呼吸道蒸汽吸收模型对二乙酰、2,3 -戊二酮和乙酰酮的吸入剂量学和剂量反应分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Inhalation Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1080/08958378.2025.2471086
Jeffry D Schroeter, Julia S Kimbell, Bahman Asgharian, Owen T Price, Danielle Bothelo, Madhuri Singal, Nikaeta Sadekar
{"title":"呼吸道蒸汽吸收模型对二乙酰、2,3 -戊二酮和乙酰酮的吸入剂量学和剂量反应分析。","authors":"Jeffry D Schroeter, Julia S Kimbell, Bahman Asgharian, Owen T Price, Danielle Bothelo, Madhuri Singal, Nikaeta Sadekar","doi":"10.1080/08958378.2025.2471086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives are to develop inhalation dosimetry models of the flavoring agents diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin to predict uptake throughout the rat and human respiratory tracts and use the results with histopathology data from 2-week, nose-only inhalation exposures in Sprague-Dawley rats to assess relationships between predicted dose and <i>in vivo</i> responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of the nasal passages were used to simulate inspiratory airflow and vapor uptake and mechanistic models of the lung airways were used to simulate vapor uptake during a breathing cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diacetyl and 2, 3-pentanedione demonstrated similar uptake and wall mass flux patterns throughout the respiratory tract. Acetoin, being more soluble, was rapidly absorbed in the nasal and upper lung airways. At a 10 ppm exposure concentration and resting breathing conditions, nasal uptake of diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin was 30.9, 30.3, and 73.6% in the rat, and 8.7, 9.3, and 32.5% in the human, respectively; total respiratory tract uptake was 76.5, 76.8, and 93.0% in the rat and 79.6, 81.1, and 85.9% in the human, respectively. Wall mass flux patterns aligned with previously reported <i>in vivo</i> observations of histopathological effects in the rat respiratory tract following 8.75, 17.5, or 35 ppm diacetyl or 2, 3-pentanedione exposure and can be used to evaluate dose-response behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dose-response assessment of inhaled vapors demonstrates the utility of dosimetry models for interspecies extrapolation and chemical comparisons and how their use is an important part of risk characterization as non-animal alternatives are more widely considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":13561,"journal":{"name":"Inhalation Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"74-86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhalation dosimetry and dose-response analysis of diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin using respiratory tract vapor uptake models.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffry D Schroeter, Julia S Kimbell, Bahman Asgharian, Owen T Price, Danielle Bothelo, Madhuri Singal, Nikaeta Sadekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08958378.2025.2471086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives are to develop inhalation dosimetry models of the flavoring agents diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin to predict uptake throughout the rat and human respiratory tracts and use the results with histopathology data from 2-week, nose-only inhalation exposures in Sprague-Dawley rats to assess relationships between predicted dose and <i>in vivo</i> responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of the nasal passages were used to simulate inspiratory airflow and vapor uptake and mechanistic models of the lung airways were used to simulate vapor uptake during a breathing cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diacetyl and 2, 3-pentanedione demonstrated similar uptake and wall mass flux patterns throughout the respiratory tract. Acetoin, being more soluble, was rapidly absorbed in the nasal and upper lung airways. At a 10 ppm exposure concentration and resting breathing conditions, nasal uptake of diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin was 30.9, 30.3, and 73.6% in the rat, and 8.7, 9.3, and 32.5% in the human, respectively; total respiratory tract uptake was 76.5, 76.8, and 93.0% in the rat and 79.6, 81.1, and 85.9% in the human, respectively. Wall mass flux patterns aligned with previously reported <i>in vivo</i> observations of histopathological effects in the rat respiratory tract following 8.75, 17.5, or 35 ppm diacetyl or 2, 3-pentanedione exposure and can be used to evaluate dose-response behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dose-response assessment of inhaled vapors demonstrates the utility of dosimetry models for interspecies extrapolation and chemical comparisons and how their use is an important part of risk characterization as non-animal alternatives are more widely considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inhalation Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"74-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inhalation Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2025.2471086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inhalation Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2025.2471086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是建立调味剂双乙酰、2,3 -戊二酮和乙托因的吸入剂量学模型,以预测大鼠和人类呼吸道的吸收,并将结果与Sprague-Dawley大鼠2周的纯鼻吸入数据相结合,评估预测剂量与体内反应之间的关系。方法:采用鼻道计算流体动力学(CFD)模型模拟吸气气流和气相吸收,采用肺气道力学模型模拟呼吸循环过程中的气相吸收。结果:二乙酰和2,3 -戊二酮在整个呼吸道中表现出相似的吸收和壁质量通量模式。乙酰胆碱易溶,在鼻腔和上肺气道吸收迅速。在10 ppm暴露浓度和静息呼吸条件下,大鼠的鼻吸收量分别为30.9%、30.3%和73.6%,人类的鼻吸收量分别为8.7、9.3和32.5%;大鼠的总呼吸道吸收量分别为76.5、76.8和93.0%,人类为79.6、81.1和85.9%。壁质量通量模式与先前报道的8.75、17.5或35ppm双乙酰或2,3 -戊二酮暴露后大鼠呼吸道组织病理学效应的体内观察结果一致,可用于评估剂量反应行为。结论:吸入蒸汽的剂量反应评估表明了剂量学模型在种间外推和化学比较中的效用,以及它们的使用如何成为风险表征的重要组成部分,因为非动物替代品被更广泛地考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inhalation dosimetry and dose-response analysis of diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin using respiratory tract vapor uptake models.

Objective: The objectives are to develop inhalation dosimetry models of the flavoring agents diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin to predict uptake throughout the rat and human respiratory tracts and use the results with histopathology data from 2-week, nose-only inhalation exposures in Sprague-Dawley rats to assess relationships between predicted dose and in vivo responses.

Methods: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of the nasal passages were used to simulate inspiratory airflow and vapor uptake and mechanistic models of the lung airways were used to simulate vapor uptake during a breathing cycle.

Results: Diacetyl and 2, 3-pentanedione demonstrated similar uptake and wall mass flux patterns throughout the respiratory tract. Acetoin, being more soluble, was rapidly absorbed in the nasal and upper lung airways. At a 10 ppm exposure concentration and resting breathing conditions, nasal uptake of diacetyl, 2, 3-pentanedione, and acetoin was 30.9, 30.3, and 73.6% in the rat, and 8.7, 9.3, and 32.5% in the human, respectively; total respiratory tract uptake was 76.5, 76.8, and 93.0% in the rat and 79.6, 81.1, and 85.9% in the human, respectively. Wall mass flux patterns aligned with previously reported in vivo observations of histopathological effects in the rat respiratory tract following 8.75, 17.5, or 35 ppm diacetyl or 2, 3-pentanedione exposure and can be used to evaluate dose-response behavior.

Conclusions: Dose-response assessment of inhaled vapors demonstrates the utility of dosimetry models for interspecies extrapolation and chemical comparisons and how their use is an important part of risk characterization as non-animal alternatives are more widely considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inhalation Toxicology
Inhalation Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Inhalation Toxicology is a peer-reviewed publication providing a key forum for the latest accomplishments and advancements in concepts, approaches, and procedures presently being used to evaluate the health risk associated with airborne chemicals. The journal publishes original research, reviews, symposia, and workshop topics involving the respiratory system’s functions in health and disease, the pathogenesis and mechanism of injury, the extrapolation of animal data to humans, the effects of inhaled substances on extra-pulmonary systems, as well as reliable and innovative models for predicting human disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信