Yu-Hang Yuan, Hui Zhang, Wei-Ling Xu, Dong Dong, Pei-Hong Gao, Cai-Juan Zhang, Yan Guo, Ling-Ling Tong, Fang-Chao Gong
{"title":"术前胸腺上皮肿瘤风险预测基于CT增强图像的二维和三维放射组学特征与常规特征的比较","authors":"Yu-Hang Yuan, Hui Zhang, Wei-Ling Xu, Dong Dong, Pei-Hong Gao, Cai-Juan Zhang, Yan Guo, Ling-Ling Tong, Fang-Chao Gong","doi":"10.2478/raon-2025-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-Dimensional (3D) radiomics signatures based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images for preoperative prediction of the thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) risk and compare the predictive performance with conventional CT features.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>149 TET patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to December 2018, and divided into high-risk group (B2/B3/TCs, n = 103) and low-risk group (A/AB/B1, n = 46). All patients were randomly assigned into the training (n = 104) and testing (n = 45) set. 14 conventional CT features were collected, and 396 radiomic features were extracted from 2D and 3D CECT images, respectively. Three models including conventional, 2D radiomics and 3D radiomics model were established using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The discriminative performances of the models were demonstrated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the conventional model, area under the curves (AUCs) in the training and validation sets were 0.863 and 0.853, sensitivity was 78% and 55%, and specificity was 88% and 100%, respectively. The 2D model yielded AUCs of 0.854 and 0.834, sensitivity of 86% and 77%, and specificity of 72% and 86% in the training and validation sets. The 3D model revealed AUC of 0.902 and 0.906, sensitivity of 75% and 68%, and specificity of 94% and 100% in the training and validation sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiomics signatures based on 3D images could distinguish high-risk from low-risk TETs and provide complementary diagnostic information.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"59 1","pages":"69-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 2D and 3D radiomics features with conventional features based on contrast-enhanced CT images for preoperative prediction the risk of thymic epithelial tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Hang Yuan, Hui Zhang, Wei-Ling Xu, Dong Dong, Pei-Hong Gao, Cai-Juan Zhang, Yan Guo, Ling-Ling Tong, Fang-Chao Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2025-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-Dimensional (3D) radiomics signatures based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images for preoperative prediction of the thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) risk and compare the predictive performance with conventional CT features.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>149 TET patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to December 2018, and divided into high-risk group (B2/B3/TCs, n = 103) and low-risk group (A/AB/B1, n = 46). All patients were randomly assigned into the training (n = 104) and testing (n = 45) set. 14 conventional CT features were collected, and 396 radiomic features were extracted from 2D and 3D CECT images, respectively. Three models including conventional, 2D radiomics and 3D radiomics model were established using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The discriminative performances of the models were demonstrated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the conventional model, area under the curves (AUCs) in the training and validation sets were 0.863 and 0.853, sensitivity was 78% and 55%, and specificity was 88% and 100%, respectively. The 2D model yielded AUCs of 0.854 and 0.834, sensitivity of 86% and 77%, and specificity of 72% and 86% in the training and validation sets. The 3D model revealed AUC of 0.902 and 0.906, sensitivity of 75% and 68%, and specificity of 94% and 100% in the training and validation sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiomics signatures based on 3D images could distinguish high-risk from low-risk TETs and provide complementary diagnostic information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"69-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在开发和验证基于对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)图像的二维(2D)和三维(3D)放射组学特征,用于胸腺上皮肿瘤(tet)风险的术前预测,并将其预测性能与常规CT特征进行比较。患者与方法:回顾性研究2016年1月至2018年12月TET患者149例,分为高危组(B2/B3/ tc, n = 103)和低危组(A/AB/B1, n = 46)。所有患者随机分为训练组(n = 104)和测试组(n = 45)。收集14个常规CT特征,分别从二维和三维CECT图像中提取396个放射学特征。采用多元logistic回归分析,建立了常规、二维和三维放射组学模型。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线验证了模型的判别性能。结果:在常规模型中,训练集和验证集的曲线下面积(auc)分别为0.863和0.853,灵敏度分别为78%和55%,特异性分别为88%和100%。2D模型在训练集和验证集的auc分别为0.854和0.834,灵敏度分别为86%和77%,特异性分别为72%和86%。3D模型在训练集和验证集的AUC分别为0.902和0.906,灵敏度分别为75%和68%,特异性分别为94%和100%。结论:基于三维图像的放射组学特征可以区分高风险和低风险的tet,并提供补充的诊断信息。
Comparison of 2D and 3D radiomics features with conventional features based on contrast-enhanced CT images for preoperative prediction the risk of thymic epithelial tumors.
Background: This study aimed to develop and validate 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-Dimensional (3D) radiomics signatures based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images for preoperative prediction of the thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) risk and compare the predictive performance with conventional CT features.
Patients and methods: 149 TET patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to December 2018, and divided into high-risk group (B2/B3/TCs, n = 103) and low-risk group (A/AB/B1, n = 46). All patients were randomly assigned into the training (n = 104) and testing (n = 45) set. 14 conventional CT features were collected, and 396 radiomic features were extracted from 2D and 3D CECT images, respectively. Three models including conventional, 2D radiomics and 3D radiomics model were established using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The discriminative performances of the models were demonstrated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results: In the conventional model, area under the curves (AUCs) in the training and validation sets were 0.863 and 0.853, sensitivity was 78% and 55%, and specificity was 88% and 100%, respectively. The 2D model yielded AUCs of 0.854 and 0.834, sensitivity of 86% and 77%, and specificity of 72% and 86% in the training and validation sets. The 3D model revealed AUC of 0.902 and 0.906, sensitivity of 75% and 68%, and specificity of 94% and 100% in the training and validation sets.
Conclusions: Radiomics signatures based on 3D images could distinguish high-risk from low-risk TETs and provide complementary diagnostic information.
期刊介绍:
Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.