骨科和腹部手术后舌下含服舒芬太尼:长期疗效和安全性。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Michael Borck, Jan D Wandrey, Claudia Spies, Sascha Tafelski
{"title":"骨科和腹部手术后舌下含服舒芬太尼:长期疗效和安全性。","authors":"Michael Borck, Jan D Wandrey, Claudia Spies, Sascha Tafelski","doi":"10.1186/s13741-025-00506-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative pain management often requires opioid treatment with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Non-invasive PCA with a sublingual sufentanil tablet system (SSTS) may reduce acute pain sufficiently, but opioids are associated with central nerve system side effects and risk of long-term opioid use postoperatively. The objective of this study was to observe the SSTS to assess the incidence of postoperative chronic pain (PCP) and postoperative delirium (POD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a longitudinal cohort study based at a university hospital between November 2017 and November 2021. Adults undergoing elective orthopaedic knee or abdominal surgery planned for PCA as postoperative pain management were included. They received the SSTS in addition to a standardised pain medication protocol depending on the surgery they underwent. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, emergency surgery, concurrent participation in another clinical trial and chronic opioid use before surgery. Patients were followed after surgery in hospital and over 3 and 12 months for pain, cognitive function and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether N = 80 patients were included with SSTS postoperatively. Daily pain experience decreased from pre-operatively 89.2% of patients to 45.7% and 22.5% at 3 and 12 months. None of our patients developed postoperative delirium after surgery. Patients reported high overall satisfaction with SSTS (median 8.0/10 points, IQR 3). However, 51% of patients had difficulties with handling the SSTS and required acute replacement of the authentication tag.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSTS sufficiently treated acute postoperative pain without incidence of POD and demonstrated good tolerability and overall ease. Postoperative pain improved significantly over time but 22% still reported chronic pain related to surgery. Technical issues with the identification thumb tag limited the feasibility of SSTS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This prospective longitudinal cohort study was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Ethics committee 2, Campus Charité Virchow Klinikum, EA2/041/17, Prof. Dr. jur. R. Seeland, 21.03.2017) and was registered in the study register ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133858 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublingual sufentanil after orthopaedic and abdominal surgery: long-term outcome and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Borck, Jan D Wandrey, Claudia Spies, Sascha Tafelski\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13741-025-00506-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative pain management often requires opioid treatment with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Non-invasive PCA with a sublingual sufentanil tablet system (SSTS) may reduce acute pain sufficiently, but opioids are associated with central nerve system side effects and risk of long-term opioid use postoperatively. The objective of this study was to observe the SSTS to assess the incidence of postoperative chronic pain (PCP) and postoperative delirium (POD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a longitudinal cohort study based at a university hospital between November 2017 and November 2021. Adults undergoing elective orthopaedic knee or abdominal surgery planned for PCA as postoperative pain management were included. They received the SSTS in addition to a standardised pain medication protocol depending on the surgery they underwent. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, emergency surgery, concurrent participation in another clinical trial and chronic opioid use before surgery. Patients were followed after surgery in hospital and over 3 and 12 months for pain, cognitive function and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether N = 80 patients were included with SSTS postoperatively. Daily pain experience decreased from pre-operatively 89.2% of patients to 45.7% and 22.5% at 3 and 12 months. None of our patients developed postoperative delirium after surgery. Patients reported high overall satisfaction with SSTS (median 8.0/10 points, IQR 3). However, 51% of patients had difficulties with handling the SSTS and required acute replacement of the authentication tag.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSTS sufficiently treated acute postoperative pain without incidence of POD and demonstrated good tolerability and overall ease. Postoperative pain improved significantly over time but 22% still reported chronic pain related to surgery. Technical issues with the identification thumb tag limited the feasibility of SSTS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This prospective longitudinal cohort study was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Ethics committee 2, Campus Charité Virchow Klinikum, EA2/041/17, Prof. Dr. jur. R. Seeland, 21.03.2017) and was registered in the study register ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133858 ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00506-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00506-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性术后疼痛管理通常需要阿片类药物治疗与患者控制镇痛(PCA)。无创PCA伴舌下舒芬太尼片系统(SSTS)可充分减轻急性疼痛,但阿片类药物与中枢神经系统副作用和术后长期使用阿片类药物的风险相关。本研究的目的是观察SSTS以评估术后慢性疼痛(PCP)和术后谵妄(POD)的发生率。方法:这是一项纵向队列研究,于2017年11月至2021年11月在一所大学医院进行。成人接受选择性骨科膝关节或腹部手术计划为PCA术后疼痛管理包括在内。根据他们所接受的手术,他们除了接受标准化的止痛药治疗外,还接受了SSTS。排除标准为妊娠、急诊手术、同时参加另一项临床试验和术前长期使用阿片类药物。患者术后住院随访3个月和12个月,观察疼痛、认知功能和副作用。结果:80例患者术后纳入SSTS。每日疼痛经历从术前的89.2%下降到3个月和12个月时的45.7%和22.5%。所有患者均未出现术后谵妄。患者对SSTS的总体满意度较高(中位数为8.0/10分,IQR为3)。然而,51%的患者在处理SSTS时存在困难,需要紧急更换认证标签。结论:SSTS能有效治疗术后急性疼痛,无POD发生,耐受性好,整体缓解。术后疼痛随着时间的推移明显改善,但仍有22%的患者报告与手术相关的慢性疼痛。识别拇指标签的技术问题限制了SSTS的可行性。试验注册:本前瞻性纵向队列研究经柏林慈善基金会伦理委员会(伦理委员会2,Campus charity Virchow Klinikum, e02 /041/17, Prof. Dr. jurr .)批准。R. Seeland, 2017年3月21日),并已在研究登记处注册(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133858)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sublingual sufentanil after orthopaedic and abdominal surgery: long-term outcome and safety.

Background: Acute postoperative pain management often requires opioid treatment with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Non-invasive PCA with a sublingual sufentanil tablet system (SSTS) may reduce acute pain sufficiently, but opioids are associated with central nerve system side effects and risk of long-term opioid use postoperatively. The objective of this study was to observe the SSTS to assess the incidence of postoperative chronic pain (PCP) and postoperative delirium (POD).

Methods: This was a longitudinal cohort study based at a university hospital between November 2017 and November 2021. Adults undergoing elective orthopaedic knee or abdominal surgery planned for PCA as postoperative pain management were included. They received the SSTS in addition to a standardised pain medication protocol depending on the surgery they underwent. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, emergency surgery, concurrent participation in another clinical trial and chronic opioid use before surgery. Patients were followed after surgery in hospital and over 3 and 12 months for pain, cognitive function and side effects.

Results: Altogether N = 80 patients were included with SSTS postoperatively. Daily pain experience decreased from pre-operatively 89.2% of patients to 45.7% and 22.5% at 3 and 12 months. None of our patients developed postoperative delirium after surgery. Patients reported high overall satisfaction with SSTS (median 8.0/10 points, IQR 3). However, 51% of patients had difficulties with handling the SSTS and required acute replacement of the authentication tag.

Conclusions: SSTS sufficiently treated acute postoperative pain without incidence of POD and demonstrated good tolerability and overall ease. Postoperative pain improved significantly over time but 22% still reported chronic pain related to surgery. Technical issues with the identification thumb tag limited the feasibility of SSTS.

Trial registration: This prospective longitudinal cohort study was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Ethics committee 2, Campus Charité Virchow Klinikum, EA2/041/17, Prof. Dr. jur. R. Seeland, 21.03.2017) and was registered in the study register ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133858 ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信