Danlu Guo , Anna Lintern , Alexander H. Elliott , Melanie E. Roberts , Susan M. Cuddy , Ulrike Bende-Michl , Baihua Fu , Klaus Joehnk , Robert Sargent , Danswell Starrs , Anthony J. Jakeman , Vaughn Grey , Matt S. Gibbs , Deniz Özkundakci , Val Snow , Thomas Stephens , Theodore Kpodonu , Andrew W. Western
{"title":"对澳大利亚和新西兰社区主导的水质建模战略方向的评论","authors":"Danlu Guo , Anna Lintern , Alexander H. Elliott , Melanie E. Roberts , Susan M. Cuddy , Ulrike Bende-Michl , Baihua Fu , Klaus Joehnk , Robert Sargent , Danswell Starrs , Anthony J. Jakeman , Vaughn Grey , Matt S. Gibbs , Deniz Özkundakci , Val Snow , Thomas Stephens , Theodore Kpodonu , Andrew W. Western","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water quality is essential for human and ecosystem health. In Australia and New Zealand, modelling of water quality is crucial for characterising and managing water resources and providing support for planning and regulation, yet current modelling practice does not meet these needs fully. This calls for re-thinking strategies and priorities for water quality modelling that include the broader modelling community (which encompasses practitioners, land–water managers who use model results, and those who collect data). There is little precedent of collaborative strategy development involving a broader modelling community. We therefore undertook a new initiative to develop long-term collaborative strategies and priorities for modelling water quality for Australia and New Zealand. Key findings from this process are presented in this commentary paper. Specifically, we convened a group of water quality modellers from different sectors (government, consulting, and academia) to collaboratively identify the current status and challenges, future visions and potential strategic areas of water quality modelling. Actions are proposed in the key areas of: making a stronger case for water quality modelling; community building; making data and models more available and accessible; and leveraging new and emerging technologies for data collection and modelling. Our process and findings are likely to resonate with modellers facing similar strategic challenges globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"656 ","pages":"Article 132978"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A commentary on strategic community-led directions for water quality modelling in Australia and New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Danlu Guo , Anna Lintern , Alexander H. Elliott , Melanie E. Roberts , Susan M. Cuddy , Ulrike Bende-Michl , Baihua Fu , Klaus Joehnk , Robert Sargent , Danswell Starrs , Anthony J. Jakeman , Vaughn Grey , Matt S. Gibbs , Deniz Özkundakci , Val Snow , Thomas Stephens , Theodore Kpodonu , Andrew W. Western\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Water quality is essential for human and ecosystem health. In Australia and New Zealand, modelling of water quality is crucial for characterising and managing water resources and providing support for planning and regulation, yet current modelling practice does not meet these needs fully. This calls for re-thinking strategies and priorities for water quality modelling that include the broader modelling community (which encompasses practitioners, land–water managers who use model results, and those who collect data). There is little precedent of collaborative strategy development involving a broader modelling community. We therefore undertook a new initiative to develop long-term collaborative strategies and priorities for modelling water quality for Australia and New Zealand. Key findings from this process are presented in this commentary paper. Specifically, we convened a group of water quality modellers from different sectors (government, consulting, and academia) to collaboratively identify the current status and challenges, future visions and potential strategic areas of water quality modelling. Actions are proposed in the key areas of: making a stronger case for water quality modelling; community building; making data and models more available and accessible; and leveraging new and emerging technologies for data collection and modelling. Our process and findings are likely to resonate with modellers facing similar strategic challenges globally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"656 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003166\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A commentary on strategic community-led directions for water quality modelling in Australia and New Zealand
Water quality is essential for human and ecosystem health. In Australia and New Zealand, modelling of water quality is crucial for characterising and managing water resources and providing support for planning and regulation, yet current modelling practice does not meet these needs fully. This calls for re-thinking strategies and priorities for water quality modelling that include the broader modelling community (which encompasses practitioners, land–water managers who use model results, and those who collect data). There is little precedent of collaborative strategy development involving a broader modelling community. We therefore undertook a new initiative to develop long-term collaborative strategies and priorities for modelling water quality for Australia and New Zealand. Key findings from this process are presented in this commentary paper. Specifically, we convened a group of water quality modellers from different sectors (government, consulting, and academia) to collaboratively identify the current status and challenges, future visions and potential strategic areas of water quality modelling. Actions are proposed in the key areas of: making a stronger case for water quality modelling; community building; making data and models more available and accessible; and leveraging new and emerging technologies for data collection and modelling. Our process and findings are likely to resonate with modellers facing similar strategic challenges globally.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.