心源性休克患者的 ECPella 5+:改善预后的潜力。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nicoletta D'Ettore, Astrid Cardinale, Giulia Maj, Stephanie Bertolin, Andrea Audo, Andrea Montisci, Alina Gallo, Corrado Cavozza, Federico Pappalardo
{"title":"心源性休克患者的 ECPella 5+:改善预后的潜力。","authors":"Nicoletta D'Ettore, Astrid Cardinale, Giulia Maj, Stephanie Bertolin, Andrea Audo, Andrea Montisci, Alina Gallo, Corrado Cavozza, Federico Pappalardo","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a common treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The combination therapy of VA- ECMO and Impella (ECPella) results in better outcomes. Currently, multiple generations of Impella are available for use in ECPella, however limited data exist to compare devices. Here, we explored whether ECPella 5+ adds further benefit to patient outcomes. We reviewed published studies focused on ECPella in CS to summarize clinical outcomes specifically pertaining to ECPella 5+. Findings were compared to outcomes from a contemporary cohort of 10 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock and treated with ECPella 5+ between January 2022 and May 2023. We evaluated 84 studies published in Pubmed between January 2017 and October 2023. Of these, 24 articles were selected for full analysis. Use of ECPella 5+ increased over time, with more than 50% of patients receiving this configuration in studies published in 2023. Mortality rate for ECPella 5+ (reported in 5 of 24 studies) was 33% compared to 49% for all ECPella combinations. Mortality outcomes of our patient cohort were consistent with a rate of 30%. These findings suggest that Impella 5+ may further improve outcomes of ECPella. However, the interpretation is limited by the small sample size and the descriptive nature of the data. Further larger, prospective studies are needed to determine potential improvements in complication rates, VA-ECMO and inotropic therapy duration, and native heart recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECPella 5+ in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Potential for Improved Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Nicoletta D'Ettore, Astrid Cardinale, Giulia Maj, Stephanie Bertolin, Andrea Audo, Andrea Montisci, Alina Gallo, Corrado Cavozza, Federico Pappalardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a common treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The combination therapy of VA- ECMO and Impella (ECPella) results in better outcomes. Currently, multiple generations of Impella are available for use in ECPella, however limited data exist to compare devices. Here, we explored whether ECPella 5+ adds further benefit to patient outcomes. We reviewed published studies focused on ECPella in CS to summarize clinical outcomes specifically pertaining to ECPella 5+. Findings were compared to outcomes from a contemporary cohort of 10 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock and treated with ECPella 5+ between January 2022 and May 2023. We evaluated 84 studies published in Pubmed between January 2017 and October 2023. Of these, 24 articles were selected for full analysis. Use of ECPella 5+ increased over time, with more than 50% of patients receiving this configuration in studies published in 2023. Mortality rate for ECPella 5+ (reported in 5 of 24 studies) was 33% compared to 49% for all ECPella combinations. Mortality outcomes of our patient cohort were consistent with a rate of 30%. These findings suggest that Impella 5+ may further improve outcomes of ECPella. However, the interpretation is limited by the small sample size and the descriptive nature of the data. Further larger, prospective studies are needed to determine potential improvements in complication rates, VA-ECMO and inotropic therapy duration, and native heart recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.02.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ECPella 5+ in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Potential for Improved Outcomes.

The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a common treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The combination therapy of VA- ECMO and Impella (ECPella) results in better outcomes. Currently, multiple generations of Impella are available for use in ECPella, however limited data exist to compare devices. Here, we explored whether ECPella 5+ adds further benefit to patient outcomes. We reviewed published studies focused on ECPella in CS to summarize clinical outcomes specifically pertaining to ECPella 5+. Findings were compared to outcomes from a contemporary cohort of 10 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock and treated with ECPella 5+ between January 2022 and May 2023. We evaluated 84 studies published in Pubmed between January 2017 and October 2023. Of these, 24 articles were selected for full analysis. Use of ECPella 5+ increased over time, with more than 50% of patients receiving this configuration in studies published in 2023. Mortality rate for ECPella 5+ (reported in 5 of 24 studies) was 33% compared to 49% for all ECPella combinations. Mortality outcomes of our patient cohort were consistent with a rate of 30%. These findings suggest that Impella 5+ may further improve outcomes of ECPella. However, the interpretation is limited by the small sample size and the descriptive nature of the data. Further larger, prospective studies are needed to determine potential improvements in complication rates, VA-ECMO and inotropic therapy duration, and native heart recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信