预测局部组织在腭裂复发修复中的可行性:一种新的评分系统。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Seyda Guray, Uğur Kaan Kalem
{"title":"预测局部组织在腭裂复发修复中的可行性:一种新的评分系统。","authors":"Seyda Guray, Uğur Kaan Kalem","doi":"10.1177/10556656251323043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of structural changes from repeated failed surgeries on outcomes and develop a scoring system to evaluate local palatal tissue usability in recurrent fistula repairs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study of 51 patients with prior failed fistula surgeries using a novel scoring system for palatal tissue evaluation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at a tertiary care center for craniofacial surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>51 patients with recurrent palatal fistulas and at least 1prior failed surgery were included. Standardized preoperative photographs were taken.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients underwent palatal fistula repair. Outcomes were assessed 12 months postoperatively, and patients were grouped by success. Two surgeons applied the scoring system to assess scar condition (evaluated by color), rugae presence, remnant flap (RF), and number of failed surgeries (NFSs).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The primary measure was the correlation between scoring system criteria and surgical outcomes, with statistical analysis determining predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All criteria correlated with NFS and recurrence (<i>P</i> < 0.001), but only rugae, RF, and NFS showed strong associations with recurrence. Scar condition evaluated by color had lower correlations with rugae (<i>r</i> = 0.461), RF (<i>r</i> = 0.458), and NFS (<i>r</i> = 0.239). The final scoring system was simplified to 3 variables: rugae, RF, and NFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The revised scoring system effectively predicts success in recurrent palatal fistula repairs. Scores above 2 indicate a high risk of recurrence, suggesting alternative approaches when using local tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251323043"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the Feasibility of Local Tissues in Recurrent Palate Fistula Repair: A New Scoring System.\",\"authors\":\"Seyda Guray, Uğur Kaan Kalem\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656251323043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of structural changes from repeated failed surgeries on outcomes and develop a scoring system to evaluate local palatal tissue usability in recurrent fistula repairs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study of 51 patients with prior failed fistula surgeries using a novel scoring system for palatal tissue evaluation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at a tertiary care center for craniofacial surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>51 patients with recurrent palatal fistulas and at least 1prior failed surgery were included. Standardized preoperative photographs were taken.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients underwent palatal fistula repair. Outcomes were assessed 12 months postoperatively, and patients were grouped by success. Two surgeons applied the scoring system to assess scar condition (evaluated by color), rugae presence, remnant flap (RF), and number of failed surgeries (NFSs).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The primary measure was the correlation between scoring system criteria and surgical outcomes, with statistical analysis determining predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All criteria correlated with NFS and recurrence (<i>P</i> < 0.001), but only rugae, RF, and NFS showed strong associations with recurrence. Scar condition evaluated by color had lower correlations with rugae (<i>r</i> = 0.461), RF (<i>r</i> = 0.458), and NFS (<i>r</i> = 0.239). The final scoring system was simplified to 3 variables: rugae, RF, and NFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The revised scoring system effectively predicts success in recurrent palatal fistula repairs. Scores above 2 indicate a high risk of recurrence, suggesting alternative approaches when using local tissues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656251323043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251323043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251323043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估反复手术失败导致的结构改变对结果的影响,并建立一个评分系统来评估局部腭组织在复发性瘘修复中的可用性。设计:回顾性研究51例既往瘘管手术失败的患者,使用一种新的腭组织评估评分系统。环境:本研究在颅面外科三级护理中心进行。患者,参与者:51例复发性腭瘘患者,既往至少1例手术失败。术前拍摄标准化照片。干预措施:患者行腭瘘修补术。术后12个月评估结果,并按成功程度分组。两名外科医生应用评分系统评估疤痕状况(以颜色评估)、皱褶存在、残余皮瓣(RF)和手术失败次数(NFSs)。主要观察指标:主要观察评分系统标准与手术结果的相关性,通过统计分析确定预测价值。结果:所有标准与NFS和复发相关(P < 0.001),但只有rugae、RF和NFS与复发有很强的相关性。以颜色评价疤痕状况与rugae (r = 0.461)、RF (r = 0.458)和NFS (r = 0.239)的相关性较低。最终的评分系统被简化为3个变量:rugae、RF和NFS。结论:修订后的评分系统可有效预测复发性腭瘘修复的成功率。评分超过2分表明复发风险高,建议使用局部组织时选择其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting the Feasibility of Local Tissues in Recurrent Palate Fistula Repair: A New Scoring System.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of structural changes from repeated failed surgeries on outcomes and develop a scoring system to evaluate local palatal tissue usability in recurrent fistula repairs.

Design: A retrospective study of 51 patients with prior failed fistula surgeries using a novel scoring system for palatal tissue evaluation.

Setting: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center for craniofacial surgery.

Patients, participants: 51 patients with recurrent palatal fistulas and at least 1prior failed surgery were included. Standardized preoperative photographs were taken.

Interventions: Patients underwent palatal fistula repair. Outcomes were assessed 12 months postoperatively, and patients were grouped by success. Two surgeons applied the scoring system to assess scar condition (evaluated by color), rugae presence, remnant flap (RF), and number of failed surgeries (NFSs).

Main outcome measure(s): The primary measure was the correlation between scoring system criteria and surgical outcomes, with statistical analysis determining predictive value.

Results: All criteria correlated with NFS and recurrence (P < 0.001), but only rugae, RF, and NFS showed strong associations with recurrence. Scar condition evaluated by color had lower correlations with rugae (r = 0.461), RF (r = 0.458), and NFS (r = 0.239). The final scoring system was simplified to 3 variables: rugae, RF, and NFS.

Conclusions: The revised scoring system effectively predicts success in recurrent palatal fistula repairs. Scores above 2 indicate a high risk of recurrence, suggesting alternative approaches when using local tissues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信