Daniela Roschütz, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Nikolaus von Dercks
{"title":"[泌尿科门诊护理-经济影响评估]。","authors":"Daniela Roschütz, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Nikolaus von Dercks","doi":"10.1007/s00120-025-02552-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expansion of the AOP (ambulatory operation procedure) catalog according to § 115 b SGB V in the years 2023 and 2024, as well as the introduction of hybrid-DRGs (disease-related groups) according to § 115 f SGB V, poses significant planning challenges for clinics. These regulatory changes are accompanied by significant financial uncertainties for clinics, thus, necessitating careful planning. The need to treat patients in an outpatient setting forces hospitals to adjust their operational processes. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact on revenue in the urology department of a maximum care provider.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data selection is made from the entire dataset of the urology department from the year 2023, including all procedures from the AOP catalog, applying context verification. From this, three risk groups (RG) are formed: 1) all cases that remain after context verification but still contain other procedures than only AOP procedures, 2) cases that contain only AOP procedures, and 3) a RG of the hybrid-DRG. An analysis of individual epidemiological parameters and a cost simulation were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RG 1, with a share of 28.1% of the total number of cases, shows the greatest risk with 701 cases amounting to € 1,742,819 when treated in an outpatient setting. With 3.8%, RG 2 results in a significantly lower risk on revenue with 91 cases amounting to € 161,479 or € 106,071 after the cost-revenue simulation. RG 3 of the hybrid-DRG represents the lowest revenue risk with 24 cases amounting to € 10,880. The cost simulation shows a negative result for RG 3 accounting to € 18,925.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transferring inpatient operations of urological patients to outpatient treatment is associated with a decline in revenue in urology. RG 2 and 3 show certainly calculable declines in revenue. Hospitals must analyze the loss of revenue and develop solution strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"462-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Outpatient care in urology-an economic impact assessment].\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Roschütz, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Nikolaus von Dercks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00120-025-02552-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expansion of the AOP (ambulatory operation procedure) catalog according to § 115 b SGB V in the years 2023 and 2024, as well as the introduction of hybrid-DRGs (disease-related groups) according to § 115 f SGB V, poses significant planning challenges for clinics. These regulatory changes are accompanied by significant financial uncertainties for clinics, thus, necessitating careful planning. The need to treat patients in an outpatient setting forces hospitals to adjust their operational processes. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact on revenue in the urology department of a maximum care provider.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data selection is made from the entire dataset of the urology department from the year 2023, including all procedures from the AOP catalog, applying context verification. From this, three risk groups (RG) are formed: 1) all cases that remain after context verification but still contain other procedures than only AOP procedures, 2) cases that contain only AOP procedures, and 3) a RG of the hybrid-DRG. An analysis of individual epidemiological parameters and a cost simulation were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RG 1, with a share of 28.1% of the total number of cases, shows the greatest risk with 701 cases amounting to € 1,742,819 when treated in an outpatient setting. With 3.8%, RG 2 results in a significantly lower risk on revenue with 91 cases amounting to € 161,479 or € 106,071 after the cost-revenue simulation. RG 3 of the hybrid-DRG represents the lowest revenue risk with 24 cases amounting to € 10,880. The cost simulation shows a negative result for RG 3 accounting to € 18,925.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transferring inpatient operations of urological patients to outpatient treatment is associated with a decline in revenue in urology. RG 2 and 3 show certainly calculable declines in revenue. Hospitals must analyze the loss of revenue and develop solution strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"462-468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02552-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02552-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:根据§115 b SGB V在2023年和2024年扩展AOP(门诊手术程序)目录,以及根据§115 f SGB V引入混合drgs(疾病相关组),对诊所的规划提出了重大挑战。这些监管变化伴随着诊所重大的财务不确定性,因此,需要仔细规划。在门诊治疗病人的需要迫使医院调整其操作流程。本研究的目的是分析对收入的影响在泌尿科的最大护理提供者。方法:数据选择自2023年以来泌尿科的整个数据集,包括AOP目录中的所有程序,应用上下文验证。由此,形成了三个风险组(RG): 1)在上下文验证之后仍然存在但仍然包含除AOP过程之外的其他过程的所有情况,2)仅包含AOP过程的情况,以及3)混合drg的RG。进行了个体流行病学参数分析和成本模拟。结果:rg1占病例总数的28.1%,在门诊治疗时显示出最大的风险,有701例,总计€ 1,742,819。在成本收益模拟后,rg2的收益风险显著降低,为91个案例,分别为 161,479欧元和 106,071欧元。混合drg的rg3的收入风险最低,有24起案件,共计 10,880欧元。成本模拟显示rg3的负结果为 18,925欧元。结论:泌尿外科住院病人转门诊治疗与泌尿外科收入下降有关。rg2和rg3的收益明显下降。医院必须分析收入损失并制定解决策略。
[Outpatient care in urology-an economic impact assessment].
Background: The expansion of the AOP (ambulatory operation procedure) catalog according to § 115 b SGB V in the years 2023 and 2024, as well as the introduction of hybrid-DRGs (disease-related groups) according to § 115 f SGB V, poses significant planning challenges for clinics. These regulatory changes are accompanied by significant financial uncertainties for clinics, thus, necessitating careful planning. The need to treat patients in an outpatient setting forces hospitals to adjust their operational processes. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact on revenue in the urology department of a maximum care provider.
Methods: Data selection is made from the entire dataset of the urology department from the year 2023, including all procedures from the AOP catalog, applying context verification. From this, three risk groups (RG) are formed: 1) all cases that remain after context verification but still contain other procedures than only AOP procedures, 2) cases that contain only AOP procedures, and 3) a RG of the hybrid-DRG. An analysis of individual epidemiological parameters and a cost simulation were carried out.
Results: RG 1, with a share of 28.1% of the total number of cases, shows the greatest risk with 701 cases amounting to € 1,742,819 when treated in an outpatient setting. With 3.8%, RG 2 results in a significantly lower risk on revenue with 91 cases amounting to € 161,479 or € 106,071 after the cost-revenue simulation. RG 3 of the hybrid-DRG represents the lowest revenue risk with 24 cases amounting to € 10,880. The cost simulation shows a negative result for RG 3 accounting to € 18,925.
Conclusion: Transferring inpatient operations of urological patients to outpatient treatment is associated with a decline in revenue in urology. RG 2 and 3 show certainly calculable declines in revenue. Hospitals must analyze the loss of revenue and develop solution strategies.