在不同人群中收集公共卫生数据的公平方法:来自全国水果和蔬菜激励措施评估的结果。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Carmen Byker Shanks, Betty Izumi, Jenna Eastman, Teala W Alvord, Amy L Yaroch
{"title":"在不同人群中收集公共卫生数据的公平方法:来自全国水果和蔬菜激励措施评估的结果。","authors":"Carmen Byker Shanks, Betty Izumi, Jenna Eastman, Teala W Alvord, Amy L Yaroch","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025000084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Public health approaches for addressing diet-related health in the USA include nutrition incentive (NI) and produce prescription (PPR) projects. These projects, funded through the US Department of Agriculture Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP), aim to support the intake of fruits and vegetables through healthy food incentives. Measuring the GusNIP impact is vital to assessing the ability of incentives to improve public health nutrition outcomes across populations. Shared measures used across GusNIP projects assess fruit and vegetable intake, food security and demographics, among other variables, through a participant survey. This study explored challenges and opportunities to evaluation across populations within a national public health oriented program, GusNIP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This qualitative study used a sociodemographic survey, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey data, and applied thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in interview and focus group data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data collection occurred in the USA virtually using Qualtrics and Zoom from fall 2021 to fall 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighteen GusNIP PPR and NI data collectors, twenty-four external evaluators and eleven GusNIP National Training, Technical Assistance, Evaluation, and Information Center staff participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Opportunities to improve evaluation among GusNIP's participants include tailoring surveys to specific subpopulations, translations, culturally appropriate food examples, avoiding stigmatising language, using mixed methods and intentional strategies to enhance representation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To increase applicability of data collection in public health programs, evaluation tools must reflect the experiences across populations. This study provides insights that can guide future NI, PPR and public health evaluations, helping to more effectively measure and understand outcomes of all communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving public health data collection approaches across populations: findings from a national evaluation of fruit and vegetable incentives.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Byker Shanks, Betty Izumi, Jenna Eastman, Teala W Alvord, Amy L Yaroch\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1368980025000084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Public health approaches for addressing diet-related health in the USA include nutrition incentive (NI) and produce prescription (PPR) projects. These projects, funded through the US Department of Agriculture Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP), aim to support the intake of fruits and vegetables through healthy food incentives. Measuring the GusNIP impact is vital to assessing the ability of incentives to improve public health nutrition outcomes across populations. Shared measures used across GusNIP projects assess fruit and vegetable intake, food security and demographics, among other variables, through a participant survey. This study explored challenges and opportunities to evaluation across populations within a national public health oriented program, GusNIP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This qualitative study used a sociodemographic survey, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey data, and applied thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in interview and focus group data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data collection occurred in the USA virtually using Qualtrics and Zoom from fall 2021 to fall 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighteen GusNIP PPR and NI data collectors, twenty-four external evaluators and eleven GusNIP National Training, Technical Assistance, Evaluation, and Information Center staff participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Opportunities to improve evaluation among GusNIP's participants include tailoring surveys to specific subpopulations, translations, culturally appropriate food examples, avoiding stigmatising language, using mixed methods and intentional strategies to enhance representation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To increase applicability of data collection in public health programs, evaluation tools must reflect the experiences across populations. This study provides insights that can guide future NI, PPR and public health evaluations, helping to more effectively measure and understand outcomes of all communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在美国解决饮食相关健康问题的公共卫生方法包括营养激励(NI)和生产处方(PPR)项目。这些项目由美国农业部格斯·舒马赫营养激励计划(GusNIP)资助,旨在通过健康食品激励措施支持水果和蔬菜的摄入。衡量GusNIP的影响对于评估激励措施改善人群公共卫生营养结果的能力至关重要。GusNIP项目中使用的共享措施通过参与者调查评估水果和蔬菜摄入量、粮食安全、人口统计等变量。本研究探讨了支持GusNIP评估的挑战和机遇。设计:本定性研究采用社会人口调查、半结构化访谈和焦点小组。使用描述性统计对调查数据进行总结,并使用应用主题分析来识别访谈和焦点小组数据中的模式。设定:数据收集在美国进行,使用Qualtrics和Zoom,从2021年秋季到2022年秋季。参与者:18名GusNIP PPR和NI数据收集人员,24名外部评估人员,11名GusNIP培训、技术援助、评估和信息中心(NTAE)工作人员参加。结果:改善GusNIP参与者评估的机会包括针对特定亚群的调查,翻译,文化上适当的食物例子,避免污名化的语言,使用混合方法,以及有意增强代表性的策略。结论:为了提高适用性,评估工具必须反映不同人群的经验。本研究提供了指导未来NI和PPR评估的见解,有助于更有效地衡量和理解所有社区的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving public health data collection approaches across populations: findings from a national evaluation of fruit and vegetable incentives.

Objective: Public health approaches for addressing diet-related health in the USA include nutrition incentive (NI) and produce prescription (PPR) projects. These projects, funded through the US Department of Agriculture Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP), aim to support the intake of fruits and vegetables through healthy food incentives. Measuring the GusNIP impact is vital to assessing the ability of incentives to improve public health nutrition outcomes across populations. Shared measures used across GusNIP projects assess fruit and vegetable intake, food security and demographics, among other variables, through a participant survey. This study explored challenges and opportunities to evaluation across populations within a national public health oriented program, GusNIP.

Design: This qualitative study used a sociodemographic survey, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey data, and applied thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in interview and focus group data.

Setting: Data collection occurred in the USA virtually using Qualtrics and Zoom from fall 2021 to fall 2022.

Participants: Eighteen GusNIP PPR and NI data collectors, twenty-four external evaluators and eleven GusNIP National Training, Technical Assistance, Evaluation, and Information Center staff participated.

Results: Opportunities to improve evaluation among GusNIP's participants include tailoring surveys to specific subpopulations, translations, culturally appropriate food examples, avoiding stigmatising language, using mixed methods and intentional strategies to enhance representation.

Conclusion: To increase applicability of data collection in public health programs, evaluation tools must reflect the experiences across populations. This study provides insights that can guide future NI, PPR and public health evaluations, helping to more effectively measure and understand outcomes of all communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信