Davi Lavareda Corrêa, Flávia M Flório, Vânia Castro Corrêa, Suelen Lavareda Corrêa, Sue A Lavareda Corrêa Uchôa, Cecilia Pedroso Turssi
{"title":"ICDA-S-II指数改善了巴西北部学童中龋齿病变的早期诊断。","authors":"Davi Lavareda Corrêa, Flávia M Flório, Vânia Castro Corrêa, Suelen Lavareda Corrêa, Sue A Lavareda Corrêa Uchôa, Cecilia Pedroso Turssi","doi":"10.54589/aol.37/3/217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index is widely used for detecting carious lesions, primarily focusing on established cavities, while the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDA-S-II) is designed to identify incipient lesions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the DMFT index compared to the ICDA-S-II criteria designed for early-stage carious lesion diagnosis in schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil).</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A cohort of 107 twelve-year-old schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil) underwent dental examinations by three calibrated examiners using the DMFT and ICDA-S-II indices. The ICDA-SII assessment involved prophylaxis, relative isolation, and a standardized drying period. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, chi-squared and G tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed among examiners for either the DMFT (p = 0.699) or the ICDA-S-II (p = 1.000) indices. Gender did not influence results (DMFT: p = 0.697; ICDA-S-II: p = 0.310). Caries-free prevalence differed significantly, at 32% according to DMFT and 2.8% according to ICDA-S-II (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DMFT index consistently underestimated carious lesions, whereas the ICDA-SII index enhanced the identification of incipient potentially reversible lesions. DMFT and ICDAS-II indices have demonstrated their efficacy in cavity detection, with the most significant distinction arising in ICDAS-II in the identification of early-stage carious lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93853,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":"37 3","pages":"217-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICDA-S-II index improves early-stage diagnosis of carious lesions among schoolchildren in northern Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Davi Lavareda Corrêa, Flávia M Flório, Vânia Castro Corrêa, Suelen Lavareda Corrêa, Sue A Lavareda Corrêa Uchôa, Cecilia Pedroso Turssi\",\"doi\":\"10.54589/aol.37/3/217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index is widely used for detecting carious lesions, primarily focusing on established cavities, while the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDA-S-II) is designed to identify incipient lesions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the DMFT index compared to the ICDA-S-II criteria designed for early-stage carious lesion diagnosis in schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil).</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A cohort of 107 twelve-year-old schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil) underwent dental examinations by three calibrated examiners using the DMFT and ICDA-S-II indices. The ICDA-SII assessment involved prophylaxis, relative isolation, and a standardized drying period. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, chi-squared and G tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed among examiners for either the DMFT (p = 0.699) or the ICDA-S-II (p = 1.000) indices. Gender did not influence results (DMFT: p = 0.697; ICDA-S-II: p = 0.310). Caries-free prevalence differed significantly, at 32% according to DMFT and 2.8% according to ICDA-S-II (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DMFT index consistently underestimated carious lesions, whereas the ICDA-SII index enhanced the identification of incipient potentially reversible lesions. DMFT and ICDAS-II indices have demonstrated their efficacy in cavity detection, with the most significant distinction arising in ICDAS-II in the identification of early-stage carious lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"217-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.37/3/217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.37/3/217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
龋缺补牙(DMFT)指数被广泛用于检测龋齿,主要关注已建立的龋齿,而国际龋齿检测和评估系统(ICDA-S-II)旨在识别早期病变。目的:本横断面研究的目的是评估DMFT指数与ICDA-S-II标准的诊断效果,ICDA-S-II标准设计用于诊断bel姆(巴西)学童的早期龋齿病变。材料和方法:对107名来自巴西bel姆的12岁学龄儿童进行了牙科检查,由三名校准的检查员使用DMFT和ICDA-S-II指数进行了牙齿检查。ICDA-SII评估包括预防、相对隔离和标准化干燥期。统计分析包括方差分析、卡方检验和G检验。结果:检查者在DMFT (p = 0.699)和ICDA-S-II (p = 1.000)指标上均无统计学差异。性别对结果无影响(DMFT: p = 0.697;ICDA-S-II: p = 0.310)。无龋患病率差异显著,DMFT为32%,ICDA-S-II为2.8%(结论:DMFT指数始终低估了龋齿病变,而ICDA-SII指数增强了对早期潜在可逆病变的识别。DMFT和ICDAS-II指标在检测空腔方面已经证明了它们的有效性,其中ICDAS-II在早期龋齿病变的识别方面的区别最为显著。
ICDA-S-II index improves early-stage diagnosis of carious lesions among schoolchildren in northern Brazil.
The Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index is widely used for detecting carious lesions, primarily focusing on established cavities, while the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDA-S-II) is designed to identify incipient lesions.
Aim: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the DMFT index compared to the ICDA-S-II criteria designed for early-stage carious lesion diagnosis in schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil).
Materials and method: A cohort of 107 twelve-year-old schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil) underwent dental examinations by three calibrated examiners using the DMFT and ICDA-S-II indices. The ICDA-SII assessment involved prophylaxis, relative isolation, and a standardized drying period. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, chi-squared and G tests.
Results: No statistically significant differences were observed among examiners for either the DMFT (p = 0.699) or the ICDA-S-II (p = 1.000) indices. Gender did not influence results (DMFT: p = 0.697; ICDA-S-II: p = 0.310). Caries-free prevalence differed significantly, at 32% according to DMFT and 2.8% according to ICDA-S-II (p<0.001).
Conclusions: The DMFT index consistently underestimated carious lesions, whereas the ICDA-SII index enhanced the identification of incipient potentially reversible lesions. DMFT and ICDAS-II indices have demonstrated their efficacy in cavity detection, with the most significant distinction arising in ICDAS-II in the identification of early-stage carious lesions.