唇腭裂患者牙畸形的患病率是部位特异性的吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jitesh Wadhwa, Simar Sethi, Alpa Gupta, Puneet Batra, Serena Lalfakawmi
{"title":"唇腭裂患者牙畸形的患病率是部位特异性的吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jitesh Wadhwa, Simar Sethi, Alpa Gupta, Puneet Batra, Serena Lalfakawmi","doi":"10.17219/dmp/170879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of cleft lip in conjunction with cleft palate is twice that of cleft lip or palate alone. Dental abnormalities are more frequent in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) than in non-cleft individuals. The present systematic review aimed to identify studies that examined the prevalence of dental anomalies in unilateral and bilateral clefts. Relevant articles that met the specified inclusion criteria were identified with the use of MEDLINE/PubMed®, Scopus and EBSCOhost databases. The systematic review protocol was formulated using the established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses) checklist. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of supernumerary teeth (ST) in patients with left unilateral CLP (p = 0.021). The difference was statistically insignificant for ST between unilateral and bilateral CLP (p = 0.542). The present analysis demonstrated that the difference between unilateral and bilateral CLP, as well as between right and left unilateral CLP regarding tooth agenesis/missing teeth (A/MT) was statistically insignificant (p = 0.301 and p = 0.130, respectively). However, the black diamond presented in the forest plot indicates that the unilateral CLP and left unilateral CLP groups are in favor, respectively. Consequently, patients with left unilateral CLP exhibited a higher frequency of ST. The analysis suggests a potential association between the type of unilateral CLP and bilateral CLP concerning A/MT and ST in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"62 1","pages":"125-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is prevalence of dental anomalies site-specific in cleft lip and palate patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jitesh Wadhwa, Simar Sethi, Alpa Gupta, Puneet Batra, Serena Lalfakawmi\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/170879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prevalence of cleft lip in conjunction with cleft palate is twice that of cleft lip or palate alone. Dental abnormalities are more frequent in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) than in non-cleft individuals. The present systematic review aimed to identify studies that examined the prevalence of dental anomalies in unilateral and bilateral clefts. Relevant articles that met the specified inclusion criteria were identified with the use of MEDLINE/PubMed®, Scopus and EBSCOhost databases. The systematic review protocol was formulated using the established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses) checklist. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of supernumerary teeth (ST) in patients with left unilateral CLP (p = 0.021). The difference was statistically insignificant for ST between unilateral and bilateral CLP (p = 0.542). The present analysis demonstrated that the difference between unilateral and bilateral CLP, as well as between right and left unilateral CLP regarding tooth agenesis/missing teeth (A/MT) was statistically insignificant (p = 0.301 and p = 0.130, respectively). However, the black diamond presented in the forest plot indicates that the unilateral CLP and left unilateral CLP groups are in favor, respectively. Consequently, patients with left unilateral CLP exhibited a higher frequency of ST. The analysis suggests a potential association between the type of unilateral CLP and bilateral CLP concerning A/MT and ST in particular.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"125-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/170879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/170879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

唇裂合并腭裂的患病率是唇裂或腭裂的两倍。唇腭裂(CLP)患者的牙齿异常比非唇腭裂患者更常见。本系统综述旨在确定研究,检查了牙齿畸形的患病率在单侧和双侧唇裂。使用MEDLINE/PubMed®、Scopus和EBSCOhost数据库识别符合指定纳入标准的相关文章。系统评价方案采用已建立的PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)清单制定。meta分析结果显示,左单侧CLP患者多生牙(ST)患病率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.021)。单侧CLP与双侧CLP的ST差异无统计学意义(p = 0.542)。本分析显示单侧CLP与双侧CLP以及左右单侧CLP在牙齿发育/缺牙(A/MT)方面的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.301和p = 0.130)。然而,在森林图中呈现的黑钻石表明单侧CLP和左单侧CLP组分别是有利的。因此,左单侧CLP患者表现出更高的ST频率。分析表明单侧CLP的类型和双侧CLP之间存在潜在的关联,特别是与a /MT和ST有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is prevalence of dental anomalies site-specific in cleft lip and palate patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The prevalence of cleft lip in conjunction with cleft palate is twice that of cleft lip or palate alone. Dental abnormalities are more frequent in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) than in non-cleft individuals. The present systematic review aimed to identify studies that examined the prevalence of dental anomalies in unilateral and bilateral clefts. Relevant articles that met the specified inclusion criteria were identified with the use of MEDLINE/PubMed®, Scopus and EBSCOhost databases. The systematic review protocol was formulated using the established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses) checklist. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of supernumerary teeth (ST) in patients with left unilateral CLP (p = 0.021). The difference was statistically insignificant for ST between unilateral and bilateral CLP (p = 0.542). The present analysis demonstrated that the difference between unilateral and bilateral CLP, as well as between right and left unilateral CLP regarding tooth agenesis/missing teeth (A/MT) was statistically insignificant (p = 0.301 and p = 0.130, respectively). However, the black diamond presented in the forest plot indicates that the unilateral CLP and left unilateral CLP groups are in favor, respectively. Consequently, patients with left unilateral CLP exhibited a higher frequency of ST. The analysis suggests a potential association between the type of unilateral CLP and bilateral CLP concerning A/MT and ST in particular.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信