IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Émile Brisson-Curadeau, Rose Lacombe, Marianne Gousy-Leblanc, Vanessa Poirier, Lauren Jackson, Christina Petalas, Eliane Miranda, Alyssa Eby, Julia Baak, Don-Jean Léandri-Breton, Emily Choy, Jade Legros, Elena Tranze-Drabinia, Kyle H Elliott
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the impact of drones on birds","authors":"Émile Brisson-Curadeau,&nbsp;Rose Lacombe,&nbsp;Marianne Gousy-Leblanc,&nbsp;Vanessa Poirier,&nbsp;Lauren Jackson,&nbsp;Christina Petalas,&nbsp;Eliane Miranda,&nbsp;Alyssa Eby,&nbsp;Julia Baak,&nbsp;Don-Jean Léandri-Breton,&nbsp;Emily Choy,&nbsp;Jade Legros,&nbsp;Elena Tranze-Drabinia,&nbsp;Kyle H Elliott","doi":"10.1002/fee.2809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drones are increasingly being used to monitor, film, and survey birds. Many studies also report that, as compared to traditional methods such as ground counts or helicopter surveys, drones can reduce bird disturbance. Yet, best practices on how drones should be flown to reduce adverse behavior are usually species-specific and context-dependent, and are therefore often difficult to apply to new management scenarios. Here, we reviewed 149 avian studies, all of which involved drone use and were published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and conducted a phylogenetically informed meta-analysis to better understand which factors can help to reduce flushing response in birds. The distance between the drone and the bird, drone speed, bird breeding status, and species size all strongly influenced the chances of a flushing response. Finally, we provide drone operational guidelines that are specific to and applicable across both drone type and taxa of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2809","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无人机越来越多地被用于监测、拍摄和调查鸟类。许多研究还报告称,与地面计数或直升机调查等传统方法相比,无人机可以减少对鸟类的干扰。然而,关于无人机应如何飞行以减少不良行为的最佳实践通常是针对特定物种并取决于具体情况的,因此通常很难应用到新的管理方案中。在此,我们回顾了 149 项鸟类研究,所有这些研究都涉及无人机的使用,并发表在同行评审的科学期刊上,我们还进行了系统发育荟萃分析,以更好地了解哪些因素有助于减少鸟类的冲洗反应。无人机与鸟类之间的距离、无人机的速度、鸟类的繁殖状况以及鸟类的大小都对鸟类发生冲撞反应的几率有很大影响。最后,我们提供了具体适用于无人机类型和感兴趣类群的无人机操作指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A meta-analysis of the impact of drones on birds

A meta-analysis of the impact of drones on birds

Drones are increasingly being used to monitor, film, and survey birds. Many studies also report that, as compared to traditional methods such as ground counts or helicopter surveys, drones can reduce bird disturbance. Yet, best practices on how drones should be flown to reduce adverse behavior are usually species-specific and context-dependent, and are therefore often difficult to apply to new management scenarios. Here, we reviewed 149 avian studies, all of which involved drone use and were published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and conducted a phylogenetically informed meta-analysis to better understand which factors can help to reduce flushing response in birds. The distance between the drone and the bird, drone speed, bird breeding status, and species size all strongly influenced the chances of a flushing response. Finally, we provide drone operational guidelines that are specific to and applicable across both drone type and taxa of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信