Yujia Feng, Mingzhu Su, Xiaojie Sun, Jinxin Zhang, Nengliang Aaron Yao
{"title":"财务导航的实施策略及其对减轻癌症幸存者财务毒性的影响:系统性综述。","authors":"Yujia Feng, Mingzhu Su, Xiaojie Sun, Jinxin Zhang, Nengliang Aaron Yao","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aims to identify the implementation strategies of financial navigation and systematically synthesise its effects on mitigating financial toxicity among cancer survivors, based on the theoretical framework of implementation science.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect and ProQuest Health & Medical Collection databases were searched for studies published before 22 August 2023. We sought original research on financial navigation interventions among adult cancer survivors with financial toxicity in healthcare settings. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials, 2.0 and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions-I were used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. In addition, the implementation strategies of the included studies were categorised and collated based on Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was adopted to explain barriers and facilities for implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6855 records were screened, yielding 14 full-text articles, which were included (3 randomised clinical trials and 11 non-randomised studies). 'Train and educate stakeholders' (n=13 (92.9%)) and 'use evaluative and iterative strategies' (n=12 (85.7%)) were the most common implementation strategies in financial navigation. The feasibility of financial navigation is relatively high, but generally hindered by the health condition of cancer survivors, low willingness to participate and insufficient number of navigators to cover all participants. After the intervention, three of seven studies reported statistically significant mitigations in patient-reported financial toxicity. In studies reporting statistically significant outcomes, 'adapt and tailor to the context' and 'change infrastructure' were proposed as key corresponding recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Financial navigation is a potentially beneficial intervention for lessening the financial toxicity of cancer survivors, but more high-level evidence is needed for further validation. Financial navigation combined with the theoretical framework of implementation science provides a foundation for the future realisation of the leap from knowledge to practice.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023469114.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation strategies of financial navigation and its effects on alleviating financial toxicity among cancer survivors: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Yujia Feng, Mingzhu Su, Xiaojie Sun, Jinxin Zhang, Nengliang Aaron Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aims to identify the implementation strategies of financial navigation and systematically synthesise its effects on mitigating financial toxicity among cancer survivors, based on the theoretical framework of implementation science.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect and ProQuest Health & Medical Collection databases were searched for studies published before 22 August 2023. We sought original research on financial navigation interventions among adult cancer survivors with financial toxicity in healthcare settings. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials, 2.0 and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions-I were used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. In addition, the implementation strategies of the included studies were categorised and collated based on Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was adopted to explain barriers and facilities for implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6855 records were screened, yielding 14 full-text articles, which were included (3 randomised clinical trials and 11 non-randomised studies). 'Train and educate stakeholders' (n=13 (92.9%)) and 'use evaluative and iterative strategies' (n=12 (85.7%)) were the most common implementation strategies in financial navigation. The feasibility of financial navigation is relatively high, but generally hindered by the health condition of cancer survivors, low willingness to participate and insufficient number of navigators to cover all participants. After the intervention, three of seven studies reported statistically significant mitigations in patient-reported financial toxicity. In studies reporting statistically significant outcomes, 'adapt and tailor to the context' and 'change infrastructure' were proposed as key corresponding recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Financial navigation is a potentially beneficial intervention for lessening the financial toxicity of cancer survivors, but more high-level evidence is needed for further validation. Financial navigation combined with the theoretical framework of implementation science provides a foundation for the future realisation of the leap from knowledge to practice.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023469114.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017557\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017557","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本系统综述旨在基于实施科学的理论框架,确定金融导航的实施策略,并系统地综合其对减轻癌症幸存者金融毒性的影响。方法:检索Medline、Web of Science Core Collection、ScienceDirect和ProQuest Health & Medical Collection数据库,检索2023年8月22日之前发表的研究。我们寻求在医疗机构中对有财务毒性的成年癌症幸存者进行财务导航干预的原始研究。采用修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具2.0和非随机干预研究的偏倚风险- i来评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。此外,根据实施变革的专家建议,对纳入研究的实施策略进行了分类和整理,并采用了实施研究的综合框架来解释实施的障碍和设施。结果:共筛选6855条记录,纳入14篇全文文章(3项随机临床试验和11项非随机研究)。“培训和教育利益相关者”(n=13(92.9%))和“使用评估和迭代策略”(n=12(85.7%))是财务导航中最常见的实施策略。金融导航的可行性相对较高,但普遍受到癌症幸存者健康状况、参与意愿低以及导航人员数量不足以覆盖所有参与者等因素的阻碍。干预后,七项研究中有三项报告了患者报告的财务毒性在统计学上显著缓解。在报告统计显著结果的研究中,“适应和调整环境”和“改变基础设施”被提出作为关键的相应建议。结论:财务导航是一种潜在的有益干预措施,可以减少癌症幸存者的财务毒性,但需要更多的高水平证据来进一步验证。财务导航与实施科学的理论框架相结合,为未来实现从知识到实践的飞跃提供了基础。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023469114。
Implementation strategies of financial navigation and its effects on alleviating financial toxicity among cancer survivors: a systematic review.
Purpose: This systematic review aims to identify the implementation strategies of financial navigation and systematically synthesise its effects on mitigating financial toxicity among cancer survivors, based on the theoretical framework of implementation science.
Methods: Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect and ProQuest Health & Medical Collection databases were searched for studies published before 22 August 2023. We sought original research on financial navigation interventions among adult cancer survivors with financial toxicity in healthcare settings. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials, 2.0 and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions-I were used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. In addition, the implementation strategies of the included studies were categorised and collated based on Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was adopted to explain barriers and facilities for implementation.
Results: In total, 6855 records were screened, yielding 14 full-text articles, which were included (3 randomised clinical trials and 11 non-randomised studies). 'Train and educate stakeholders' (n=13 (92.9%)) and 'use evaluative and iterative strategies' (n=12 (85.7%)) were the most common implementation strategies in financial navigation. The feasibility of financial navigation is relatively high, but generally hindered by the health condition of cancer survivors, low willingness to participate and insufficient number of navigators to cover all participants. After the intervention, three of seven studies reported statistically significant mitigations in patient-reported financial toxicity. In studies reporting statistically significant outcomes, 'adapt and tailor to the context' and 'change infrastructure' were proposed as key corresponding recommendations.
Conclusions: Financial navigation is a potentially beneficial intervention for lessening the financial toxicity of cancer survivors, but more high-level evidence is needed for further validation. Financial navigation combined with the theoretical framework of implementation science provides a foundation for the future realisation of the leap from knowledge to practice.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement.
The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.