认知行为治疗中人际关系问题与治疗联盟的时间关联。

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1037/pst0000566
Flavio Iovoli, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian A Rubel
{"title":"认知行为治疗中人际关系问题与治疗联盟的时间关联。","authors":"Flavio Iovoli, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian A Rubel","doi":"10.1037/pst0000566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpersonal problems have been identified as a potential risk factor for a weaker therapeutic alliance during psychotherapy, yet their temporal relationship and underlying dynamics remain unclear. To address this, the present study explores these associations during the first 20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy. The data from 2,123 patients undergoing treatment in an outpatient clinic were analyzed. Interpersonal problems were assessed every fifth session with the 12-item version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-12, while therapeutic alliance was measured after every session with the Session Rating Scale. Temporal associations were modeled using both a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and an autoregressive latent trajectory model with structured residuals, as they allow the differentiation of within- and between-patient components. The random-intercept cross-lagged panel model produced more reliable and interpretable estimates. At the within-patient level, contemporaneous associations were significant, indicating that higher-than-usual interpersonal problems within a session were associated with lower-than-usual experienced therapeutic alliance at the same time point (β = -.067 to -.074, <i>p</i> = .005). Over time, higher-than-usual interpersonal problems negatively influenced therapeutic alliance at the next assessment (β = -.052 to -.063, <i>p</i> = .032), while higher-than-usual therapeutic alliance predicted reductions in interpersonal problems five sessions later (β = -.051 to -.083, <i>p</i> = .002). These findings suggest a reciprocal dynamic between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance, where improvements in one construct are associated with beneficial changes in the other over time, highlighting the importance of addressing interpersonal difficulties to strengthen the therapeutic alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"208-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal associations between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavioral therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Flavio Iovoli, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian A Rubel\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interpersonal problems have been identified as a potential risk factor for a weaker therapeutic alliance during psychotherapy, yet their temporal relationship and underlying dynamics remain unclear. To address this, the present study explores these associations during the first 20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy. The data from 2,123 patients undergoing treatment in an outpatient clinic were analyzed. Interpersonal problems were assessed every fifth session with the 12-item version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-12, while therapeutic alliance was measured after every session with the Session Rating Scale. Temporal associations were modeled using both a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and an autoregressive latent trajectory model with structured residuals, as they allow the differentiation of within- and between-patient components. The random-intercept cross-lagged panel model produced more reliable and interpretable estimates. At the within-patient level, contemporaneous associations were significant, indicating that higher-than-usual interpersonal problems within a session were associated with lower-than-usual experienced therapeutic alliance at the same time point (β = -.067 to -.074, <i>p</i> = .005). Over time, higher-than-usual interpersonal problems negatively influenced therapeutic alliance at the next assessment (β = -.052 to -.063, <i>p</i> = .032), while higher-than-usual therapeutic alliance predicted reductions in interpersonal problems five sessions later (β = -.051 to -.083, <i>p</i> = .002). These findings suggest a reciprocal dynamic between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance, where improvements in one construct are associated with beneficial changes in the other over time, highlighting the importance of addressing interpersonal difficulties to strengthen the therapeutic alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"208-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000566\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人际关系问题已被确定为心理治疗过程中治疗联盟减弱的潜在危险因素,但其时间关系和潜在动力尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,本研究在认知行为治疗的前20次疗程中探讨了这些关联。研究人员分析了在门诊接受治疗的2123名患者的数据。人际关系问题每隔5次用12项版本的人际关系问题量表(Inventory of Interpersonal problems -12)评估一次,而治疗联盟在每次治疗后用会话评定量表(session Rating Scale)测量一次。时间关联建模使用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型和自回归潜在轨迹模型与结构化残差,因为它们允许区分患者内部和患者之间的成分。随机截距交叉滞后面板模型产生了更可靠和可解释的估计。在患者水平上,同期关联是显著的,这表明在同一时间点,一个疗程中高于正常水平的人际问题与低于正常水平的治疗联盟相关(β = -)。067 to -。074, p = .005)。随着时间的推移,高于平时的人际问题在下一次评估时对治疗联盟产生负向影响(β = -)。052到-。063, p = .032),而高于平时的治疗联盟预示着5个疗程后人际问题的减少(β = -)。051到-。083, p = .002)。这些发现表明人际关系问题和治疗联盟之间存在一种互惠的动态关系,随着时间的推移,一种结构的改善与另一种结构的有益变化相关,强调了解决人际关系困难以加强治疗联盟的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal associations between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavioral therapy.

Interpersonal problems have been identified as a potential risk factor for a weaker therapeutic alliance during psychotherapy, yet their temporal relationship and underlying dynamics remain unclear. To address this, the present study explores these associations during the first 20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy. The data from 2,123 patients undergoing treatment in an outpatient clinic were analyzed. Interpersonal problems were assessed every fifth session with the 12-item version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-12, while therapeutic alliance was measured after every session with the Session Rating Scale. Temporal associations were modeled using both a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and an autoregressive latent trajectory model with structured residuals, as they allow the differentiation of within- and between-patient components. The random-intercept cross-lagged panel model produced more reliable and interpretable estimates. At the within-patient level, contemporaneous associations were significant, indicating that higher-than-usual interpersonal problems within a session were associated with lower-than-usual experienced therapeutic alliance at the same time point (β = -.067 to -.074, p = .005). Over time, higher-than-usual interpersonal problems negatively influenced therapeutic alliance at the next assessment (β = -.052 to -.063, p = .032), while higher-than-usual therapeutic alliance predicted reductions in interpersonal problems five sessions later (β = -.051 to -.083, p = .002). These findings suggest a reciprocal dynamic between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance, where improvements in one construct are associated with beneficial changes in the other over time, highlighting the importance of addressing interpersonal difficulties to strengthen the therapeutic alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信