北亚热带不同土地利用方式和深度下土壤酸化特征及定量分析

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Yue Dong , Samuel Adingo , Xiaodong Song , Shuai Liu , Yiting Hu , Jianwei Zhang , Lei Wang , Cheng Ji , Jidong Wang
{"title":"北亚热带不同土地利用方式和深度下土壤酸化特征及定量分析","authors":"Yue Dong ,&nbsp;Samuel Adingo ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Song ,&nbsp;Shuai Liu ,&nbsp;Yiting Hu ,&nbsp;Jianwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Cheng Ji ,&nbsp;Jidong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extensive nitrogen (N) fertilization and intensified agriculture have greatly accelerated soil acidification in China. However, research has focused more on non-calcareous soils with pH &lt; 6.5. Until now, knowledge concerning the characteristics and rate of acidification of calcareous soils in northern China is still lacking. In this study, soil samples (n = 139) under different land uses (upland, paddy fields, and forests) and at different soil depths (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm) were collected from a typical northern subtropical agricultural region. The characteristics and drivers of soil acidification were evaluated based on the measurable results and quantification of the proton (H<sup>+</sup>) budget. Compared to historical data (n = 143) from the 1980s, the pH of the topsoil was decreased by 2.88 and 1.88 units in upland and paddy fields, respectively. Meanwhile, due to the selective uptake of cations over anions by crops, subsoil pH in upland and paddy fields also reduced significantly by 1.30 and 1.12 units, respectively. In contrast, no significant change in the soil pH was observed in the forests. In the study area, the soil acidification rates were 17.7 ± 3.2 and 13.5 ± 2.7 kmol ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for upland and paddy fields, respectively. N transformation was the dominant driver of soil acidification (63–77 %), followed by excess uptake of cations by crops (23–37 %), whereas the contribution of H<sup>+</sup> deposition and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> process was negligible (&lt;1 %). Quantitative results showed that soil acidification was more severe in upland than in paddy fields, with a faster decline in soil pH, a higher soil exchangeable acidity, a greater proportion of strongly acidic soils, and a 30 % higher soil acidification rate. This might be interpreted by the differences in N fertilization rate, water management, topographical distribution, and crop yields. Thus, our data suggest that strategies such as reducing the N fertilization rate, implementing appropriate water management strategies, practicing crop rotation, and adequate straw return could effectively mitigate soil acidification in northern subtropical China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 106527"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and quantifications of soil acidification under different land uses and depths in northern subtropical China\",\"authors\":\"Yue Dong ,&nbsp;Samuel Adingo ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Song ,&nbsp;Shuai Liu ,&nbsp;Yiting Hu ,&nbsp;Jianwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Cheng Ji ,&nbsp;Jidong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Extensive nitrogen (N) fertilization and intensified agriculture have greatly accelerated soil acidification in China. However, research has focused more on non-calcareous soils with pH &lt; 6.5. Until now, knowledge concerning the characteristics and rate of acidification of calcareous soils in northern China is still lacking. In this study, soil samples (n = 139) under different land uses (upland, paddy fields, and forests) and at different soil depths (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm) were collected from a typical northern subtropical agricultural region. The characteristics and drivers of soil acidification were evaluated based on the measurable results and quantification of the proton (H<sup>+</sup>) budget. Compared to historical data (n = 143) from the 1980s, the pH of the topsoil was decreased by 2.88 and 1.88 units in upland and paddy fields, respectively. Meanwhile, due to the selective uptake of cations over anions by crops, subsoil pH in upland and paddy fields also reduced significantly by 1.30 and 1.12 units, respectively. In contrast, no