学术鼻科性别分布的相关因素。

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70092
Alison J Yu, Stephanie Wong, Kevin Herrera, Daniel Palmieri, Bozena Wrobel, Tamara Chambers, Nadia Chan
{"title":"学术鼻科性别分布的相关因素。","authors":"Alison J Yu, Stephanie Wong, Kevin Herrera, Daniel Palmieri, Bozena Wrobel, Tamara Chambers, Nadia Chan","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Women have been underrepresented in academic medicine and surgical fields. This study aimed to describe the gender distribution in academic rhinology and investigate otolaryngology departmental factors associated with female rhinologists representation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>American Medical Association (AMA) FREIDA database, American Rhinologic Society database, and online search.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified fellowship-trained rhinologists from institutional searches of residency programs identified from the AMA FREIDA database. Demographic and academic data of each rhinologist were extracted from online search. Departmental characteristics were obtained from the FREIDA database and institutional websites. The associations between female rhinologists representation and departmental factors were assessed using logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 224 fellowship-trained rhinologists, female comprised 26.8%. There were more female assistant professors (55.0% vs 39.6%) and fewer full professors (10.0% vs. 24.4%) than their male counterparts (<i>P</i> = .046). The mean <i>H</i> index was lower for female than male rhinologists among those over 5 years in practice (20.5 vs 33.0, <i>P</i> = .029). In the multivariate analysis, female rhinologists were more likely to be found in departments with greater proportions of female faculty (adjusted odds ratio 1.08 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.12], <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of female rhinologists decreased significantly as they advanced through academic rank. The main driver for female rhinologists representation is the increased number of female faculty in the department. There should be increased efforts to promote female mentorship and women in leadership positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated With Gender Distribution in Academic Rhinology.\",\"authors\":\"Alison J Yu, Stephanie Wong, Kevin Herrera, Daniel Palmieri, Bozena Wrobel, Tamara Chambers, Nadia Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oto2.70092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Women have been underrepresented in academic medicine and surgical fields. This study aimed to describe the gender distribution in academic rhinology and investigate otolaryngology departmental factors associated with female rhinologists representation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>American Medical Association (AMA) FREIDA database, American Rhinologic Society database, and online search.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified fellowship-trained rhinologists from institutional searches of residency programs identified from the AMA FREIDA database. Demographic and academic data of each rhinologist were extracted from online search. Departmental characteristics were obtained from the FREIDA database and institutional websites. The associations between female rhinologists representation and departmental factors were assessed using logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 224 fellowship-trained rhinologists, female comprised 26.8%. There were more female assistant professors (55.0% vs 39.6%) and fewer full professors (10.0% vs. 24.4%) than their male counterparts (<i>P</i> = .046). The mean <i>H</i> index was lower for female than male rhinologists among those over 5 years in practice (20.5 vs 33.0, <i>P</i> = .029). In the multivariate analysis, female rhinologists were more likely to be found in departments with greater proportions of female faculty (adjusted odds ratio 1.08 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.12], <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of female rhinologists decreased significantly as they advanced through academic rank. The main driver for female rhinologists representation is the increased number of female faculty in the department. There should be increased efforts to promote female mentorship and women in leadership positions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OTO Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e70092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OTO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:女性在医学和外科领域的代表性不足。本研究旨在描述学术鼻科学的性别分布,并调查耳鼻喉科与女性鼻医师代表性相关的因素。研究设计:横断面研究。设置:美国医学协会(AMA) FREIDA数据库,美国鼻科学学会数据库,在线搜索。方法:我们从AMA FREIDA数据库中确定的住院医师项目的机构搜索中确定获得奖学金培训的鼻医生。每个鼻科医生的人口学和学术资料都是从网上搜索中提取的。部门特征从FREIDA数据库和各院校网站获得。使用逻辑回归分析评估女鼻医生代表性与部门因素之间的关系。结果:224名接受奖学金培训的鼻科医师中,女性占26.8%。女性助理教授(55.0%比39.6%)多于男性正教授(10.0%比24.4%)(P = 0.046)。在执业5年以上的鼻科医生中,女性的平均H指数低于男性(20.5 vs 33.0, P = 0.029)。在多因素分析中,女性鼻科医生更可能出现在女性教师比例较大的部门(调整优势比1.08[95%置信区间1.04-1.12],P)。结论:随着学术等级的提高,女性鼻科医生的比例显著下降。女性鼻科医生人数增加的主要原因是该部门女教员人数的增加。应当加强努力,促进妇女担任指导和领导职务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Associated With Gender Distribution in Academic Rhinology.

Objective: Women have been underrepresented in academic medicine and surgical fields. This study aimed to describe the gender distribution in academic rhinology and investigate otolaryngology departmental factors associated with female rhinologists representation.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: American Medical Association (AMA) FREIDA database, American Rhinologic Society database, and online search.

Methods: We identified fellowship-trained rhinologists from institutional searches of residency programs identified from the AMA FREIDA database. Demographic and academic data of each rhinologist were extracted from online search. Departmental characteristics were obtained from the FREIDA database and institutional websites. The associations between female rhinologists representation and departmental factors were assessed using logistic regression analyses.

Results: Among 224 fellowship-trained rhinologists, female comprised 26.8%. There were more female assistant professors (55.0% vs 39.6%) and fewer full professors (10.0% vs. 24.4%) than their male counterparts (P = .046). The mean H index was lower for female than male rhinologists among those over 5 years in practice (20.5 vs 33.0, P = .029). In the multivariate analysis, female rhinologists were more likely to be found in departments with greater proportions of female faculty (adjusted odds ratio 1.08 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.12], P < .001).

Conclusion: The proportion of female rhinologists decreased significantly as they advanced through academic rank. The main driver for female rhinologists representation is the increased number of female faculty in the department. There should be increased efforts to promote female mentorship and women in leadership positions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信