{"title":"Exercise Strategy for Reducing Visceral Adipose Tissue in Community Residents With Obesity: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial.","authors":"Yu-Hsuan Chang, Yun-Hsiang Lee, Kay Lh Wu, Wei-Li Hsu, Hung Hung, Shiow-Ching Shun","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is the most effective method of reducing visceral adipose tissue (VAT). However, the optimal exercise modality and strategy for reducing VAT have yet to be determined.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to identify the optimal sequence exercise strategy for reducing VAT in community residents with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design was used to conduct a two-stage (8 weeks each) adaptive exercise for 40- to 64-year-old residents with obesity. In the first stage, the participants were randomly allocated into two groups, one of which did 30 minutes of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 58) and the other which did 20 minutes of high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 58) three times per week. In the second stage, the nonresponders (with VAT decreases < 3%) were randomly reallocated into a group that performed MICT combined with an additional 10 minutes of resistance exercise or one that performed the opposite of the first-stage treatment (HIIT or MICT). Those who responded to the first-stage intervention (with VAT decreases of ≥ 3%) continued the same exercise treatment until 16 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MICT intervention was found to be more efficacious than the HIIT intervention in reducing VAT during the first 8 weeks (β = -4.10, p = .029). Among the nonresponders to MICT, the HIIT outperformed MICT combined with resistance exercise as the alternative choice in the second stage (β = -7.36, p = .006). On the contrary, there were no significant differences between MICT and MICT combined with resistance exercise for the nonresponders to HIIT (β = 1.34, p = .626). Those participants who repeated the same exercise modality (either MICT or HIIT) in both stages exhibited superior VAT reduction to those who changed exercise modalities after the first stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The optimal sequence exercise strategy for reducing VAT is captured by a two-stage sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design. Community residents with obesity are advised to reduce VAT efficiently through participation in an 8-week MICT program. For those preferring HIIT rather than MICT, a 16-week program without changing the modality midway is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":94242,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","volume":" ","pages":"e385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exercise Strategy for Reducing Visceral Adipose Tissue in Community Residents With Obesity: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial.
Background: Exercise is the most effective method of reducing visceral adipose tissue (VAT). However, the optimal exercise modality and strategy for reducing VAT have yet to be determined.
Purpose: This study was designed to identify the optimal sequence exercise strategy for reducing VAT in community residents with obesity.
Methods: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design was used to conduct a two-stage (8 weeks each) adaptive exercise for 40- to 64-year-old residents with obesity. In the first stage, the participants were randomly allocated into two groups, one of which did 30 minutes of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT; n = 58) and the other which did 20 minutes of high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 58) three times per week. In the second stage, the nonresponders (with VAT decreases < 3%) were randomly reallocated into a group that performed MICT combined with an additional 10 minutes of resistance exercise or one that performed the opposite of the first-stage treatment (HIIT or MICT). Those who responded to the first-stage intervention (with VAT decreases of ≥ 3%) continued the same exercise treatment until 16 weeks.
Results: The MICT intervention was found to be more efficacious than the HIIT intervention in reducing VAT during the first 8 weeks (β = -4.10, p = .029). Among the nonresponders to MICT, the HIIT outperformed MICT combined with resistance exercise as the alternative choice in the second stage (β = -7.36, p = .006). On the contrary, there were no significant differences between MICT and MICT combined with resistance exercise for the nonresponders to HIIT (β = 1.34, p = .626). Those participants who repeated the same exercise modality (either MICT or HIIT) in both stages exhibited superior VAT reduction to those who changed exercise modalities after the first stage.
Conclusions/implications for practice: The optimal sequence exercise strategy for reducing VAT is captured by a two-stage sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design. Community residents with obesity are advised to reduce VAT efficiently through participation in an 8-week MICT program. For those preferring HIIT rather than MICT, a 16-week program without changing the modality midway is recommended.