任务持续时间的欺骗对rpe钳形周期几何性别生理反应的影响。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05698-7
Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Clara J Mitchinson, Timothy A Butterfield, Michael A Samaan, Jody L Clasey, Haley C Bergstrom
{"title":"任务持续时间的欺骗对rpe钳形周期几何性别生理反应的影响。","authors":"Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Clara J Mitchinson, Timothy A Butterfield, Michael A Samaan, Jody L Clasey, Haley C Bergstrom","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05698-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the sex-specific influence of expected exercise duration on the physiological responses to RPE-clamp exercise anchored to RPE 15 with participants being deceived into believing the RPE-clamp exercise would last for 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but all trials were 30-min.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve males and 12 females completed a graded exercise test followed by randomly ordered RPE-clamp trials at RPE15 on the Borg 6-20 scale where subjects were deceived into expecting exercise to last for either 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but the actual duration for each trial was 30-min. Separate 2 (Sex [Male vs. Female]) × 3 (Deception [20-min, 30-min, 40-min]) × 11 (Time [0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30 min]) mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with appropriate follow-up ANOVAs, and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons, were used to examine changes in volume of oxygen uptake ( <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> ), heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), power output, and muscle oxygen saturation (%SmO<sub>2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females, but not males, demonstrated lower power outputs when expected duration was 40-min compared to 20-min after approximately half of the exercise bout. <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> , regardless of Sex, was also lower when expected duration was 40-min (62.47 ± 5.59% <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mo>max</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ) compared to 20-min (66.35 ± 5.79% <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mo>max</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ). There was no effect of expected duration on HR, RR, or %SmO<sub>2</sub>, but females demonstrated significantly higher HR (86.06 ± 5.93%HR<sub>max</sub>) and RR (74.81 ± 7.26%RR<sub>max</sub>) compared to males (79.52 ± 4.96%HR<sub>max</sub>; 62.31 ± 5.80%RR<sub>max</sub>).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPE-clamp exercise performance in females, but not males, may be influenced by the expectation of exercise duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1933-1947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of deception of task duration on the sex-specific physiological responses to RPE-clamp cycle ergometry.\",\"authors\":\"Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Clara J Mitchinson, Timothy A Butterfield, Michael A Samaan, Jody L Clasey, Haley C Bergstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05698-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the sex-specific influence of expected exercise duration on the physiological responses to RPE-clamp exercise anchored to RPE 15 with participants being deceived into believing the RPE-clamp exercise would last for 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but all trials were 30-min.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve males and 12 females completed a graded exercise test followed by randomly ordered RPE-clamp trials at RPE15 on the Borg 6-20 scale where subjects were deceived into expecting exercise to last for either 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but the actual duration for each trial was 30-min. Separate 2 (Sex [Male vs. Female]) × 3 (Deception [20-min, 30-min, 40-min]) × 11 (Time [0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30 min]) mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with appropriate follow-up ANOVAs, and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons, were used to examine changes in volume of oxygen uptake ( <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> ), heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), power output, and muscle oxygen saturation (%SmO<sub>2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females, but not males, demonstrated lower power outputs when expected duration was 40-min compared to 20-min after approximately half of the exercise bout. <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> , regardless of Sex, was also lower when expected duration was 40-min (62.47 ± 5.59% <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mo>max</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ) compared to 20-min (66.35 ± 5.79% <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mo>max</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ). There was no effect of expected duration on HR, RR, or %SmO<sub>2</sub>, but females demonstrated significantly higher HR (86.06 ± 5.93%HR<sub>max</sub>) and RR (74.81 ± 7.26%RR<sub>max</sub>) compared to males (79.52 ± 4.96%HR<sub>max</sub>; 62.31 ± 5.80%RR<sub>max</sub>).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPE-clamp exercise performance in females, but not males, may be influenced by the expectation of exercise duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1933-1947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05698-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05698-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是研究预期运动时间对RPE-clamp运动的生理反应的性别特异性影响,RPE-clamp运动固定在RPE 15,参与者被欺骗,认为RPE-clamp运动将持续20、30或40分钟,但所有试验都是30分钟。方法:12名男性和12名女性完成了分级运动测试,然后在Borg 6-20量表的RPE15上随机排序rpe夹夹试验,受试者被欺骗期望运动持续20、30或40分钟,但每次试验的实际持续时间为30分钟。采用单独的2(性别[男性与女性])× 3(欺骗[20分钟,30分钟,40分钟])× 11(时间[0、3、6、9、12、15、18、21、24、27、30分钟])混合模型方差分析(ANOVAs)和适当的随访ANOVAs,以及bonferroni校正的两两比较,检查摄氧量(V˙o2)、心率(HR)、呼吸速率(RR)、功率输出和肌肉氧饱和度(%SmO2)的变化。结果:女性,而不是男性,在预期持续时间为40分钟时表现出较低的能量输出,而在大约一半的运动后为20分钟。无论性别,当预期持续时间为40 min(62.47±5.59% V˙o2 max)时,V˙o2也低于20 min(66.35±5.79% V˙o2 max)。预期持续时间对HR、RR和%SmO2没有影响,但女性的HR(86.06±5.93%HRmax)和RR(74.81±7.26%RRmax)显著高于男性(79.52±4.96%HRmax);62.31±5.80%RRmax)。结论:RPE-clamp运动表现可能受到运动时间预期的影响,而非男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of deception of task duration on the sex-specific physiological responses to RPE-clamp cycle ergometry.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the sex-specific influence of expected exercise duration on the physiological responses to RPE-clamp exercise anchored to RPE 15 with participants being deceived into believing the RPE-clamp exercise would last for 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but all trials were 30-min.

Methods: Twelve males and 12 females completed a graded exercise test followed by randomly ordered RPE-clamp trials at RPE15 on the Borg 6-20 scale where subjects were deceived into expecting exercise to last for either 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but the actual duration for each trial was 30-min. Separate 2 (Sex [Male vs. Female]) × 3 (Deception [20-min, 30-min, 40-min]) × 11 (Time [0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30 min]) mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with appropriate follow-up ANOVAs, and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons, were used to examine changes in volume of oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 ), heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), power output, and muscle oxygen saturation (%SmO2).

Results: Females, but not males, demonstrated lower power outputs when expected duration was 40-min compared to 20-min after approximately half of the exercise bout. V ˙ O 2 , regardless of Sex, was also lower when expected duration was 40-min (62.47 ± 5.59% V ˙ O 2 max ) compared to 20-min (66.35 ± 5.79% V ˙ O 2 max ). There was no effect of expected duration on HR, RR, or %SmO2, but females demonstrated significantly higher HR (86.06 ± 5.93%HRmax) and RR (74.81 ± 7.26%RRmax) compared to males (79.52 ± 4.96%HRmax; 62.31 ± 5.80%RRmax).

Conclusions: RPE-clamp exercise performance in females, but not males, may be influenced by the expectation of exercise duration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信