{"title":"非正规经济与能源效率:非洲国家的经验证据","authors":"Princewill Okwoche , Milan Ščasný , Amin Karimu","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pervasive informal economies can significantly hinder efforts to improve energy efficiency. This study investigates the complex relationship between informality and energy efficiency in African countries, focusing on linear, nonlinear, and asymmetric effects. The research aims to clarify how varying levels of informality affect energy efficiency and the intervening roles of foreign direct investment (FDI) and institutional quality. Employing a panel dataset of 46 African countries from 1990 to 2017, the study utilizes Stochastic Frontier Analysis to derive energy efficiency scores. It applies panel autoregressive distributed lag and the dynamic panel threshold models to assess the effects of informality. Findings from the linear model reveal that informality may have some initial beneficial effects on energy efficiency. Further evidence of nonlinearity is strongly supported, showing that informality may improve energy efficiency only up to a threshold of between 41 and 42 % of GDP, beyond which it becomes detrimental to its performance. Similarly, compelling evidence of asymmetric effects is reported: positive and negative shocks have increasing and decreasing effects on energy efficiency, respectively. Additional evidence indicates that FDI lowers energy efficiency, whereas governance quality is associated with improved energy efficiency. Lastly, FDI mitigates the negative effect of informality in line with the <em>halo effect</em>. These results reflect the heterogeneous effects of informality that have been reported by prior studies. Policy recommendations based on these findings are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 115518"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informal economies and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from African countries\",\"authors\":\"Princewill Okwoche , Milan Ščasný , Amin Karimu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pervasive informal economies can significantly hinder efforts to improve energy efficiency. This study investigates the complex relationship between informality and energy efficiency in African countries, focusing on linear, nonlinear, and asymmetric effects. The research aims to clarify how varying levels of informality affect energy efficiency and the intervening roles of foreign direct investment (FDI) and institutional quality. Employing a panel dataset of 46 African countries from 1990 to 2017, the study utilizes Stochastic Frontier Analysis to derive energy efficiency scores. It applies panel autoregressive distributed lag and the dynamic panel threshold models to assess the effects of informality. Findings from the linear model reveal that informality may have some initial beneficial effects on energy efficiency. Further evidence of nonlinearity is strongly supported, showing that informality may improve energy efficiency only up to a threshold of between 41 and 42 % of GDP, beyond which it becomes detrimental to its performance. Similarly, compelling evidence of asymmetric effects is reported: positive and negative shocks have increasing and decreasing effects on energy efficiency, respectively. Additional evidence indicates that FDI lowers energy efficiency, whereas governance quality is associated with improved energy efficiency. Lastly, FDI mitigates the negative effect of informality in line with the <em>halo effect</em>. These results reflect the heterogeneous effects of informality that have been reported by prior studies. Policy recommendations based on these findings are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001911\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001911","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Informal economies and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from African countries
Pervasive informal economies can significantly hinder efforts to improve energy efficiency. This study investigates the complex relationship between informality and energy efficiency in African countries, focusing on linear, nonlinear, and asymmetric effects. The research aims to clarify how varying levels of informality affect energy efficiency and the intervening roles of foreign direct investment (FDI) and institutional quality. Employing a panel dataset of 46 African countries from 1990 to 2017, the study utilizes Stochastic Frontier Analysis to derive energy efficiency scores. It applies panel autoregressive distributed lag and the dynamic panel threshold models to assess the effects of informality. Findings from the linear model reveal that informality may have some initial beneficial effects on energy efficiency. Further evidence of nonlinearity is strongly supported, showing that informality may improve energy efficiency only up to a threshold of between 41 and 42 % of GDP, beyond which it becomes detrimental to its performance. Similarly, compelling evidence of asymmetric effects is reported: positive and negative shocks have increasing and decreasing effects on energy efficiency, respectively. Additional evidence indicates that FDI lowers energy efficiency, whereas governance quality is associated with improved energy efficiency. Lastly, FDI mitigates the negative effect of informality in line with the halo effect. These results reflect the heterogeneous effects of informality that have been reported by prior studies. Policy recommendations based on these findings are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.