相似但独特:桉树纯种和种间杂交无性系对干旱的生理反应和生长

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Trees Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1007/s00468-025-02609-x
José Gándara, Matías Nión, Jaime González-Tálice, Silvia Ross, Juan Villar, María Elena Fernández
{"title":"相似但独特:桉树纯种和种间杂交无性系对干旱的生理反应和生长","authors":"José Gándara,&nbsp;Matías Nión,&nbsp;Jaime González-Tálice,&nbsp;Silvia Ross,&nbsp;Juan Villar,&nbsp;María Elena Fernández","doi":"10.1007/s00468-025-02609-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Key message</h3><p><i>Eucalyptus grandis</i> and hybrids with red gums and <i>E. urophylla</i> exhibit different strategies to deal with long-term drought, involving differences in stomatal regulation, plant hydraulics, and growth.</p><h3>Abstract</h3><p><i>Eucalyptus</i> species are important in commercial forestry for their rapid growth and adaptability. In the context of climate change, evaluating the drought responses of different genotypes is critical for enhancing resilience and productivity. Genetic improvement often involves crossing fast-growing, high-quality species with drought-tolerant ones. Understanding trade-offs in pure species and hybrids is essential for optimizing forest management. This study examined physiologic and growth responses to water restriction (WR) of <i>E. grandis</i> (GG), <i>E. grandis</i> × <i>E. camaldulensis</i> (GC), <i>E. grandis</i> × <i>E. tereticornis</i> (GT), and <i>E. grandis</i> × <i>E. urophylla</i> (GU1 and GU2) clones at the sapling stage across two drought cycles. Measurements included leaf-water potential (Ψ), relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (<i>g</i><sub>S</sub>), pressure–volume traits, hydraulic conductivities (k<sub>S</sub>, k<sub>L</sub>), percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC), specific leaf area (SLA), and chlorophyll content. Results revealed different drought response strategies among clones. GC and GT hybrids were more “water spenders”, exhibiting high PLC (&gt; 80%) due to limited stomatal closure, along with higher chlorophyll levels that maximized carbon gain and growth under drought. GC exhibited both elastic and osmotic adjustment, while GT showed only elastic adjustment. GG was the most drought-sensitive clone, relying on strong stomatal control, osmotic adjustment, and low cavitation, which limited carbon assimilation and resulted in the greatest growth reduction. GU hybrids shared physiologic similarities with GG but showed varying growth responses to WR. These findings suggest some hybrid clones may outperform pure <i>E. grandis</i> under WR, with significant genotype variation even among hybrids sharing similar parental species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":805,"journal":{"name":"Trees","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similar but unique: physiological response to drought and growth of pure species and interspecific hybrid clones of Eucalyptus\",\"authors\":\"José Gándara,&nbsp;Matías Nión,&nbsp;Jaime González-Tálice,&nbsp;Silvia Ross,&nbsp;Juan Villar,&nbsp;María Elena Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00468-025-02609-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Key message</h3><p><i>Eucalyptus grandis</i> and hybrids with red gums and <i>E. urophylla</i> exhibit different strategies to deal with long-term drought, involving differences in stomatal regulation, plant hydraulics, and growth.</p><h3>Abstract</h3><p><i>Eucalyptus</i> species are important in commercial forestry for their rapid growth and adaptability. In the context of climate change, evaluating the drought responses of different genotypes is critical for enhancing resilience and productivity. Genetic improvement often involves crossing fast-growing, high-quality species with drought-tolerant ones. Understanding trade-offs in pure species and hybrids is essential for optimizing forest management. This study examined physiologic and growth responses to water restriction (WR) of <i>E. grandis</i> (GG), <i>E. grandis</i> × <i>E. camaldulensis</i> (GC), <i>E. grandis</i> × <i>E. tereticornis</i> (GT), and <i>E. grandis</i> × <i>E. urophylla</i> (GU1 and GU2) clones at the sapling stage across two drought cycles. Measurements included leaf-water potential (Ψ), relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (<i>g</i><sub>S</sub>), pressure–volume traits, hydraulic conductivities (k<sub>S</sub>, k<sub>L</sub>), percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC), specific leaf area (SLA), and chlorophyll content. Results revealed different drought response strategies among clones. GC and GT hybrids were more “water spenders”, exhibiting high PLC (&gt; 80%) due to limited stomatal closure, along with higher chlorophyll levels that maximized carbon gain and growth under drought. GC exhibited both elastic and osmotic adjustment, while GT showed only elastic adjustment. GG was the most drought-sensitive clone, relying on strong stomatal control, osmotic adjustment, and low cavitation, which limited carbon assimilation and resulted in the greatest growth reduction. GU hybrids shared physiologic similarities with GG but showed varying growth responses to WR. These findings suggest some hybrid clones may outperform pure <i>E. grandis</i> under WR, with significant genotype variation even among hybrids sharing similar parental species.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-025-02609-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-025-02609-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大桉树、红树胶和尾叶桉树的杂种在应对长期干旱方面表现出不同的策略,包括气孔调节、植物水力和生长方面的差异。摘要桉树因其生长迅速、适应性强而在商业林业中占有重要地位。在气候变化背景下,评估不同基因型的干旱响应对于提高抗灾能力和生产力至关重要。遗传改良通常包括将快速生长的优质品种与耐旱品种杂交。了解纯种和杂交种之间的权衡对优化森林管理至关重要。本研究考察了大叶黄(GG)、大叶黄(xe)对水分限制(WR)的生理和生长响应。camaldulensis (GC), E. grandis × E。tereticornis (GT)和E. grandis × E。两个干旱循环中尾叶(GU1和GU2)无性系幼树期的差异。测量包括叶片水势(Ψ)、相对含水量(RWC)、气孔导度(gS)、压力-体积特性、水力导度(kS、kL)、水力导度损失百分比(PLC)、比叶面积(SLA)和叶绿素含量。结果表明,不同无性系的干旱响应策略不同。GC和GT杂交种是更多的“水分消耗者”,由于气孔关闭有限,具有较高的PLC (> 80%),以及更高的叶绿素水平,从而最大限度地提高了干旱条件下的碳增益和生长。GC表现为弹性调节和渗透调节,而GT只表现为弹性调节。GG是最干旱敏感的无性系,依靠强大的气孔控制、渗透调节和低空化,限制了碳的同化,导致最大的生长减少。谷氨酸杂交种与谷氨酸杂交种具有生理上的相似性,但对WR的生长反应不同。这些发现表明,在WR条件下,一些杂交无性系的表现可能优于纯大田鸡,即使在具有相似亲本种的杂交无性系之间也存在显著的基因型差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Similar but unique: physiological response to drought and growth of pure species and interspecific hybrid clones of Eucalyptus

