IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bobby Lo, Bjørn Møller, Christian Igel, Signe Wildt, Ida Vind, Flemming Bendtsen, Johan Burisch, Bulat Ibragimov
{"title":"Improving the Real-time Classification of Disease Severity in Ulcerative Colitis: Artificial Intelligence as the Trigger for a Second Opinion.","authors":"Bobby Lo, Bjørn Møller, Christian Igel, Signe Wildt, Ida Vind, Flemming Bendtsen, Johan Burisch, Bulat Ibragimov","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic classification of ulcerative colitis (UC) shows high interobserver variation. Previous research demonstrated that artificial intelligence (AI) can match the accuracy of central reading in scoring still images. We now extend this assessment to longer colon segments and integrate AI into clinical workflows, evaluating its use for real-time, video-based classification of disease severity, and as a support system for physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We trained a convolutional neural network with the Mayo Endoscopic Subscores (MES) of 2,561 images and 53 videos from 645 patients. The model differentiated scoreable from unscoreable endoscopy sections through open-set recognition. Validation involved 140 video clips from 44 UC patients. Six inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experts and 16 non-experts rated these videos, with expert scores as the gold standard. We assessed the model's performance and the value as a supporting system. Lastly, the model underwent an alpha test on a real-world patient as a real-time endoscopic support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved an accuracy of 82%, with no significant differences between the experts and the AI. When used as a supporting system, it improved non-IBD experts' performance by 12% and disagreed with the primary physician in 20-39% of cases. During the alpha test, it was successfully integrated into clinical practice, accurately distinguishing between MES 0 and MES 1, consistent with endoscopists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our innovative AI model shows significant potential for enhancing the accuracy of UC severity classification and improving the proficiency of non-IBD experts. It is designed for clinical use and has proven feasible in real-world testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003382","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的内镜分类在观察者之间存在很大差异。之前的研究表明,人工智能(AI)在对静态图像进行评分时,其准确性可与中心阅读相媲美。现在,我们将这一评估扩展到更长的结肠段,并将人工智能整合到临床工作流程中,评估其在基于视频的疾病严重程度实时分类中的应用,并将其作为医生的支持系统:我们使用来自 645 名患者的 2,561 张图像和 53 段视频的梅奥内镜评分(MES)训练了一个卷积神经网络。该模型通过开放集识别区分了可评分和不可评分的内窥镜检查部分。验证涉及 44 名 UC 患者的 140 个视频片段。六位炎症性肠病(IBD)专家和 16 位非专家对这些视频进行了评分,并将专家评分作为金标准。我们对模型的性能和作为辅助系统的价值进行了评估。最后,我们对该模型进行了阿尔法测试,测试结果显示,该模型可为真实世界的患者提供实时内窥镜支持:结果:该模型的准确率达到了 82%,专家和人工智能之间没有明显差异。在作为辅助系统使用时,非内窥镜专家的表现提高了12%,在20%-39%的病例中与主治医生的意见不一致。在阿尔法测试中,它成功融入了临床实践,准确区分了MES 0和MES 1,与内镜医师的评估结果一致:我们的创新型人工智能模型在提高 UC 严重程度分类的准确性和提高非内镜专家的熟练程度方面显示出巨大的潜力。该模型专为临床使用而设计,在实际测试中证明是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Real-time Classification of Disease Severity in Ulcerative Colitis: Artificial Intelligence as the Trigger for a Second Opinion.

Objective: Endoscopic classification of ulcerative colitis (UC) shows high interobserver variation. Previous research demonstrated that artificial intelligence (AI) can match the accuracy of central reading in scoring still images. We now extend this assessment to longer colon segments and integrate AI into clinical workflows, evaluating its use for real-time, video-based classification of disease severity, and as a support system for physicians.

Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network with the Mayo Endoscopic Subscores (MES) of 2,561 images and 53 videos from 645 patients. The model differentiated scoreable from unscoreable endoscopy sections through open-set recognition. Validation involved 140 video clips from 44 UC patients. Six inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experts and 16 non-experts rated these videos, with expert scores as the gold standard. We assessed the model's performance and the value as a supporting system. Lastly, the model underwent an alpha test on a real-world patient as a real-time endoscopic support.

Results: The model achieved an accuracy of 82%, with no significant differences between the experts and the AI. When used as a supporting system, it improved non-IBD experts' performance by 12% and disagreed with the primary physician in 20-39% of cases. During the alpha test, it was successfully integrated into clinical practice, accurately distinguishing between MES 0 and MES 1, consistent with endoscopists' assessments.

Conclusions: Our innovative AI model shows significant potential for enhancing the accuracy of UC severity classification and improving the proficiency of non-IBD experts. It is designed for clinical use and has proven feasible in real-world testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信