以左心室/左心室比值定义的左心室毒株在急性肺栓塞中的诊断和预后价值:系统综述

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ankit Hanmandlu, Aniruddh Mannari, Aiden Abidov
{"title":"以左心室/左心室比值定义的左心室毒株在急性肺栓塞中的诊断和预后价值:系统综述","authors":"Ankit Hanmandlu,&nbsp;Aniruddh Mannari,&nbsp;Aiden Abidov","doi":"10.1111/echo.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio &gt;1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of RV Strain Defined as RV/LV Ratio on Chest CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Ankit Hanmandlu,&nbsp;Aniruddh Mannari,&nbsp;Aiden Abidov\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/echo.70107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio &gt;1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺栓塞(PE)是急性左心室扩大(常被描述为左心室毒株或RV- s)的常见原因,具有显著的相关死亡率和发病率。如果PE呈阳性,胸部CT肺血管造影是一种广泛使用的诊断方法,可用于排除PE和评估RV-S。通常,通过测量右心室(RV)与左心室(LV)的比值(RV/LV ratio)来评估RV- s;然而,没有标准化的技术来测量CT的RV/LV比值,该指标的预后价值也不明确。方法检索PubMed和EMBASE数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年12月。根据数据的相关性、完整性和质量,共有35项研究符合数据收集条件。结果临床上最常见的左室/左室比有效临界值分别为0.9和1.0,最常见的方法是在2D(轴向)和重建4室(4-Ch)视图上测量同一轴向切片内的左室和左室直径。虽然4-Ch视图和轴向视图对于特定结果(如30天死亡)具有不同的RV/LV比值可预测性,但在使用的不同截止点之间,预后价值没有显着的总体差异。结论:我们的研究表明,在测量急性肺动脉栓塞的CT RV/LV比值时缺乏明确的标准化。基于我们的综述,我们提出了一个定义为CT RV/LV比值>;1.0的左心室应变,在单轴CT片上测量,作为急性PE中容易测量和可靠的右心室功能障碍的标志,在预测不良结局方面具有重要的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of RV Strain Defined as RV/LV Ratio on Chest CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review

Background

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.

Results

The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio >1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信