肺部恶性肿瘤患者支气管细菌定植及分离细菌的易感性。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.2478/raon-2025-0018
Sabrina Petrovic, Bojana Beovic, Viktorija Tomic, Marko Bitenc, Mateja Marc Malovrh, Vladimir Dimitric, Dane Luznik, Martina Miklavcic, Tamara Bozic, Tina Gabrovec, Aleksander Sadikov, Ales Rozman
{"title":"肺部恶性肿瘤患者支气管细菌定植及分离细菌的易感性。","authors":"Sabrina Petrovic, Bojana Beovic, Viktorija Tomic, Marko Bitenc, Mateja Marc Malovrh, Vladimir Dimitric, Dane Luznik, Martina Miklavcic, Tamara Bozic, Tina Gabrovec, Aleksander Sadikov, Ales Rozman","doi":"10.2478/raon-2025-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pneumonia (POP) remains a leading cause of mortality following lung surgery. Recent studies have confirmed that the respiratory tract below the vocal cords is not sterile and often harbours potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs), putting patients with lung malignancies at an increased risk for pulmonary infections.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study analysed 149 patients who underwent bronchoscopy for lung lesions suspected to be lung cancer. Protected specimen brush (PSB) samples were obtained during bronchoscopy prior to any specific treatment. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were conducted on the isolated strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial colonization was detected in 88.6% of patients, with 21.5% carrying PPMs. Notably, patients with type 2 diabetes exhibited a higher rate of PPM colonization compared to others. Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed no significant differences in efficacy between amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and first-generation cephalosporin in both colonized patients and those with PPMs. Importantly, no multidrug-resistant bacteria were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate a slightly lower PPM colonization rate compared to previous studies, possibly due to the unique geographic characteristics of the study population. The absence of significant differences in bacterial susceptibility between the two tested antibiotics highlights the need for further research to refine perioperative infection management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"59 1","pages":"147-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bronchial bacterial colonization and the susceptibility of isolated bacteria in patients with lung malignancy.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Petrovic, Bojana Beovic, Viktorija Tomic, Marko Bitenc, Mateja Marc Malovrh, Vladimir Dimitric, Dane Luznik, Martina Miklavcic, Tamara Bozic, Tina Gabrovec, Aleksander Sadikov, Ales Rozman\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2025-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pneumonia (POP) remains a leading cause of mortality following lung surgery. Recent studies have confirmed that the respiratory tract below the vocal cords is not sterile and often harbours potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs), putting patients with lung malignancies at an increased risk for pulmonary infections.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study analysed 149 patients who underwent bronchoscopy for lung lesions suspected to be lung cancer. Protected specimen brush (PSB) samples were obtained during bronchoscopy prior to any specific treatment. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were conducted on the isolated strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial colonization was detected in 88.6% of patients, with 21.5% carrying PPMs. Notably, patients with type 2 diabetes exhibited a higher rate of PPM colonization compared to others. Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed no significant differences in efficacy between amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and first-generation cephalosporin in both colonized patients and those with PPMs. Importantly, no multidrug-resistant bacteria were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate a slightly lower PPM colonization rate compared to previous studies, possibly due to the unique geographic characteristics of the study population. The absence of significant differences in bacterial susceptibility between the two tested antibiotics highlights the need for further research to refine perioperative infection management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"147-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后肺炎(POP)仍然是肺部手术后死亡的主要原因。最近的研究证实,声带以下的呼吸道并不是无菌的,并且经常潜藏着潜在的致病微生物(PPMs),使肺部恶性肿瘤患者肺部感染的风险增加。患者和方法:本研究分析了149例疑似肺癌的肺病变行支气管镜检查的患者。在任何特定治疗之前,在支气管镜检查期间获得保护标本刷(PSB)样本。对分离菌株进行细菌鉴定和药敏试验。结果:88.6%的患者检出细菌定植,21.5%的患者携带PPMs。值得注意的是,与其他患者相比,2型糖尿病患者的PPM定植率更高。抗生素敏感性试验显示,在定植患者和PPMs患者中,阿莫西林加克拉维酸和第一代头孢菌素的疗效无显著差异。重要的是,没有发现耐多药细菌。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与之前的研究相比,PPM定植率略低,可能是由于研究人群独特的地理特征。两种测试抗生素之间细菌敏感性无显著差异,这表明需要进一步研究以完善围手术期感染管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bronchial bacterial colonization and the susceptibility of isolated bacteria in patients with lung malignancy.

Background: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) remains a leading cause of mortality following lung surgery. Recent studies have confirmed that the respiratory tract below the vocal cords is not sterile and often harbours potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs), putting patients with lung malignancies at an increased risk for pulmonary infections.

Patients and methods: The study analysed 149 patients who underwent bronchoscopy for lung lesions suspected to be lung cancer. Protected specimen brush (PSB) samples were obtained during bronchoscopy prior to any specific treatment. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were conducted on the isolated strains.

Results: Bacterial colonization was detected in 88.6% of patients, with 21.5% carrying PPMs. Notably, patients with type 2 diabetes exhibited a higher rate of PPM colonization compared to others. Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed no significant differences in efficacy between amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and first-generation cephalosporin in both colonized patients and those with PPMs. Importantly, no multidrug-resistant bacteria were identified.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate a slightly lower PPM colonization rate compared to previous studies, possibly due to the unique geographic characteristics of the study population. The absence of significant differences in bacterial susceptibility between the two tested antibiotics highlights the need for further research to refine perioperative infection management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信