significant change in the soil pH was observed in the forests. In the study area, the soil acidification rates were 17.7 ± 3.2 and 13.5 ± 2.7 kmol ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for upland and paddy fields, respectively. N transformation was the dominant driver of soil acidification (63–77 %), followed by excess uptake of cations by crops (23–37 %), whereas the contribution of H<sup>+</sup> deposition and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> process was negligible (&lt;1 %). Quantitative results showed that soil acidification was more severe in upland than in paddy fields, with a faster decline in soil pH, a higher soil exchangeable acidity, a greater proportion of strongly acidic soils, and a 30 % higher soil acidification rate. This might be interpreted by the differences in N fertilization rate, water management, topographical distribution, and crop yields. Thus, our data suggest that strategies such as reducing the N fertilization rate, implementing appropriate water management strategies, practicing crop rotation, and adequate straw return could effectively mitigate soil acidification in northern subtropical China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"250 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725000819\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725000819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广泛施用氮肥和集约化农业极大地加速了中国土壤酸化。然而,研究更多地集中在pH <; 6.5的非钙质土壤上。迄今为止,对中国北方钙质土壤的酸化特征和酸化速率还缺乏认识。本研究在典型的北亚热带农业区采集了不同土地利用方式(旱地、水田和森林)和不同土壤深度(0 ~ 20 cm、20 ~ 40 cm)下的土壤样品(n = 139)。基于可测结果和质子(H+)收支的量化,评价了土壤酸化的特征和驱动因素。与20世纪80年代以来的历史数据(n = 143)相比,旱地和水田的表层土壤pH值分别下降了2.88和1.88个单位。同时,由于作物对阳离子的选择性吸收,旱地和水田的底土pH值也分别显著降低了1.30和1.12个单位。相比之下,森林土壤pH值没有显著变化。研究区旱地和水田土壤酸化速率分别为17.7 ± 3.2和13.5 ± 2.7 kmol ha−1 yr−1。氮转化是土壤酸化的主要驱动因素(63-77 %),其次是作物对阳离子的过量吸收(23-37 %),而H+沉积和HCO3-过程的贡献可以忽略不计(<1 %)。定量结果表明,旱地土壤酸化比水田严重,土壤pH值下降更快,土壤交换性酸度更高,强酸性土壤比例更大,土壤酸化率高30 %。这可能与施氮量、水分管理、地形分布和作物产量的差异有关。因此,降低氮肥施用量、实施适当的水分管理策略、实行轮作和适当的秸秆还田等策略可以有效缓解中国北部亚热带土壤酸化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics and quantifications of soil acidification under different land uses and depths in northern subtropical China
Extensive nitrogen (N) fertilization and intensified agriculture have greatly accelerated soil acidification in China. However, research has focused more on non-calcareous soils with pH < 6.5. Until now, knowledge concerning the characteristics and rate of acidification of calcareous soils in northern China is still lacking. In this study, soil samples (n = 139) under different land uses (upland, paddy fields, and forests) and at different soil depths (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm) were collected from a typical northern subtropical agricultural region. The characteristics and drivers of soil acidification were evaluated based on the measurable results and quantification of the proton (H+) budget. Compared to historical data (n = 143) from the 1980s, the pH of the topsoil was decreased by 2.88 and 1.88 units in upland and paddy fields, respectively. Meanwhile, due to the selective uptake of cations over anions by crops, subsoil pH in upland and paddy fields also reduced significantly by 1.30 and 1.12 units, respectively. In contrast, no significant change in the soil pH was observed in the forests. In the study area, the soil acidification rates were 17.7 ± 3.2 and 13.5 ± 2.7 kmol ha−1 yr−1 for upland and paddy fields, respectively. N transformation was the dominant driver of soil acidification (63–77 %), followed by excess uptake of cations by crops (23–37 %), whereas the contribution of H+ deposition and HCO3- process was negligible (<1 %). Quantitative results showed that soil acidification was more severe in upland than in paddy fields, with a faster decline in soil pH, a higher soil exchangeable acidity, a greater proportion of strongly acidic soils, and a 30 % higher soil acidification rate. This might be interpreted by the differences in N fertilization rate, water management, topographical distribution, and crop yields. Thus, our data suggest that strategies such as reducing the N fertilization rate, implementing appropriate water management strategies, practicing crop rotation, and adequate straw return could effectively mitigate soil acidification in northern subtropical China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信