Émile Brisson-Curadeau, Rose Lacombe, Marianne Gousy-Leblanc, Vanessa Poirier, Lauren Jackson, Christina Petalas, Eliane Miranda, Alyssa Eby, Julia Baak, Don-Jean Léandri-Breton, Emily Choy, Jade Legros, Elena Tranze-Drabinia, Kyle H Elliott
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the impact of drones on birds","authors":"Émile Brisson-Curadeau, Rose Lacombe, Marianne Gousy-Leblanc, Vanessa Poirier, Lauren Jackson, Christina Petalas, Eliane Miranda, Alyssa Eby, Julia Baak, Don-Jean Léandri-Breton, Emily Choy, Jade Legros, Elena Tranze-Drabinia, Kyle H Elliott","doi":"10.1002/fee.2809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drones are increasingly being used to monitor, film, and survey birds. Many studies also report that, as compared to traditional methods such as ground counts or helicopter surveys, drones can reduce bird disturbance. Yet, best practices on how drones should be flown to reduce adverse behavior are usually species-specific and context-dependent, and are therefore often difficult to apply to new management scenarios. Here, we reviewed 149 avian studies, all of which involved drone use and were published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and conducted a phylogenetically informed meta-analysis to better understand which factors can help to reduce flushing response in birds. The distance between the drone and the bird, drone speed, bird breeding status, and species size all strongly influenced the chances of a flushing response. Finally, we provide drone operational guidelines that are specific to and applicable across both drone type and taxa of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2809","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drones are increasingly being used to monitor, film, and survey birds. Many studies also report that, as compared to traditional methods such as ground counts or helicopter surveys, drones can reduce bird disturbance. Yet, best practices on how drones should be flown to reduce adverse behavior are usually species-specific and context-dependent, and are therefore often difficult to apply to new management scenarios. Here, we reviewed 149 avian studies, all of which involved drone use and were published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and conducted a phylogenetically informed meta-analysis to better understand which factors can help to reduce flushing response in birds. The distance between the drone and the bird, drone speed, bird breeding status, and species size all strongly influenced the chances of a flushing response. Finally, we provide drone operational guidelines that are specific to and applicable across both drone type and taxa of interest.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas.
The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.