the 2017/18 cancellation policy.

Results: The final quarter of 2017/18 had the highest number of cancelled planned operations since 2013/14 and the lowest number of planned admissions since 2015/16. However, the trend in mean and median waiting times was similar across the study period. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy had no identifiable impact on waiting times trends.

Conclusions: Despite the high numbers of cancelled planned operations in 2017/18, we could not identify an impact on waiting times. A plausible explanation is that hospital managers routinely anticipate winter pressures and reduce planned activity to manage bed occupancy. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy merely reinforced existing local decisions. The lack of a suitable counterfactual from which to infer what would have happened in 2017/18 in the absence of a postponement policy makes it impossible to isolate the impact on waiting times. This means that previous NHS cancellation policies are of limited use for informing system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信