全球和区域海洋生态系统模式揭示气候变化预估中的关键不确定性

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1029/2024EF005537
Tyler D. Eddy, Ryan F. Heneghan, Andrea Bryndum-Buchholz, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Cheryl S. Harrison, Derek P. Tittensor, Heike K. Lotze, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Daniele Bianchi, Matthias Büchner, Catherine Bulman, William W. L. Cheung, Villy Christensen, Marta Coll, Jason D. Everett, Denisse Fierro-Arcos, Eric D. Galbraith, Didier Gascuel, Jerome Guiet, Steve Mackinson, Olivier Maury, Susa Niiranen, Ricardo Oliveros-Ramos, Juliano Palacios-Abrantes, Chiara Piroddi, Hubert du Pontavice, Jonathan Reum, Anthony J. Richardson, Jacob Schewe, Lynne Shannon, Yunne-Jai Shin, Jeroen Steenbeek, Jan Volkholz, Nicola D. Walker, Phoebe Woodworth-Jefcoats, Julia L. Blanchard
{"title":"全球和区域海洋生态系统模式揭示气候变化预估中的关键不确定性","authors":"Tyler D. Eddy,&nbsp;Ryan F. Heneghan,&nbsp;Andrea Bryndum-Buchholz,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Fulton,&nbsp;Cheryl S. Harrison,&nbsp;Derek P. Tittensor,&nbsp;Heike K. Lotze,&nbsp;Kelly Ortega-Cisneros,&nbsp;Camilla Novaglio,&nbsp;Daniele Bianchi,&nbsp;Matthias Büchner,&nbsp;Catherine Bulman,&nbsp;William W. L. Cheung,&nbsp;Villy Christensen,&nbsp;Marta Coll,&nbsp;Jason D. Everett,&nbsp;Denisse Fierro-Arcos,&nbsp;Eric D. Galbraith,&nbsp;Didier Gascuel,&nbsp;Jerome Guiet,&nbsp;Steve Mackinson,&nbsp;Olivier Maury,&nbsp;Susa Niiranen,&nbsp;Ricardo Oliveros-Ramos,&nbsp;Juliano Palacios-Abrantes,&nbsp;Chiara Piroddi,&nbsp;Hubert du Pontavice,&nbsp;Jonathan Reum,&nbsp;Anthony J. Richardson,&nbsp;Jacob Schewe,&nbsp;Lynne Shannon,&nbsp;Yunne-Jai Shin,&nbsp;Jeroen Steenbeek,&nbsp;Jan Volkholz,&nbsp;Nicola D. Walker,&nbsp;Phoebe Woodworth-Jefcoats,&nbsp;Julia L. Blanchard","doi":"10.1029/2024EF005537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change is affecting ocean temperature, acidity, currents, and primary production, causing shifts in species distributions, marine ecosystems, and ultimately fisheries. Earth system models simulate climate change impacts on physical and biogeochemical properties of future oceans under varying emissions scenarios. Coupling these simulations with an ensemble of global marine ecosystem models has indicated broad decreases of fish biomass with warming. However, regional details of these impacts remain much more uncertain. Here, we employ CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate change impact projections using two Earth system models coupled with four regional and nine global marine ecosystem models in 10 ocean regions to evaluate model agreement at regional scales. We find that models developed at different scales can lead to stark differences in biomass projections. On average, global models projected greater biomass declines by the end of the 21st century than regional models. For both global and regional models, greater biomass declines were projected using CMIP6 than CMIP5 simulations. Global models projected biomass declines in 86% of CMIP5 simulations for ocean regions compared to 50% for regional models in the same ocean regions. In CMIP6 simulations, all global model simulations projected biomass declines in ocean regions by 2100, while regional models projected biomass declines in 67% of the ocean region simulations. Our analysis suggests that improved understanding of the causes of differences between global and regional marine ecosystem model climate change projections is needed, alongside observational evaluation of modeled responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF005537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global and Regional Marine Ecosystem Models Reveal Key Uncertainties in Climate Change Projections\",\"authors\":\"Tyler D. Eddy,&nbsp;Ryan F. Heneghan,&nbsp;Andrea Bryndum-Buchholz,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Fulton,&nbsp;Cheryl S. Harrison,&nbsp;Derek P. Tittensor,&nbsp;Heike K. Lotze,&nbsp;Kelly Ortega-Cisneros,&nbsp;Camilla Novaglio,&nbsp;Daniele Bianchi,&nbsp;Matthias Büchner,&nbsp;Catherine Bulman,&nbsp;William W. L. Cheung,&nbsp;Villy Christensen,&nbsp;Marta Coll,&nbsp;Jason D. Everett,&nbsp;Denisse Fierro-Arcos,&nbsp;Eric D. Galbraith,&nbsp;Didier Gascuel,&nbsp;Jerome Guiet,&nbsp;Steve Mackinson,&nbsp;Olivier Maury,&nbsp;Susa Niiranen,&nbsp;Ricardo Oliveros-Ramos,&nbsp;Juliano Palacios-Abrantes,&nbsp;Chiara Piroddi,&nbsp;Hubert du Pontavice,&nbsp;Jonathan Reum,&nbsp;Anthony J. Richardson,&nbsp;Jacob Schewe,&nbsp;Lynne Shannon,&nbsp;Yunne-Jai Shin,&nbsp;Jeroen Steenbeek,&nbsp;Jan Volkholz,&nbsp;Nicola D. Walker,&nbsp;Phoebe Woodworth-Jefcoats,&nbsp;Julia L. Blanchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024EF005537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Climate change is affecting ocean temperature, acidity, currents, and primary production, causing shifts in species distributions, marine ecosystems, and ultimately fisheries. Earth system models simulate climate change impacts on physical and biogeochemical properties of future oceans under varying emissions scenarios. Coupling these simulations with an ensemble of global marine ecosystem models has indicated broad decreases of fish biomass with warming. However, regional details of these impacts remain much more uncertain. Here, we employ CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate change impact projections using two Earth system models coupled with four regional and nine global marine ecosystem models in 10 ocean regions to evaluate model agreement at regional scales. We find that models developed at different scales can lead to stark differences in biomass projections. On average, global models projected greater biomass declines by the end of the 21st century than regional models. For both global and regional models, greater biomass declines were projected using CMIP6 than CMIP5 simulations. Global models projected biomass declines in 86% of CMIP5 simulations for ocean regions compared to 50% for regional models in the same ocean regions. In CMIP6 simulations, all global model simulations projected biomass declines in ocean regions by 2100, while regional models projected biomass declines in 67% of the ocean region simulations. Our analysis suggests that improved understanding of the causes of differences between global and regional marine ecosystem model climate change projections is needed, alongside observational evaluation of modeled responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earths Future\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF005537\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earths Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF005537\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF005537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化正在影响海洋温度、酸度、洋流和初级生产,导致物种分布、海洋生态系统以及最终渔业的变化。地球系统模型模拟了气候变化对不同排放情景下未来海洋物理和生物地球化学特性的影响。将这些模拟与全球海洋生态系统模型集合相结合表明,随着气候变暖,鱼类生物量普遍减少。然而,这些影响的区域细节仍然不确定得多。本文采用CMIP5和CMIP6气候变化影响预估,采用2种地球系统模式,结合4种区域和9种全球海洋生态系统模式,在10个海洋区域评估模式的一致性。我们发现,在不同尺度上开发的模型可以导致生物量预测的明显差异。平均而言,到21世纪末,全球模式预测的生物量下降幅度大于区域模式。对于全球和区域模式,使用CMIP6预测的生物量下降幅度都大于CMIP5模拟。全球模式预测86%的CMIP5海洋区域模拟的生物量下降,而相同海洋区域的区域模式预测的生物量下降为50%。在CMIP6模拟中,所有全球模式模拟都预测到2100年海洋区域的生物量下降,而区域模式预测67%的海洋区域模拟的生物量下降。我们的分析表明,除了对模拟响应的观测评估外,还需要提高对全球和区域海洋生态系统模式气候变化预测之间差异的原因的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Global and Regional Marine Ecosystem Models Reveal Key Uncertainties in Climate Change Projections

