终末期慢性肾病透析或血液透析患者社会资本问卷的设计与心理测量学验证

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alicia Alanis-Ocádiz, Svetlana V Doubova, José Manuel Arreola-Guerra, Adriana Monroy, Jannett Padilla-López, Carolina Quiñones-Villalobos, Carlos Alberto Prado-Aguilar
{"title":"终末期慢性肾病透析或血液透析患者社会资本问卷的设计与心理测量学验证","authors":"Alicia Alanis-Ocádiz, Svetlana V Doubova, José Manuel Arreola-Guerra, Adriana Monroy, Jannett Padilla-López, Carolina Quiñones-Villalobos, Carlos Alberto Prado-Aguilar","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-03993-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) can spill over into a patient's social life. Social capital (SC) is a determinant of health that can enhance patients' health through support and resources. However, no questionnaire is currently available to measure SC in ESKD patients. This study aimed to design and validate a questionnaire to measure SC in ESKD adults undergoing dialysis or hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used to generate the questionnaire and determine its content validity with a panel of nine experts and content validity index, face validity through cognitive interviews with patients, construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), criterion validity, reliability and the effect of known groups differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity was confirmed by an expert panel, achieving a content validity index value > 0.85 for all items. Face validity was achieved through cognitive interviews with 20 patients over 18 years of age in a terminal stage of CKD, ensuring that the target population understood the questions. An exploratory factor analysis used the sample of 610 patients and tested the structure of the seven dimensions of the structural domain (participation in organizations, links to institutions, social network sizes, collective activities, diversity, bridging, and bonding) and explained 95.7% of the total variance with a reliability of 0.89, and criterion validity > 0.32 (p < 0.05) for the correlations between the indices of each dimension and the domain index. The structure of the cognitive domain was tested for six dimensions (norms of reciprocity, social harmony, feeling of belonging, perceived fairness, social support, and social trust) with a total variance of 80.7%, reliability of 0.94 and criterion validity for correlations > 0.68 (p < 0.05). The confirmatory factor analysis with 352 patients proved the factorial structure adequate for both questionnaire domains and all dimensions, with CFI and TLI values > 0.9, an RMSEA ≤ 0.06, and SRMR ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the questionnaire designed to measure social capital is valid and reliable for ESKD patients in Mexico.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and psychometric validation of a social capital questionnaire for adults with end-stage chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis or hemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Alanis-Ocádiz, Svetlana V Doubova, José Manuel Arreola-Guerra, Adriana Monroy, Jannett Padilla-López, Carolina Quiñones-Villalobos, Carlos Alberto Prado-Aguilar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-025-03993-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) can spill over into a patient's social life. Social capital (SC) is a determinant of health that can enhance patients' health through support and resources. However, no questionnaire is currently available to measure SC in ESKD patients. This study aimed to design and validate a questionnaire to measure SC in ESKD adults undergoing dialysis or hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used to generate the questionnaire and determine its content validity with a panel of nine experts and content validity index, face validity through cognitive interviews with patients, construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), criterion validity, reliability and the effect of known groups differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity was confirmed by an expert panel, achieving a content validity index value > 0.85 for all items. Face validity was achieved through cognitive interviews with 20 patients over 18 years of age in a terminal stage of CKD, ensuring that the target population understood the questions. An exploratory factor analysis used the sample of 610 patients and tested the structure of the seven dimensions of the structural domain (participation in organizations, links to institutions, social network sizes, collective activities, diversity, bridging, and bonding) and explained 95.7% of the total variance with a reliability of 0.89, and criterion validity > 0.32 (p < 0.05) for the correlations between the indices of each dimension and the domain index. The structure of the cognitive domain was tested for six dimensions (norms of reciprocity, social harmony, feeling of belonging, perceived fairness, social support, and social trust) with a total variance of 80.7%, reliability of 0.94 and criterion validity for correlations > 0.68 (p < 0.05). The confirmatory factor analysis with 352 patients proved the factorial structure adequate for both questionnaire domains and all dimensions, with CFI and TLI values > 0.9, an RMSEA ≤ 0.06, and SRMR ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the questionnaire designed to measure social capital is valid and reliable for ESKD patients in Mexico.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-03993-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-03993-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:终末期肾脏疾病(ESKD)的影响会波及到患者的社会生活。社会资本(SC)是健康的决定因素,可以通过支持和资源来改善患者的健康。然而,目前还没有问卷来测量ESKD患者的SC。本研究旨在设计并验证一份问卷,以测量接受透析或血液透析的ESKD成人的SC。方法:采用混合方法编制问卷,由9位专家组成的小组和内容效度指标确定问卷的内容效度,通过对患者的认知访谈确定问卷的面孔效度,通过结构效度(探索性和验证性因子分析)确定问卷的效度、标准效度、信度和已知组差异的影响。结果:内容效度经专家组确认,各项目内容效度指标> 0.85。面部效度是通过对20名18岁以上CKD终末期患者的认知访谈来实现的,以确保目标人群理解问题。探索性因子分析使用610例患者的样本,并测试了结构域的七个维度(组织参与,与机构的联系,社会网络规模,集体活动,多样性,桥接和联系)的结构,并解释了95.7%的总方差,信度为0.89,效度>.32 (p 0.68 (p 0.9), RMSEA≤0.06,SRMR≤0.05)。结论:本文所设计的社会资本量表对墨西哥ESKD患者是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and psychometric validation of a social capital questionnaire for adults with end-stage chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis or hemodialysis.

Background: The effects of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) can spill over into a patient's social life. Social capital (SC) is a determinant of health that can enhance patients' health through support and resources. However, no questionnaire is currently available to measure SC in ESKD patients. This study aimed to design and validate a questionnaire to measure SC in ESKD adults undergoing dialysis or hemodialysis.

Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to generate the questionnaire and determine its content validity with a panel of nine experts and content validity index, face validity through cognitive interviews with patients, construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), criterion validity, reliability and the effect of known groups differences.

Results: Content validity was confirmed by an expert panel, achieving a content validity index value > 0.85 for all items. Face validity was achieved through cognitive interviews with 20 patients over 18 years of age in a terminal stage of CKD, ensuring that the target population understood the questions. An exploratory factor analysis used the sample of 610 patients and tested the structure of the seven dimensions of the structural domain (participation in organizations, links to institutions, social network sizes, collective activities, diversity, bridging, and bonding) and explained 95.7% of the total variance with a reliability of 0.89, and criterion validity > 0.32 (p < 0.05) for the correlations between the indices of each dimension and the domain index. The structure of the cognitive domain was tested for six dimensions (norms of reciprocity, social harmony, feeling of belonging, perceived fairness, social support, and social trust) with a total variance of 80.7%, reliability of 0.94 and criterion validity for correlations > 0.68 (p < 0.05). The confirmatory factor analysis with 352 patients proved the factorial structure adequate for both questionnaire domains and all dimensions, with CFI and TLI values > 0.9, an RMSEA ≤ 0.06, and SRMR ≤ 0.05.

Conclusions: We conclude that the questionnaire designed to measure social capital is valid and reliable for ESKD patients in Mexico.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信