{"title":"热带生态位保守性和扩散限制共同决定了中国东部蜥目动物的分类和系统发育多样性","authors":"Zhenyuan Liu, Bo-Ping Han, Janne Soininen","doi":"10.1111/geb.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Tropical niche conservatism (TNC) and dispersal limitation (DL) are major ecological and evolutionary mechanisms in shaping taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities. While these mechanisms have been studied in plants and vertebrates, their roles in freshwater taxa remain unclear. We leveraged Odonata species distribution and phylogenetic data to map geographical patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities, and to determine whether Odonata β-diversity is primarily shaped by TNC or DL and whether temperature seasonality is a key driver determining TNC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Eastern China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Odonata.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A moving window containing nine grids of 50 × 50 km was employed to quantify taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities, including their turnover and nestedness components. A null model was utilised to calculate randomly expected phylogenetic β-diversity based on observed taxonomic β-diversity and site-specific regional species pools. The generalised dissimilarity model was used to assess the roles of climatic and geographic distances shaping β-diversity and to identify the key climatic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Taxonomic total β-diversity and its turnover component were generally higher than phylogenetic β-diversity in most Odonata communities, with phylogenetic β-diversity being relatively higher mainly in tropical regions. Current climatic factors independently explained slightly more of the variation in total β-diversity than geographic distance alone, while geographic distance independently explained slightly greater proportions of deviance in turnover components. However, their joint effects accounted for an even larger part of the variation in β-diversity. The key climatic predictors were temperature seasonality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Current climatic factors, particularly temperature seasonality, largely shape taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities of Odonata communities. Spatial turnover along the climatic gradient tends to involve phylogenetically related taxa, resulting in overall higher taxonomic than phylogenetic β-diversity, supporting the TNC. The joint effects of climatic and geographic distances highlight the roles of climate, interacting with topographic complexity, shaping taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities of Odonata in eastern China.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tropical Niche Conservatism and Dispersal Limitation Jointly Determine Taxonomic and Phylogenetic β-Diversities of Odonata in Eastern China\",\"authors\":\"Zhenyuan Liu, Bo-Ping Han, Janne Soininen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Tropical niche conservatism (TNC) and dispersal limitation (DL) are major ecological and evolutionary mechanisms in shaping taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities. While these mechanisms have been studied in plants and vertebrates, their roles in freshwater taxa remain unclear. We leveraged Odonata species distribution and phylogenetic data to map geographical patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities, and to determine whether Odonata β-diversity is primarily shaped by TNC or DL and whether temperature seasonality is a key driver determining TNC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eastern China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Present.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Odonata.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A moving window containing nine grids of 50 × 50 km was employed to quantify taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities, including their turnover and nestedness components. A null model was utilised to calculate randomly expected phylogenetic β-diversity based on observed taxonomic β-diversity and site-specific regional species pools. The generalised dissimilarity model was used to assess the roles of climatic and geographic distances shaping β-diversity and to identify the key climatic factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Taxonomic total β-diversity and its turnover component were generally higher than phylogenetic β-diversity in most Odonata communities, with phylogenetic β-diversity being relatively higher mainly in tropical regions. Current climatic factors independently explained slightly more of the variation in total β-diversity than geographic distance alone, while geographic distance independently explained slightly greater proportions of deviance in turnover components. However, their joint effects accounted for an even larger part of the variation in β-diversity. The key climatic predictors were temperature seasonality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Current climatic factors, particularly temperature seasonality, largely shape taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities of Odonata communities. Spatial turnover along the climatic gradient tends to involve phylogenetically related taxa, resulting in overall higher taxonomic than phylogenetic β-diversity, supporting the TNC. The joint effects of climatic and geographic distances highlight the roles of climate, interacting with topographic complexity, shaping taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities of Odonata in eastern China.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tropical Niche Conservatism and Dispersal Limitation Jointly Determine Taxonomic and Phylogenetic β-Diversities of Odonata in Eastern China
Aim
Tropical niche conservatism (TNC) and dispersal limitation (DL) are major ecological and evolutionary mechanisms in shaping taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities. While these mechanisms have been studied in plants and vertebrates, their roles in freshwater taxa remain unclear. We leveraged Odonata species distribution and phylogenetic data to map geographical patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities, and to determine whether Odonata β-diversity is primarily shaped by TNC or DL and whether temperature seasonality is a key driver determining TNC.
Location
Eastern China.
Time Period
Present.
Major Taxa Studied
Odonata.
Methods
A moving window containing nine grids of 50 × 50 km was employed to quantify taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities, including their turnover and nestedness components. A null model was utilised to calculate randomly expected phylogenetic β-diversity based on observed taxonomic β-diversity and site-specific regional species pools. The generalised dissimilarity model was used to assess the roles of climatic and geographic distances shaping β-diversity and to identify the key climatic factors.
Results
Taxonomic total β-diversity and its turnover component were generally higher than phylogenetic β-diversity in most Odonata communities, with phylogenetic β-diversity being relatively higher mainly in tropical regions. Current climatic factors independently explained slightly more of the variation in total β-diversity than geographic distance alone, while geographic distance independently explained slightly greater proportions of deviance in turnover components. However, their joint effects accounted for an even larger part of the variation in β-diversity. The key climatic predictors were temperature seasonality.
Main Conclusions
Current climatic factors, particularly temperature seasonality, largely shape taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities of Odonata communities. Spatial turnover along the climatic gradient tends to involve phylogenetically related taxa, resulting in overall higher taxonomic than phylogenetic β-diversity, supporting the TNC. The joint effects of climatic and geographic distances highlight the roles of climate, interacting with topographic complexity, shaping taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversities of Odonata in eastern China.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.