Global and Regional Marine Ecosystem Models Reveal Key Uncertainties in Climate Change Projections

Climate change is affecting ocean temperature, acidity, currents, and primary production, causing shifts in species distributions, marine ecosystems, and ultimately fisheries. Earth system models simulate climate change impacts on physical and biogeochemical properties of future oceans under varying emissions scenarios. Coupling these simulations with an ensemble of global marine ecosystem models has indicated broad decreases of fish biomass with warming. However, regional details of these impacts remain much more uncertain. Here, we employ CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate change impact projections using two Earth system models coupled with four regional and nine global marine ecosystem models in 10 ocean regions to evaluate model agreement at regional scales. We find that models developed at different scales can lead to stark differences in biomass projections. On average, global models projected greater biomass declines by the end of the 21st century than regional models. For both global and regional models, greater biomass declines were projected using CMIP6 than CMIP5 simulations. Global models projected biomass declines in 86% of CMIP5 simulations for ocean regions compared to 50% for regional models in the same ocean regions. In CMIP6 simulations, all global model simulations projected biomass declines in ocean regions by 2100, while regional models projected biomass declines in 67% of the ocean region simulations. Our analysis suggests that improved understanding of the causes of differences between global and regional marine ecosystem model climate change projections is needed, alongside observational evaluation of modeled responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信