严重精神疾病患者获得性健康和生殖健康服务的障碍和促进因素:系统审查。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Matilda Brown, Emma Tassie, Sophie Carlisle, Elana Covshoff, Amy Ronaldson, Julie Williams, Shubulade Smith, Kylee Trevillion, Elizabeth Hughes, Margaret Heslin
{"title":"严重精神疾病患者获得性健康和生殖健康服务的障碍和促进因素:系统审查。","authors":"Matilda Brown, Emma Tassie, Sophie Carlisle, Elana Covshoff, Amy Ronaldson, Julie Williams, Shubulade Smith, Kylee Trevillion, Elizabeth Hughes, Margaret Heslin","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02844-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite increased prevalence of sexual and reproductive health problems among people with severe mental illness (SMI), uptake of sexual and reproductive healthcare in this group is poor. The reasons for this are unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to accessing sexual and reproductive health services from a service user perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases were searched using key words for \"sexual health\" and \"SMI\". Data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used to assess quality of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were included and underwent a narrative synthesis. They were on access to HIV care (n2), access to family planning methods (n2) and access to general sexual healthcare (n1). Barriers relating to HIV care included cost; barriers relating to family planning included lack of awareness and not considering the issue; barriers to general sexual healthcare included psychotic symptoms, mental health prioritisation, stigma, lack of sexual health focus in mental health programs, difficulty initiating conversations, knowledge, culture/religion/ethnicity, and finances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Studies which examined access to HIV and family planning services did so in a way that limited participant responses. While only one study examined barriers and facilitators to accessing generic sexual health services, it did so robustly, although it focussed solely on young women and provided limited data on facilitators. Future work should focus on examining barriers, and facilitators, to accessing sexual healthcare in all people with SMI to better identify and address these challenges. PROSPERO ID CRD42023414740.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to accessing sexual and reproductive health services for people with severe mental illness: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Matilda Brown, Emma Tassie, Sophie Carlisle, Elana Covshoff, Amy Ronaldson, Julie Williams, Shubulade Smith, Kylee Trevillion, Elizabeth Hughes, Margaret Heslin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02844-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite increased prevalence of sexual and reproductive health problems among people with severe mental illness (SMI), uptake of sexual and reproductive healthcare in this group is poor. The reasons for this are unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to accessing sexual and reproductive health services from a service user perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases were searched using key words for \\\"sexual health\\\" and \\\"SMI\\\". Data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used to assess quality of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were included and underwent a narrative synthesis. They were on access to HIV care (n2), access to family planning methods (n2) and access to general sexual healthcare (n1). Barriers relating to HIV care included cost; barriers relating to family planning included lack of awareness and not considering the issue; barriers to general sexual healthcare included psychotic symptoms, mental health prioritisation, stigma, lack of sexual health focus in mental health programs, difficulty initiating conversations, knowledge, culture/religion/ethnicity, and finances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Studies which examined access to HIV and family planning services did so in a way that limited participant responses. While only one study examined barriers and facilitators to accessing generic sexual health services, it did so robustly, although it focussed solely on young women and provided limited data on facilitators. Future work should focus on examining barriers, and facilitators, to accessing sexual healthcare in all people with SMI to better identify and address these challenges. PROSPERO ID CRD42023414740.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02844-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02844-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的性和生殖健康问题日益普遍,但这一群体对性和生殖保健的了解却很差。其原因尚不清楚。因此,本次审查旨在从服务使用者的角度确定获得性健康和生殖健康服务的障碍和促进因素。方法:以“性健康”和“SMI”为关键词检索3个电子数据库。数据由两名独立审稿人筛选和提取。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。结果:纳入5项研究并进行叙事综合。她们的问题是获得艾滋病毒护理(n2)、获得计划生育方法(n2)和获得一般性保健(n1)。与艾滋病毒护理有关的障碍包括费用;与计划生育有关的障碍包括缺乏认识和不考虑这个问题;一般性保健的障碍包括精神病症状、心理健康优先、耻辱、心理健康项目缺乏对性健康的关注、难以发起对话、知识、文化/宗教/种族和财政。结论:审查获得艾滋病毒和计划生育服务的研究在某种程度上限制了参与者的反应。虽然只有一项研究审查了获得一般性健康服务的障碍和促进因素,但它做得很好,尽管它只关注年轻妇女,并提供了有限的促进因素数据。未来的工作应侧重于检查所有重度精神障碍患者获得性保健的障碍和促进因素,以更好地识别和应对这些挑战。普洛斯彼罗id crd42023414740。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to accessing sexual and reproductive health services for people with severe mental illness: a systematic review.

Purpose: Despite increased prevalence of sexual and reproductive health problems among people with severe mental illness (SMI), uptake of sexual and reproductive healthcare in this group is poor. The reasons for this are unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to accessing sexual and reproductive health services from a service user perspective.

Methods: Three electronic databases were searched using key words for "sexual health" and "SMI". Data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used to assess quality of included studies.

Results: Five studies were included and underwent a narrative synthesis. They were on access to HIV care (n2), access to family planning methods (n2) and access to general sexual healthcare (n1). Barriers relating to HIV care included cost; barriers relating to family planning included lack of awareness and not considering the issue; barriers to general sexual healthcare included psychotic symptoms, mental health prioritisation, stigma, lack of sexual health focus in mental health programs, difficulty initiating conversations, knowledge, culture/religion/ethnicity, and finances.

Conclusions: Studies which examined access to HIV and family planning services did so in a way that limited participant responses. While only one study examined barriers and facilitators to accessing generic sexual health services, it did so robustly, although it focussed solely on young women and provided limited data on facilitators. Future work should focus on examining barriers, and facilitators, to accessing sexual healthcare in all people with SMI to better identify and address these challenges. PROSPERO ID CRD42023414740.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信