为数字健康干预设计混合效果-实施试验的框架。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Theresa E. Matson PhD, MPH , Eric D.A. Hermes MD , Aaron R. Lyon PhD , Andrew Quanbeck PhD , Stephen M. Schueller PhD , Sarah M. Wilson PhD , Joseph E. Glass PhD, MSW
{"title":"为数字健康干预设计混合效果-实施试验的框架。","authors":"Theresa E. Matson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Eric D.A. Hermes MD ,&nbsp;Aaron R. Lyon PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew Quanbeck PhD ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Schueller PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Wilson PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph E. Glass PhD, MSW","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article proposes methods for designing randomized controlled trials studying the implementation and effectiveness of digital interventions, meaning websites or applications (\"apps\") that patients use in healthcare. Deploying digital interventions for behavioral health differs from implementing traditional interventions such as medications or human-delivered therapy. Prior trial design guidance has ignored the existence of international governmental evidence standards, has paid insufficient attention to implementation reporting guidelines, and has not described methods for empirically testing the approach for organizing the delivery of digital interventions. This framework for designing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials of digital behavioral health interventions helps researchers articulate research questions that matter to decision-makers and meaningfully contribute to implementation. The framework outlines three phases: 1) frame effectiveness and implementation questions in terms of the digital intervention components, types of clinical support for the digital intervention, and specific strategies for implementing the digital intervention; 2) define and delineate actors, activities, action targets, dose, temporality, and outcomes to maximize inference and reproducibility; and 3) specify trial design features used for hybrid classification. We illustrate the utility of this framework with two effectiveness-implementation studies of digital interventions for substance use. This framework can help researchers decide on appropriate methodology and help decision-makers apply findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 35-47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for designing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials for digital health interventions\",\"authors\":\"Theresa E. Matson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Eric D.A. Hermes MD ,&nbsp;Aaron R. Lyon PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew Quanbeck PhD ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Schueller PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Wilson PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph E. Glass PhD, MSW\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article proposes methods for designing randomized controlled trials studying the implementation and effectiveness of digital interventions, meaning websites or applications (\\\"apps\\\") that patients use in healthcare. Deploying digital interventions for behavioral health differs from implementing traditional interventions such as medications or human-delivered therapy. Prior trial design guidance has ignored the existence of international governmental evidence standards, has paid insufficient attention to implementation reporting guidelines, and has not described methods for empirically testing the approach for organizing the delivery of digital interventions. This framework for designing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials of digital behavioral health interventions helps researchers articulate research questions that matter to decision-makers and meaningfully contribute to implementation. The framework outlines three phases: 1) frame effectiveness and implementation questions in terms of the digital intervention components, types of clinical support for the digital intervention, and specific strategies for implementing the digital intervention; 2) define and delineate actors, activities, action targets, dose, temporality, and outcomes to maximize inference and reproducibility; and 3) specify trial design features used for hybrid classification. We illustrate the utility of this framework with two effectiveness-implementation studies of digital interventions for substance use. This framework can help researchers decide on appropriate methodology and help decision-makers apply findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 35-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104727972500033X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104727972500033X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了设计随机对照试验的方法,以研究数字干预措施(即患者在医疗保健中使用的网站或应用程序("App"))的实施情况和有效性。针对行为健康采取数字化干预措施不同于药物或人工治疗等传统干预措施。之前的试验设计指南忽视了国际政府证据标准的存在,对实施报告指南关注不够,也没有描述对组织实施数字干预的方法进行实证测试的方法。本框架用于设计数字行为健康干预的有效性-实施性混合试验,帮助研究人员明确提出与决策者息息相关的研究问题,并为实施工作做出有意义的贡献。该框架概述了三个阶段:1)根据数字干预的组成部分、数字干预的临床支持类型以及实施数字干预的具体策略来确定有效性和实施问题;2)定义和划分参与者、活动、行动目标、剂量、时间性和结果,以最大限度地提高推论和可重复性;3)明确用于混合分类的试验设计特征。我们通过两项针对药物使用的数字化干预措施的有效性实施研究来说明这一框架的实用性。该框架可帮助研究人员决定适当的方法,并帮助决策者应用研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A framework for designing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials for digital health interventions
This article proposes methods for designing randomized controlled trials studying the implementation and effectiveness of digital interventions, meaning websites or applications ("apps") that patients use in healthcare. Deploying digital interventions for behavioral health differs from implementing traditional interventions such as medications or human-delivered therapy. Prior trial design guidance has ignored the existence of international governmental evidence standards, has paid insufficient attention to implementation reporting guidelines, and has not described methods for empirically testing the approach for organizing the delivery of digital interventions. This framework for designing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials of digital behavioral health interventions helps researchers articulate research questions that matter to decision-makers and meaningfully contribute to implementation. The framework outlines three phases: 1) frame effectiveness and implementation questions in terms of the digital intervention components, types of clinical support for the digital intervention, and specific strategies for implementing the digital intervention; 2) define and delineate actors, activities, action targets, dose, temporality, and outcomes to maximize inference and reproducibility; and 3) specify trial design features used for hybrid classification. We illustrate the utility of this framework with two effectiveness-implementation studies of digital interventions for substance use. This framework can help researchers decide on appropriate methodology and help decision-makers apply findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信