心血管疾病脂质和脂蛋白生物标志物标准化。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Alicia N Lyle, Uliana Danilenko, Otoe Sugahara, Hubert W Vesper
{"title":"心血管疾病脂质和脂蛋白生物标志物标准化。","authors":"Alicia N Lyle, Uliana Danilenko, Otoe Sugahara, Hubert W Vesper","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2025.2462817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the United States and globally. This review describes changes in CVD lipid and lipoprotein biomarker measurements that occurred in line with the evolution of clinical practice guidelines for CVD risk assessment and treatment. It also discusses the level of comparability of these biomarker measurements in clinical practice. Comparable and reliable measurements are achieved through assay standardization, which not only depends on correct test calibration but also on factors such as analytical sensitivity, selectivity, susceptibility to factors that can affect the analytical measurement process, and the stability of the test system over time. The current status of standardization for traditional and newer CVD biomarkers is discussed, as are approaches to setting and achieving standardization goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), apolipoproteins (apo) A-I and B, and non-HDL-C. Appropriate levels of standardization for blood lipids are maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) CVD Biomarkers Standardization Program (CDC CVD BSP) using the analytical performance goals recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program. The level of measurement agreement that can be achieved is dependent on the characteristics of the analytes and differences in measurement principles between reference measurement procedures and clinical assays. The technical and analytical limitations observed with traditional blood lipids are not observed with apolipoproteins. Additionally, apoB and Lp(a) may more accurately capture CVD risk and residual CVD risk, respectively, than traditional lipids, thus prompting current guidelines to recommend apolipoprotein measurements. This review further discusses CDC's approach to standardization and describes the analytical performance of traditional blood lipids and apoA-I and B observed over the past 11 years. The reference systems for apoA-I and B, previously maintained by a single laboratory, no longer exist, thus requiring the creation of new systems, which is currently underway. This situation emphasizes the importance of a collaborative network of laboratories, such as CDC's Cholesterol Reference Methods Laboratory Network (CRMLN), to ensure standardization sustainability. CDC is supporting the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's (IFCC) work to establish such a network for lipoproteins. Ensuring comparability and reliability of CVD biomarker measurements through standardization remains critical for the effective implementation of clinical practice guidelines and for improving patient care. Utilizing experience gained over three decades, CDC CVD BSP will continue to improve the standardization of traditional and emerging CVD biomarkers together with stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular disease lipids and lipoproteins biomarker standardization.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia N Lyle, Uliana Danilenko, Otoe Sugahara, Hubert W Vesper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408363.2025.2462817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the United States and globally. This review describes changes in CVD lipid and lipoprotein biomarker measurements that occurred in line with the evolution of clinical practice guidelines for CVD risk assessment and treatment. It also discusses the level of comparability of these biomarker measurements in clinical practice. Comparable and reliable measurements are achieved through assay standardization, which not only depends on correct test calibration but also on factors such as analytical sensitivity, selectivity, susceptibility to factors that can affect the analytical measurement process, and the stability of the test system over time. The current status of standardization for traditional and newer CVD biomarkers is discussed, as are approaches to setting and achieving standardization goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), apolipoproteins (apo) A-I and B, and non-HDL-C. Appropriate levels of standardization for blood lipids are maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) CVD Biomarkers Standardization Program (CDC CVD BSP) using the analytical performance goals recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program. The level of measurement agreement that can be achieved is dependent on the characteristics of the analytes and differences in measurement principles between reference measurement procedures and clinical assays. The technical and analytical limitations observed with traditional blood lipids are not observed with apolipoproteins. Additionally, apoB and Lp(a) may more accurately capture CVD risk and residual CVD risk, respectively, than traditional lipids, thus prompting current guidelines to