基于特定国际建议的妇产医院母乳喂养推广评估——来自德国的经验

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Journal of Human Lactation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1177/08903344251318275
Merlin Blendermann, Nele Hockamp, Erika Sievers, Thomas Lücke, Mathilde Kersting
{"title":"基于特定国际建议的妇产医院母乳喂养推广评估——来自德国的经验","authors":"Merlin Blendermann, Nele Hockamp, Erika Sievers, Thomas Lücke, Mathilde Kersting","doi":"10.1177/08903344251318275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The staff of maternity hospitals play an essential role in the start of breastfeeding. This study assessed specific aspects of breastfeeding promotion in German hospitals using the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF).</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>To identify specific hospital practices and structures that are in compliance with the recommendations and those that still need to be improved.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey and descriptive analysis was conducted in 109 German hospitals. This web-based questionnaire examined the structural conditions and usual handling of breastfeeding support. Recommendations were reported using sub-criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implementation of the sub-criteria ranged from less than 25% to more than 90%. Hospitals were more likely to have a breastfeeding policy (85.3%, <i>n</i> = 93) than a breastfeeding coordinator (73.4%, <i>n</i> = 80). Immediate skin-to-skin contact after birth and early breastfeeding initiation were implemented more frequently after a vaginal (89.9%, <i>n</i> = 98 and 71.6%, <i>n</i> = 78) than after Cesarean delivery (45.9%, <i>n</i> = 50 and 54.1%, <i>n</i> = 59). Additional feeding of fluids was usually restricted to a medical indication (70.6%, <i>n</i> = 77), however, the decision to feed formula was rarely made by hospital staff alone (27.5%, <i>n</i> = 30). Large hospitals (> 1000 births/year) had a written breastfeeding policy and a breastfeeding coordinator more frequently than smaller hospitals (<i>p</i> < 0.01, Fisher's exact test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of sub-criteria of WHO recommendations helped identify critical parts of breastfeeding promotion in hospitals, providing concrete starting points for targeted interventions. This differentiated approach could be promising for future analyses of breastfeeding promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"220-230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Breastfeeding Promotion in Maternity Hospitals Based on Specified International Recommendations-Experiences From Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Merlin Blendermann, Nele Hockamp, Erika Sievers, Thomas Lücke, Mathilde Kersting\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08903344251318275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The staff of maternity hospitals play an essential role in the start of breastfeeding. This study assessed specific aspects of breastfeeding promotion in German hospitals using the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF).</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>To identify specific hospital practices and structures that are in compliance with the recommendations and those that still need to be improved.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey and descriptive analysis was conducted in 109 German hospitals. This web-based questionnaire examined the structural conditions and usual handling of breastfeeding support. Recommendations were reported using sub-criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implementation of the sub-criteria ranged from less than 25% to more than 90%. Hospitals were more likely to have a breastfeeding policy (85.3%, <i>n</i> = 93) than a breastfeeding coordinator (73.4%, <i>n</i> = 80). Immediate skin-to-skin contact after birth and early breastfeeding initiation were implemented more frequently after a vaginal (89.9%, <i>n</i> = 98 and 71.6%, <i>n</i> = 78) than after Cesarean delivery (45.9%, <i>n</i> = 50 and 54.1%, <i>n</i> = 59). Additional feeding of fluids was usually restricted to a medical indication (70.6%, <i>n</i> = 77), however, the decision to feed formula was rarely made by hospital staff alone (27.5%, <i>n</i> = 30). Large hospitals (> 1000 births/year) had a written breastfeeding policy and a breastfeeding coordinator more frequently than smaller hospitals (<i>p</i> < 0.01, Fisher's exact test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of sub-criteria of WHO recommendations helped identify critical parts of breastfeeding promotion in hospitals, providing concrete starting points for targeted interventions. This differentiated approach could be promising for future analyses of breastfeeding promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"220-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251318275\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251318275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妇产医院的工作人员在母乳喂养的开始中发挥着至关重要的作用。根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)和联合国儿童基金会(儿童基金会)的建议,这项研究评估了德国医院促进母乳喂养的具体方面。研究目的:确定符合建议的具体医院做法和结构以及仍需改进的做法和结构。方法:对109家德国医院进行横断面调查和描述性分析。这份基于网络的问卷调查了母乳喂养支持的结构条件和通常处理方式。建议是用次级标准报告的。结果:各子标准的执行率从25%以下到90%以上不等。医院更有可能制定母乳喂养政策(85.3%,n = 93),而不是母乳喂养协调员(73.4%,n = 80)。分娩后立即皮肤接触和早期母乳喂养在阴道分娩后(89.9%,n = 98和71.6%,n = 78)比剖宫产后(45.9%,n = 50和54.1%,n = 59)更频繁。额外的液体喂养通常仅限于医学指征(70.6%,n = 77),然而,很少由医院工作人员单独决定喂养配方奶(27.5%,n = 30)。与小医院相比,大医院(每年出生1000个婴儿)有书面的母乳喂养政策和母乳喂养协调员的频率更高(p结论:使用世卫组织建议的子标准有助于确定医院促进母乳喂养的关键部分,为有针对性的干预措施提供具体的起点。这种不同的方法可能对未来的母乳喂养促进分析有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Breastfeeding Promotion in Maternity Hospitals Based on Specified International Recommendations-Experiences From Germany.

Background: The staff of maternity hospitals play an essential role in the start of breastfeeding. This study assessed specific aspects of breastfeeding promotion in German hospitals using the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF).

Research aim: To identify specific hospital practices and structures that are in compliance with the recommendations and those that still need to be improved.

Method: A cross-sectional survey and descriptive analysis was conducted in 109 German hospitals. This web-based questionnaire examined the structural conditions and usual handling of breastfeeding support. Recommendations were reported using sub-criteria.

Results: The implementation of the sub-criteria ranged from less than 25% to more than 90%. Hospitals were more likely to have a breastfeeding policy (85.3%, n = 93) than a breastfeeding coordinator (73.4%, n = 80). Immediate skin-to-skin contact after birth and early breastfeeding initiation were implemented more frequently after a vaginal (89.9%, n = 98 and 71.6%, n = 78) than after Cesarean delivery (45.9%, n = 50 and 54.1%, n = 59). Additional feeding of fluids was usually restricted to a medical indication (70.6%, n = 77), however, the decision to feed formula was rarely made by hospital staff alone (27.5%, n = 30). Large hospitals (> 1000 births/year) had a written breastfeeding policy and a breastfeeding coordinator more frequently than smaller hospitals (p < 0.01, Fisher's exact test).

Conclusion: The use of sub-criteria of WHO recommendations helped identify critical parts of breastfeeding promotion in hospitals, providing concrete starting points for targeted interventions. This differentiated approach could be promising for future analyses of breastfeeding promotion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Lactation
Journal of Human Lactation 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are: To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities. To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL. In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features: Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信