开发并验证 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病/营养知识问卷。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Giulia Hofer, Lorena Sabbatini, Carolina Fellinghauer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder
{"title":"开发并验证 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病/营养知识问卷。","authors":"Giulia Hofer, Lorena Sabbatini, Carolina Fellinghauer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder","doi":"10.1111/dme.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Effective diabetes management requires adherence to medication regimens and nutritional guidelines, underscoring the importance of health literacy. Our study aimed to develop and validate diabetes and nutrition knowledge questionnaires and correlate diabetes-specific health literacy with glucose metrics in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study at a Swiss tertiary centre, questionnaires were developed to assess diabetes and nutrition knowledge in 289 participants with type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps or basal-bolus insulin and 222 participants with type 2 diabetes with or without insulin. Questionnaire validation involved content and construct validity established by a multidisciplinary team, and measurement properties were evaluated using the Rasch model. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the relationship between scores and glucose metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire demonstrated strong content and construct validity, with minor item misfits identified. In type 1 diabetes participants, higher nutrition knowledge scores (≥9/10) were significantly associated with reduced HbA1c levels (-5 mmol/mol or -0.47%, p < 0.05) and increased TIR (+9.2%, p < 0.05). No significant associations were observed in type 2 diabetes after adjusting for confounders, such as gender, BMI and diabetes duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and validated a questionnaire encompassing diabetes and nutrition knowledge, tailored to diabetes type and treatment strategy. Psychometric analysis demonstrated robust measurement properties for assessing health literacy across diverse diabetes populations. Better nutrition knowledge was significantly linked to improved glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes, reflected by lower HbA1c and increased TIR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e70018"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a diabetes/nutrition knowledge questionnaire in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Hofer, Lorena Sabbatini, Carolina Fellinghauer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Effective diabetes management requires adherence to medication regimens and nutritional guidelines, underscoring the importance of health literacy. Our study aimed to develop and validate diabetes and nutrition knowledge questionnaires and correlate diabetes-specific health literacy with glucose metrics in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study at a Swiss tertiary centre, questionnaires were developed to assess diabetes and nutrition knowledge in 289 participants with type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps or basal-bolus insulin and 222 participants with type 2 diabetes with or without insulin. Questionnaire validation involved content and construct validity established by a multidisciplinary team, and measurement properties were evaluated using the Rasch model. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the relationship between scores and glucose metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire demonstrated strong content and construct validity, with minor item misfits identified. In type 1 diabetes participants, higher nutrition knowledge scores (≥9/10) were significantly associated with reduced HbA1c levels (-5 mmol/mol or -0.47%, p < 0.05) and increased TIR (+9.2%, p < 0.05). No significant associations were observed in type 2 diabetes after adjusting for confounders, such as gender, BMI and diabetes duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and validated a questionnaire encompassing diabetes and nutrition knowledge, tailored to diabetes type and treatment strategy. Psychometric analysis demonstrated robust measurement properties for assessing health literacy across diverse diabetes populations. Better nutrition knowledge was significantly linked to improved glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes, reflected by lower HbA1c and increased TIR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a diabetes/nutrition knowledge questionnaire in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Aims: Effective diabetes management requires adherence to medication regimens and nutritional guidelines, underscoring the importance of health literacy. Our study aimed to develop and validate diabetes and nutrition knowledge questionnaires and correlate diabetes-specific health literacy with glucose metrics in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study at a Swiss tertiary centre, questionnaires were developed to assess diabetes and nutrition knowledge in 289 participants with type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps or basal-bolus insulin and 222 participants with type 2 diabetes with or without insulin. Questionnaire validation involved content and construct validity established by a multidisciplinary team, and measurement properties were evaluated using the Rasch model. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the relationship between scores and glucose metrics.

Results: The questionnaire demonstrated strong content and construct validity, with minor item misfits identified. In type 1 diabetes participants, higher nutrition knowledge scores (≥9/10) were significantly associated with reduced HbA1c levels (-5 mmol/mol or -0.47%, p < 0.05) and increased TIR (+9.2%, p < 0.05). No significant associations were observed in type 2 diabetes after adjusting for confounders, such as gender, BMI and diabetes duration.

Conclusions: We developed and validated a questionnaire encompassing diabetes and nutrition knowledge, tailored to diabetes type and treatment strategy. Psychometric analysis demonstrated robust measurement properties for assessing health literacy across diverse diabetes populations. Better nutrition knowledge was significantly linked to improved glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes, reflected by lower HbA1c and increased TIR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信