冷圈套息肉切除术和水下内镜粘膜切除术治疗浅表性非壶腹部十二指肠上皮肿瘤的病理切除深度。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Takayuki Nukui, Takaya Shimura, Shingo Inaguma, Naomi Sugimura, Shigeki Fukusada, Ruriko Nishigaki, Yuki Kojima, Takuya Kanno, Makiko Sasaki, Mamoru Tanaka, Keiji Ozeki, Eiji Kubota, Satoru Takahashi, Hiromi Kataoka
{"title":"冷圈套息肉切除术和水下内镜粘膜切除术治疗浅表性非壶腹部十二指肠上皮肿瘤的病理切除深度。","authors":"Takayuki Nukui, Takaya Shimura, Shingo Inaguma, Naomi Sugimura, Shigeki Fukusada, Ruriko Nishigaki, Yuki Kojima, Takuya Kanno, Makiko Sasaki, Mamoru Tanaka, Keiji Ozeki, Eiji Kubota, Satoru Takahashi, Hiromi Kataoka","doi":"10.1159/000544939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) are used for small superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). This study aimed to compare the resection depth of SNADETs removed by CSP versus UEMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from SNADETs resected with CSP or UEMR between April 2018 and July 2023 at Nagoya City University Hospital were collected retrospectively. An independent pathologist, blinded to clinical information, evaluated the resected specimens and categorized resection depth into four groups: mucosa only (M), incomplete muscularis mucosae with defects (iMM), complete muscularis mucosae without submucosa (cMM), and complete muscularis mucosae with submucosa (SM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 109 SNADETs, 78 were resected with CSP and 31 with UEMR. The percentages of M, iMM, cMM, and SM for CSP were 23.1%, 50.0%, 5.1%, and 21.8%, respectively, while for UEMR they were 0%, 6.5%, 6.5%, and 87.1%. The UEMR group had a higher SM resection rate and significantly greater median submucosal depth than the CSP group (783 μm [range, 0-2,220] vs. 0 μm [range, 0-1,226]; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, UEMR was an independent and significant factor for achieving SM resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UEMR achieved a significantly higher SM resection rate than CSP for all types of SNADETs. Clinically diagnosed duodenal high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma should be treated with UEMR rather than CSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathological Resection Depth in Cold Snare Polypectomy and Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Takayuki Nukui, Takaya Shimura, Shingo Inaguma, Naomi Sugimura, Shigeki Fukusada, Ruriko Nishigaki, Yuki Kojima, Takuya Kanno, Makiko Sasaki, Mamoru Tanaka, Keiji Ozeki, Eiji Kubota, Satoru Takahashi, Hiromi Kataoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000544939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) are used for small superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). This study aimed to compare the resection depth of SNADETs removed by CSP versus UEMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from SNADETs resected with CSP or UEMR between April 2018 and July 2023 at Nagoya City University Hospital were collected retrospectively. An independent pathologist, blinded to clinical information, evaluated the resected specimens and categorized resection depth into four groups: mucosa only (M), incomplete muscularis mucosae with defects (iMM), complete muscularis mucosae without submucosa (cMM), and complete muscularis mucosae with submucosa (SM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 109 SNADETs, 78 were resected with CSP and 31 with UEMR. The percentages of M, iMM, cMM, and SM for CSP were 23.1%, 50.0%, 5.1%, and 21.8%, respectively, while for UEMR they were 0%, 6.5%, 6.5%, and 87.1%. The UEMR group had a higher SM resection rate and significantly greater median submucosal depth than the CSP group (783 μm [range, 0-2,220] vs. 0 μm [range, 0-1,226]; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, UEMR was an independent and significant factor for achieving SM resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UEMR achieved a significantly higher SM resection rate than CSP for all types of SNADETs. Clinically diagnosed duodenal high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma should be treated with UEMR rather than CSP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544939\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)和水下内镜粘膜切除术(UEMR)用于小的浅表性非壶腹十二指肠上皮肿瘤(SNADETs)。本研究旨在比较CSP与UEMR切除snadet的切除深度。方法:回顾性收集2018年4月至2023年7月在名古屋城市大学医院用CSP或UEMR切除的SNADETs的数据。独立病理学家在不了解临床信息的情况下,对切除标本进行评估,并将切除深度分为四组:M(仅粘膜)、iMM(不完整粘膜肌层伴缺损)、cMM(完整粘膜肌层无粘膜下层)和SM(完整粘膜肌层伴粘膜下层)。结果:109例snadet中,CSP切除78例,UEMR切除31例。CSP中M、iMM、cMM和SM的比例分别为23.1%、50.0%、5.1%和21.8%,UEMR中M、iMM、cMM和SM的比例分别为0%、6.5%、6.5%和87.1%。与CSP组相比,UEMR组SM切除率更高,粘膜下中位深度显著增加(783 μm[范围,0-2220]对0 μm[范围,0-1226]);P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,UEMR是实现SM切除的独立且显著的因素。结论:对于所有类型的snadet, UEMR的SM切除率明显高于CSP。临床诊断为十二指肠高度发育不良和腺癌的患者应采用UEMR而不是CSP治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathological Resection Depth in Cold Snare Polypectomy and Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.

Introduction: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) are used for small superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). This study aimed to compare the resection depth of SNADETs removed by CSP versus UEMR.

Methods: Data from SNADETs resected with CSP or UEMR between April 2018 and July 2023 at Nagoya City University Hospital were collected retrospectively. An independent pathologist, blinded to clinical information, evaluated the resected specimens and categorized resection depth into four groups: mucosa only (M), incomplete muscularis mucosae with defects (iMM), complete muscularis mucosae without submucosa (cMM), and complete muscularis mucosae with submucosa (SM).

Results: Among 109 SNADETs, 78 were resected with CSP and 31 with UEMR. The percentages of M, iMM, cMM, and SM for CSP were 23.1%, 50.0%, 5.1%, and 21.8%, respectively, while for UEMR they were 0%, 6.5%, 6.5%, and 87.1%. The UEMR group had a higher SM resection rate and significantly greater median submucosal depth than the CSP group (783 μm [range, 0-2,220] vs. 0 μm [range, 0-1,226]; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, UEMR was an independent and significant factor for achieving SM resection.

Conclusion: UEMR achieved a significantly higher SM resection rate than CSP for all types of SNADETs. Clinically diagnosed duodenal high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma should be treated with UEMR rather than CSP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信