Similar but unique: physiological response to drought and growth of pure species and interspecific hybrid clones of Eucalyptus

Key message

Eucalyptus grandis and hybrids with red gums and E. urophylla exhibit different strategies to deal with long-term drought, involving differences in stomatal regulation, plant hydraulics, and growth.

Abstract

Eucalyptus species are important in commercial forestry for their rapid growth and adaptability. In the context of climate change, evaluating the drought responses of different genotypes is critical for enhancing resilience and productivity. Genetic improvement often involves crossing fast-growing, high-quality species with drought-tolerant ones. Understanding trade-offs in pure species and hybrids is essential for optimizing forest management. This study examined physiologic and growth responses to water restriction (WR) of E. grandis (GG), E. grandis × E. camaldulensis (GC), E. grandis × E. tereticornis (GT), and E. grandis × E. urophylla (GU1 and GU2) clones at the sapling stage across two drought cycles. Measurements included leaf-water potential (Ψ), relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gS), pressure–volume traits, hydraulic conductivities (kS, kL), percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC), specific leaf area (SLA), and chlorophyll content. Results revealed different drought response strategies among clones. GC and GT hybrids were more “water spenders”, exhibiting high PLC (> 80%) due to limited stomatal closure, along with higher chlorophyll levels that maximized carbon gain and growth under drought. GC exhibited both elastic and osmotic adjustment, while GT showed only elastic adjustment. GG was the most drought-sensitive clone, relying on strong stomatal control, osmotic adjustment, and low cavitation, which limited carbon assimilation and resulted in the greatest growth reduction. GU hybrids shared physiologic similarities with GG but showed varying growth responses to WR. These findings suggest some hybrid clones may outperform pure E. grandis under WR, with significant genotype variation even among hybrids sharing similar parental species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees
Trees 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Trees - Structure and Function publishes original articles on the physiology, biochemistry, functional anatomy, structure and ecology of trees and other woody plants. Also presented are articles concerned with pathology and technological problems, when they contribute to the basic understanding of structure and function of trees. In addition to original articles and short communications, the journal publishes reviews on selected topics concerning the structure and function of trees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信