IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Ola Mohamed-Fathy Kamal, Doddy Denise Ojeda-Hernández, Belén Selma-Calvo, María Soledad Benito-Martín, Sarah de la Fuente-Martín, Marina García-Martín, Teresa Larriba-González, Francisco Sancho-Bielsa, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Jorge Matias-Guiu, Ulises Gómez-Pinedo
{"title":"Technical Assessment of Motor and Behavioral Tests in Rodent Models of Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Ola Mohamed-Fathy Kamal, Doddy Denise Ojeda-Hernández, Belén Selma-Calvo, María Soledad Benito-Martín, Sarah de la Fuente-Martín, Marina García-Martín, Teresa Larriba-González, Francisco Sancho-Bielsa, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Jorge Matias-Guiu, Ulises Gómez-Pinedo","doi":"10.31083/JIN26429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive motor and cognitive impairments, affecting millions worldwide. It significantly reduces patients' quality of life and imposes a burden on health systems. Despite advances in understanding MS, there is no cure, highlighting the need for effective therapeutic strategies. Preclinical animal models are critical for gaining insights into MS pathophysiology and treatments. However, these models fail to fully replicate the complexity of human MS, making it essential to choose appropriate models and behavioral tests to evaluate their efficacy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review examines various motor and cognitive behavioral tests used in preclinical MS models, discussing their strengths and limitations. The goal is to guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate tests for their models, while providing insights into how these tests are performed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed motor and cognitive behavioral tests used in MS models, detailing test procedures and evaluating their advantages and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review offers a comprehensive overview that aids researchers in choosing the most suitable tests for their studies, improving the accuracy and reliability of preclinical MS research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the strengths and limitations of these tests is crucial for making informed decisions, leading to better experimental designs and, ultimately, more effective therapeutic interventions for MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","volume":"24 2","pages":"26429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN26429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多发性硬化症(MS)是一种神经退行性疾病,以进行性运动和认知障碍为特征,影响着全球数百万人。多发性硬化症大大降低了患者的生活质量,并给医疗系统带来沉重负担。尽管人们对多发性硬化症的认识取得了进展,但目前仍无法治愈,这凸显了对有效治疗策略的需求。临床前动物模型对于深入了解多发性硬化症的病理生理学和治疗方法至关重要。目的:本综述探讨了临床前多发性硬化症模型中使用的各种运动和认知行为测试,讨论了它们的优势和局限性。目的:这篇综述探讨了临床前多发性硬化症模型中使用的各种运动和认知行为测试,讨论了这些测试的优势和局限性,旨在指导研究人员为其模型选择最合适的测试,同时深入了解这些测试是如何进行和分析的:我们回顾了多发性硬化症模型中使用的运动和认知行为测试,详细介绍了测试程序并评估了其优缺点:结果:这篇综述提供了一个全面的概述,有助于研究人员为其研究选择最合适的测试,提高临床前多发性硬化症研究的准确性和可靠性:结论:了解这些测试的优势和局限性对于做出明智的决定至关重要,这样才能改进实验设计,并最终对多发性硬化症采取更有效的治疗干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical Assessment of Motor and Behavioral Tests in Rodent Models of Multiple Sclerosis.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive motor and cognitive impairments, affecting millions worldwide. It significantly reduces patients' quality of life and imposes a burden on health systems. Despite advances in understanding MS, there is no cure, highlighting the need for effective therapeutic strategies. Preclinical animal models are critical for gaining insights into MS pathophysiology and treatments. However, these models fail to fully replicate the complexity of human MS, making it essential to choose appropriate models and behavioral tests to evaluate their efficacy.

Purpose: This review examines various motor and cognitive behavioral tests used in preclinical MS models, discussing their strengths and limitations. The goal is to guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate tests for their models, while providing insights into how these tests are performed and analyzed.

Methods: We reviewed motor and cognitive behavioral tests used in MS models, detailing test procedures and evaluating their advantages and disadvantages.

Results: This review offers a comprehensive overview that aids researchers in choosing the most suitable tests for their studies, improving the accuracy and reliability of preclinical MS research.

Conclusions: Understanding the strengths and limitations of these tests is crucial for making informed decisions, leading to better experimental designs and, ultimately, more effective therapeutic interventions for MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
173
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JIN is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal. JIN publishes leading-edge research at the interface of theoretical and experimental neuroscience, focusing across hierarchical levels of brain organization to better understand how diverse functions are integrated. We encourage submissions from scientists of all specialties that relate to brain functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信