{"title":"以左心室/左心室比值定义的左心室毒株在急性肺栓塞中的诊断和预后价值:系统综述","authors":"Ankit Hanmandlu, Aniruddh Mannari, Aiden Abidov","doi":"10.1111/echo.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio >1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of RV Strain Defined as RV/LV Ratio on Chest CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Ankit Hanmandlu, Aniruddh Mannari, Aiden Abidov\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/echo.70107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio >1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of RV Strain Defined as RV/LV Ratio on Chest CT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review
Background
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of acute RV enlargement (often described as RV strain or RV-S), with significant associated mortality and morbidity. Chest CT pulmonary angiography is a widely available diagnostic modality to rule out PE and assess for RV-S, if positive for PE. Frequently, RV-S is assessed by measuring the right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) ratio (RV/LV ratio); however, there is no standardized technique for measuring CT RV/LV ratio, and the prognostic value of this marker is not well-defined.
Methods
PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2023. A total of 35 studies were eligible for data collection based on relevance, completeness, and quality of data.
Results
The most common clinically effective cutoffs of the RV/LV ratio used were 0.9 and 1.0, and the most common methodology involved measuring RV and LV diameters within the same axial slice on both 2D (axial) and reconstructed 4-Chamber (4-Ch) views. Although 4-Ch and axial views had different RV/LV ratio predictability regarding specific outcomes such as 30-day death, there was no significant overall difference in the prognostic value across the different cutoffs used.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates a lack of definite standardization in measuring CT RV/LV ratio in acute PE. Based on our review, we propose an RV strain defined as CT RV/LV ratio >1.0 measured on a single axial CT slice as an easily measurable and reliable marker of RV dysfunction in acute PE, with associated significant prognostic value in predicting adverse outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.