recommend apolipoprotein measurements. This review further discusses CDC's approach to standardization and describes the analytical performance of traditional blood lipids and apoA-I and B observed over the past 11 years. The reference systems for apoA-I and B, previously maintained by a single laboratory, no longer exist, thus requiring the creation of new systems, which is currently underway. This situation emphasizes the importance of a collaborative network of laboratories, such as CDC's Cholesterol Reference Methods Laboratory Network (CRMLN), to ensure standardization sustainability. CDC is supporting the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's (IFCC) work to establish such a network for lipoproteins. Ensuring comparability and reliability of CVD biomarker measurements through standardization remains critical for the effective implementation of clinical practice guidelines and for improving patient care. Utilizing experience gained over three decades, CDC CVD BSP will continue to improve the standardization of traditional and emerging CVD biomarkers together with stakeholders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2462817\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2462817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管疾病(CVD)是美国和全球死亡的主要原因。这篇综述描述了随着CVD风险评估和治疗的临床实践指南的发展,CVD脂质和脂蛋白生物标志物测量的变化。它还讨论了这些生物标志物测量在临床实践中的可比性水平。可比较和可靠的测量是通过分析标准化来实现的,这不仅取决于正确的测试校准,还取决于分析灵敏度、选择性、对可能影响分析测量过程的因素的敏感性以及测试系统随时间的稳定性等因素。本文讨论了传统和新型心血管疾病生物标志物的标准化现状,以及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、脂蛋白(a) (Lp(a))、载脂蛋白(apo) a - i和B以及非HDL-C标准化目标的设定和实现方法。适当的血脂标准化水平由疾病控制和预防中心(CDC) CVD生物标志物标准化计划(CDC CVD BSP)使用国家胆固醇教育计划推荐的分析性能目标来维持。可达到的测量一致性水平取决于分析物的特性以及参考测量程序和临床分析之间测量原理的差异。在传统血脂中观察到的技术和分析局限性在载脂蛋白中没有观察到。此外,载脂蛋白ob和脂蛋白(a)可能比传统的脂质更准确地分别捕获CVD风险和剩余CVD风险,因此促使当前的指南推荐载脂蛋白测量。这篇综述进一步讨论了CDC的标准化方法,并描述了过去11年来观察到的传统血脂和apoA-I和B的分析性能。以前由单一实验室维持的apoA-I和B参考系统已不复存在,因此需要建立新的系统,目前正在进行中。这种情况强调了实验室合作网络的重要性,例如CDC的胆固醇参考方法实验室网络(CRMLN),以确保标准化的可持续性。疾病预防控制中心正在支持国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)建立这样一个脂蛋白网络的工作。通过标准化确保CVD生物标志物测量的可比性和可靠性对于有效实施临床实践指南和改善患者护理至关重要。利用30多年来积累的经验,CDC CVD BSP将与利益相关者一起继续提高传统和新兴CVD生物标志物的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiovascular disease lipids and lipoproteins biomarker standardization.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the United States and globally. This review describes changes in CVD lipid and lipoprotein biomarker measurements that occurred in line with the evolution of clinical practice guidelines for CVD risk assessment and treatment. It also discusses the level of comparability of these biomarker measurements in clinical practice. Comparable and reliable measurements are achieved through assay standardization, which not only depends on correct test calibration but also on factors such as analytical sensitivity, selectivity, susceptibility to factors that can affect the analytical measurement process, and the stability of the test system over time. The current status of standardization for traditional and newer CVD biomarkers is discussed, as are approaches to setting and achieving standardization goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), apolipoproteins (apo) A-I and B, and non-HDL-C. Appropriate levels of standardization for blood lipids are maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) CVD Biomarkers Standardization Program (CDC CVD BSP) using the analytical performance goals recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program. The level of measurement agreement that can be achieved is dependent on the characteristics of the analytes and differences in measurement principles between reference measurement procedures and clinical assays. The technical and analytical limitations observed with traditional blood lipids are not observed with apolipoproteins. Additionally, apoB and Lp(a) may more accurately capture CVD risk and residual CVD risk, respectively, than traditional lipids, thus prompting current guidelines to recommend apolipoprotein measurements. This review further discusses CDC's approach to standardization and describes the analytical performance of traditional blood lipids and apoA-I and B observed over the past 11 years. The reference systems for apoA-I and B, previously maintained by a single laboratory, no longer exist, thus requiring the creation of new systems, which is currently underway. This situation emphasizes the importance of a collaborative network of laboratories, such as CDC's Cholesterol Reference Methods Laboratory Network (CRMLN), to ensure standardization sustainability. CDC is supporting the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine's (IFCC) work to establish such a network for lipoproteins. Ensuring comparability and reliability of CVD biomarker measurements through standardization remains critical for the effective implementation of clinical practice guidelines and for improving patient care. Utilizing experience gained over three decades, CDC CVD BSP will continue to improve the standardization of traditional and emerging CVD biomarkers together with stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信