实施全民健康保险对埃及公共卫生设施受益人评价的影响——一项横断面研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ahmed S Hammad, Ahmed Yehia Khalifa, Gasser Gad ELKarim, Awad Mataria, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouad
{"title":"实施全民健康保险对埃及公共卫生设施受益人评价的影响——一项横断面研究。","authors":"Ahmed S Hammad, Ahmed Yehia Khalifa, Gasser Gad ELKarim, Awad Mataria, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouad","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02402-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal health coverage (UHC) is a key health policy priority to guarantee access to high-quality healthcare without causing undue financial hardship. After many attempts for health reform, Egypt has adopted the Universal Health Insurance (UHI) system in 2018. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of UHI implementation on beneficiaries' perspectives of public healthcare facilities during the early stages of implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 in Egypt, with 785 participants interviewed at UHI and non-UHI areas. All participants were interviewed using a questionnaire for sociodemographic characteristics, perceived health status, insurance plan, and Patient Evaluation Scale -Short form (PES-SF). Besides, participants were asked to report their general evaluation of overall quality, accessibility, and satisfaction with the healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 785 participants, 326 participants were UHI beneficiaries, while 459 were non-UHI enrollees. UHI was associated with a 4.71-point increase in the mean total PES-SF score compared to non-UHC (95% CI: 3.12-6.30, p < 0.001). UHI was associated with an 80% and 56% increase in the likelihood of reporting a good or more overall accessibility and general satisfaction with health facilities, compared to non-UHI, respectively (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.17-2.77, p = 0.008; OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.00-2.43, p = 0.048, respectively). However, perceived overall quality was not significantly associated with UHI status (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.74-1.71, p = 0.578).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study finding shows that UHI beneficiaries perceived a higher level of overall satisfaction and accessibility than non-UHI beneficiaries. However, no significant difference exists regarding the perceived overall quality of care. These findings provide valuable insights into the effect of UHI in Egypt and can inform evidence-based policymaking to strengthen the healthcare system and advance universal health coverage objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of universal health insurance implementation on beneficiaries' evaluation of public health facilities in Egypt - a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed S Hammad, Ahmed Yehia Khalifa, Gasser Gad ELKarim, Awad Mataria, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02402-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal health coverage (UHC) is a key health policy priority to guarantee access to high-quality healthcare without causing undue financial hardship. After many attempts for health reform, Egypt has adopted the Universal Health Insurance (UHI) system in 2018. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of UHI implementation on beneficiaries' perspectives of public healthcare facilities during the early stages of implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 in Egypt, with 785 participants interviewed at UHI and non-UHI areas. All participants were interviewed using a questionnaire for sociodemographic characteristics, perceived health status, insurance plan, and Patient Evaluation Scale -Short form (PES-SF). Besides, participants were asked to report their general evaluation of overall quality, accessibility, and satisfaction with the healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 785 participants, 326 participants were UHI beneficiaries, while 459 were non-UHI enrollees. UHI was associated with a 4.71-point increase in the mean total PES-SF score compared to non-UHC (95% CI: 3.12-6.30, p < 0.001). UHI was associated with an 80% and 56% increase in the likelihood of reporting a good or more overall accessibility and general satisfaction with health facilities, compared to non-UHI, respectively (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.17-2.77, p = 0.008; OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.00-2.43, p = 0.048, respectively). However, perceived overall quality was not significantly associated with UHI status (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.74-1.71, p = 0.578).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study finding shows that UHI beneficiaries perceived a higher level of overall satisfaction and accessibility than non-UHI beneficiaries. However, no significant difference exists regarding the perceived overall quality of care. These findings provide valuable insights into the effect of UHI in Egypt and can inform evidence-based policymaking to strengthen the healthcare system and advance universal health coverage objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02402-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02402-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全民健康覆盖(UHC)是一项关键的卫生政策重点,以确保获得高质量的卫生保健而不会造成不必要的经济困难。经过多次医疗改革尝试,埃及于2018年采用了全民健康保险(UHI)制度。本研究的目的是评估在实施初期,全民健康保险的实施对公共医疗机构受益人观点的影响。方法:从2021年到2022年在埃及进行了一项横断面研究,在UHI和非UHI地区采访了785名参与者。所有参与者使用社会人口学特征、感知健康状况、保险计划和患者评估量表-简短形式(PES-SF)问卷进行访谈。此外,参与者被要求报告他们对医疗保健服务的总体质量、可及性和满意度的总体评价。结果:在785名参与者中,326名参与者是UHI受益人,而459名参与者是非UHI参与者。与非全民健康覆盖相比,全民健康覆盖与平均总PES-SF评分增加4.71分相关(95% CI: 3.12-6.30, p)。结论:研究发现表明,全民健康覆盖受益人比非全民健康覆盖受益人感知到更高的总体满意度和可及性水平。然而,在感知整体护理质量方面没有显著差异。这些发现为埃及全民健康保险的效果提供了宝贵的见解,并可为基于证据的决策提供信息,以加强卫生保健系统和推进全民健康覆盖目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of universal health insurance implementation on beneficiaries' evaluation of public health facilities in Egypt - a cross-sectional study.

Background: Universal health coverage (UHC) is a key health policy priority to guarantee access to high-quality healthcare without causing undue financial hardship. After many attempts for health reform, Egypt has adopted the Universal Health Insurance (UHI) system in 2018. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of UHI implementation on beneficiaries' perspectives of public healthcare facilities during the early stages of implementation.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 in Egypt, with 785 participants interviewed at UHI and non-UHI areas. All participants were interviewed using a questionnaire for sociodemographic characteristics, perceived health status, insurance plan, and Patient Evaluation Scale -Short form (PES-SF). Besides, participants were asked to report their general evaluation of overall quality, accessibility, and satisfaction with the healthcare services.

Results: Out of 785 participants, 326 participants were UHI beneficiaries, while 459 were non-UHI enrollees. UHI was associated with a 4.71-point increase in the mean total PES-SF score compared to non-UHC (95% CI: 3.12-6.30, p < 0.001). UHI was associated with an 80% and 56% increase in the likelihood of reporting a good or more overall accessibility and general satisfaction with health facilities, compared to non-UHI, respectively (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.17-2.77, p = 0.008; OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.00-2.43, p = 0.048, respectively). However, perceived overall quality was not significantly associated with UHI status (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.74-1.71, p = 0.578).

Conclusions: The study finding shows that UHI beneficiaries perceived a higher level of overall satisfaction and accessibility than non-UHI beneficiaries. However, no significant difference exists regarding the perceived overall quality of care. These findings provide valuable insights into the effect of UHI in Egypt and can inform evidence-based policymaking to strengthen the healthcare system and advance universal health coverage objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信